Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Point.me

point.me

Comparison sites and financial marketplacesLending and credit

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
283 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
3rd of 8 comparison sites
Closing balance

Named in

18of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Point.me

AI assistants name this comparison site in 30% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector at 3.3%. Its overall score is 39 out of 100, ranking 283rd of 2,219 companies, and 10th of 93 in its sector. The website passes 6 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Point.me by name. AI assistants named it in 18 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 6th of 93 in its sector. The typical lending and credit company is named in 3.3% of answers.

Overall score
39Overall score
  • Visibility28
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment60
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness43
Summary of account
Named by AI in
30.0%
18 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
25.7%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
10 of 93
by overall score, where the typical lending and credit company scores 31

Get the full report on Point.me as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Point.me came up on 10 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How can travelers manually search for award flights without specialized tools?0/4
  2. 02Which rewards programs offer the most flexible options for booking flights with points?1/4
  3. 03Reward program search engines vs booking directly through airline loyalty portals2/4
  4. 04How does searching for award flights differ between airline websites and multi-program platforms?2/4
  5. 05How much does it typically cost to access advanced award flight search features?3/4
  6. 06What to do when your points transfer between programs takes too long for booking an award ticket0/4
  7. 07Are there free tools for searching award ticket availability across multiple programs?2/4
  8. 08Is it worth subscribing to an award flight search platform for better redemption options?1/4
  9. 09What are some alternatives to using a dedicated award flight booking platform?0/4
  10. 10Do award flight search tools actually help you save points on international travel?2/4
  11. 11Best ways for business travelers to book last-minute flights using loyalty points1/4
  12. 12Why can't I find any available award seats on my desired route?1/4
  13. 13How can families maximize value when booking group award travel with credit card points?0/4
  14. 14Best strategies for using airline and credit card points to book international flights0/4
  15. 15What are the best ways to find award flight deals for frequent travelers in the US?3/4
Total namedOpenAI: 5/15Claude: 5/15Perplexity: 2/15Gemini: 6/15All assistants: 18/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

Claudenamed the company

“Are there free tools for searching award ticket availability across multiple programs?”

Yes, there are several free tools for searching award ticket availability across multiple airline programs:

Popular Free Options:

Point.me allows you to search many different airline programs in real-time with one search and remains among the best for beginners with an easy-to-understand interface. Free users can search routes and see up to 15 top results for travel up to 60 days out.

PointsYeah is one of the best award search tools out there, and you can use most of its best features with a free account. The free version allows you to search up to four days at once, and it has a …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Roame
    8
  2. 02
    Seats.aero
    7
  3. 03
    PointsYeah
    6
  4. 04
    AwardLogic
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Seats.aero
    27.1%
  2. Point.me
    25.7%
  3. Roame
    24.3%
  4. PointsYeah
    18.6%
  5. AwardLogic
    4.3%
  6. PointCruncher
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    flightpoints.com
    32
  2. 02
    thepointsguy.com
    24
  3. 03
    awardfares.com
    11
  4. 04
    thriftytraveler.com
    11
  5. 05
    nerdwallet.com
    10
  6. 06
    thepointsparty.com
    8
  7. 07
    awardtool.com
    7
  8. 08
    frequentmiler.com
    7
  9. 09
    point.me (its own website)
    6
  10. 10
    connect.point.me
    6

Point.me is in the study as a comparison site.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
6/15
Claude
5/15
OpenAI
5/15
Perplexity
2/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Point.me compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
28

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
60

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with lending and credit companies

93 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
39
Ranks 10 of 93. Typical company: 31
Named in answers
30.0%
Ranks 6 of 93. Typical company: 3.3%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 3 of 93. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with comparison sites

8 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
39
Ranks 3 of 8. Typical company: 39
Named in answers
30.0%
Ranks 2 of 8. Typical company: 18.3%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 3 of 8. Typical company: 33
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 3: Agent-readable. Agents can request pages as markdown.

To reach level 4:
  • 1 of MCP Server Card, A2A Agent Card, Agent Skills, API Catalog
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Point.me publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
100 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersPassed

    HTTP Link headers on the homepage that point agents at machine readable resources.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
100 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationPassed

    Requests sent with Accept: text/markdown receive a markdown version of the page.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
68 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsPassed

    Content-Signal lines in robots.txt declaring search, AI input and AI training preferences.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 60 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.point.me · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Point.me as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 39 of 100 badge for Point.me

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/point.me"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/point.me.svg" alt="Overall score 39 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo