Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Bloomberg L.P.

bloomberg.com

Market data, ratings and exchangesFinancial technology and data

Money20/20 attendee

Also in the US AI Visibility Study

Statement period
September 23, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
61 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
3rd of 37 market data companies
Closing balance

Named in

38of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Bloomberg L.P.

AI assistants name Bloomberg L.P. in 63.3% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 44 out of 100, ranking 61st of 2,219 overall and 25th of 574 in its sector. The website passes 6 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Bloomberg L.P. by name. AI assistants named it in 38 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 1st of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
44Overall score
  • Visibility48
  • Citations4
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness43
Summary of account
Named by AI in
63.3%
38 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
25.3%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
25 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on Bloomberg L.P. as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Bloomberg L.P. came up on 14 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Business and financial news sites vs. general news platforms—what's the difference in economic reporting depth?3/4
  2. 02How can users resolve issues with accessing paywalled business news articles?1/4
  3. 03How do multimedia financial news services compare to traditional print publications for market coverage?2/4
  4. 04How can business professionals use online financial news to inform trading decisions?3/4
  5. 05How much do leading financial news and data services typically cost per month?4/4
  6. 06What factors should professionals consider before subscribing to a business news platform?1/4
  7. 07Where can students access reliable business news and analysis without a paid subscription?4/4
  8. 08Alternatives to subscription-based business news sites for staying informed about financial markets2/4
  9. 09Where can investors find in-depth markets analysis and financial data online?4/4
  10. 10What are the best free sources for real-time updates on economic and market news?3/4
  11. 11Why do some financial news websites have delayed market data feeds?0/4
  12. 12Best resources for tracking breaking economic news relevant to portfolio management4/4
  13. 13Are there any free trials available for comprehensive markets news and analysis platforms?2/4
  14. 14What are the best business news sources for real-time stock market updates?4/4
  15. 15Is paying for a premium financial news subscription worth it for individual investors?1/4
Total namedOpenAI: 12/15Claude: 8/15Perplexity: 8/15Gemini: 10/15All assistants: 38/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

Claudenamed the company

“How much do leading financial news and data services typically cost per month?”

Let me search for more specific pricing information on current services like Bloomberg, Reuters, and others.Based on the search results, here's what leading financial news and data services typically cost per month:

Enterprise-Level Services

Bloomberg Terminal: The Bloomberg Terminal costs $31,980 per year ($2,665 per month) per seat in 2026 for a single-terminal subscription, or $28,320 per seat per year for clients with multiple terminals.

Refinitiv Eikon (now LSEG Workspace): Eikon starting around $1,800/month ($21,600/year), making it a more affordable alternative to Bloomber …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    The Wall Street Journal
    30
  2. 02
    Reuters
    29
  3. 03
    CNBC
    21
  4. 04
    MarketWatch
    19
  5. 05
    Financial Times
    18

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Bloomberg L.P.
    25.3%
  2. Reuters
    20.0%
  3. The Wall Street Journal
    18.7%
  4. CNBC
    14.0%
  5. MarketWatch
    12.7%
  6. Financial Times
    9.3%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    bloomberg.com (its own website)
    30
  2. 02
    reuters.com
    25
  3. 03
    marketbeat.com
    18
  4. 04
    finance.yahoo.com
    16
  5. 05
    reddit.com
    16
  6. 06
    investing.com
    14
  7. 07
    wsj.com
    12
  8. 08
    alpha-sense.com
    12
  9. 09
    tradingview.com
    11
  10. 10
    economictimes.indiatimes.com
    11

Bloomberg L.P. is in the study as a market data company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
12/15
Gemini
10/15
Perplexity
8/15
Claude
8/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Bloomberg L.P. compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
48

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
4

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
44
Ranks 25 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
63.3%
Ranks 1 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 29 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with market data companies

37 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
44
Ranks 3 of 37. Typical company: 36
Named in answers
63.3%
Ranks 1 of 37. Typical company: 15.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 2 of 37. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Bloomberg L.P. publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPCould not check
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtCould not check
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
100 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersCould not check

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
  • Markdown negotiationCould not check

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtCould not check

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
11 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdCould not check

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 43 of 100 · 69% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.bloomberg.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 17 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*partly
  • ClaudeBot*partly
  • Anthropic-AI*partly
  • Google-Extended*partly
  • Applebot-Extended*blocked
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*blocked
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespider*blocked
  • CCBot*blocked
  • Diffbot*blocked
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*partly
  • Claude-SearchBot*partly
  • PerplexityBot*partly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbot*blocked
  • YouBot*partly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*partly
  • Claude-User*partly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBot*partly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Bloomberg L.P. as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 44 of 100 badge for Bloomberg L.P.

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/bloomberg.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/bloomberg.com.svg" alt="Overall score 44 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo