Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

TradingView

tradingview.com

Market data, ratings and exchangesFinancial technology and data

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 and 10, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
5 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
1st of 37 market data companies
Closing balance

Named in

38of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for TradingView

AI assistants name TradingView in 63.3% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector, which is named in 1.7% of answers. Its overall score is 52 out of 100, ranking 5th of 2,219 in the study and 1st among 574 sector peers. Its website passes 6 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned TradingView by name. AI assistants named it in 38 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 1st of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
52Overall score
  • Visibility56
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment82
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness43
Summary of account
Named by AI in
63.3%
38 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
48.1%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
1 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on TradingView as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

TradingView came up on 12 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How does a desktop-based market analysis platform compare to a cloud-based web charting tool?0/4
  2. 02Are there differences between platforms designed mainly for technical analysis versus fundamental analysis?2/4
  3. 03How do open-source financial charting platforms compare to commercial ones in terms of features?2/4
  4. 04How can I use financial charting software to backtest trading strategies for futures contracts?2/4
  5. 05What is a good charting platform for tracking multiple asset classes including forex and futures?4/4
  6. 06Why are certain custom indicators not displaying correctly on my market analysis charts?4/4
  7. 07Which market analytics tools are popular among beginner traders in the United States?4/4
  8. 08What are some alternatives to cloud-based financial charting platforms for active traders?2/4
  9. 09Do advanced market analytics tools improve trading outcomes for hobbyist investors?0/4
  10. 10What’s the best way to monitor real-time market movements across US equities and crypto in one dashboard?3/4
  11. 11Is it worth paying for a premium charting platform if I only invest part-time?3/4
  12. 12Are there any free financial market analysis tools in the US with real-time data?4/4
  13. 13What can I do if my stock chart data is delayed on a financial platform?0/4
  14. 14What are the best financial charting platforms for analyzing US stocks and crypto?4/4
  15. 15What is the typical monthly subscription cost for accessing advanced charting platforms?4/4
Total namedOpenAI: 8/15Claude: 10/15Perplexity: 9/15Gemini: 11/15All assistants: 38/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What is a good charting platform for tracking multiple asset classes including forex and futures?”

TradingView is the best general-purpose choice for tracking multiple asset classes, including forex, futures, stocks, crypto, indices, and bonds. It offers strong charting, alerts, layouts, drawing tools, watchlists, and a large indicator ecosystem; its free plan is useful for basic monitoring, while paid tiers add more charts, alerts, and data features.

Other good choices:

Sierra Chart — Best for serious futures traders who prioritize market depth, order-flow tools, footprint charts, and customization. It also supports forex, stocks, options, and crypto.

MetaTrade …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Finviz
    9
  2. 02
    TrendSpider
    7
  3. 03
    TC2000
    5
  4. 04
    StockCharts
    3

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. TradingView
    48.1%
  2. TrendSpider
    17.7%
  3. Finviz
    16.5%
  4. TC2000
    10.1%
  5. StockCharts
    7.6%
  6. TradingSim
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    quantvps.com
    9
  2. 02
    luxalgo.com
    8
  3. 03
    tradingview.com (its own website)
    5
  4. 04
    github.com
    5
  5. 05
    chartinglens.com
    5
  6. 06
    strike.money
    5
  7. 07
    liberatedstocktrader.com
    4
  8. 08
    worldmetrics.org
    4
  9. 09
    scichart.com
    4
  10. 10
    audacity.capital
    4

TradingView is in the study as a market data company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
11/15
Claude
10/15
Perplexity
9/15
OpenAI
8/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How TradingView compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
56

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
82

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
52
Ranks 1 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
63.3%
Ranks 1 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 29 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with market data companies

37 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
52
Ranks 1 of 37. Typical company: 36
Named in answers
63.3%
Ranks 1 of 37. Typical company: 15.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 2 of 37. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. TradingView publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
10 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 35 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.tradingview.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 10 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBot*partly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extended*partly
  • Applebot-Extended*partly
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*partly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespider*partly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibot*partly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*partly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBot*partly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbot*partly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*partly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on TradingView as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 52 of 100 badge for TradingView

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/tradingview.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/tradingview.com.svg" alt="Overall score 52 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo