Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

WriteChoice

writechoice.io

Marketing, communications and recruitment agenciesAdvisers and services

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
13 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
2nd of 64 agencies
Closing balance

Named in

11of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for WriteChoice

AI assistants name WriteChoice in 18.3% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector, which is named in 0% of answers. WriteChoice has an overall score of 49 out of 100, ranking 13th of 2,219 companies and 2nd in its sector. Its website passes 6 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned WriteChoice by name. AI assistants named it in 11 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 19th of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
49Overall score
  • Visibility35
  • Citations7
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness43
Summary of account
Named by AI in
18.3%
11 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
84.6%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
2 of 346
by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on WriteChoice as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

WriteChoice came up on 8 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How technical writers improve onboarding for new API users1/4
  2. 02Best technical writing services for API documentation in the US2/4
  3. 03Integrating technical writing teams into agile software development0/4
  4. 04Common issues with outsourced API documentation projects1/4
  5. 05How to fix unclear or incomplete developer documentation for SaaS products0/4
  6. 06How much do outsourced technical writing projects for APIs cost?1/4
  7. 07Are specialized SaaS technical writing services worth the extra cost?1/4
  8. 08What should product managers look for in API documentation services?0/4
  9. 09Documentation portals vs traditional help centers for scaling software0/4
  10. 10Top-rated SaaS technical writers for developer portals3/4
  11. 11Best ways to create high-quality API documentation without external help0/4
  12. 12Alternatives to hiring a specialized technical writing agency0/4
  13. 13Is it better to hire in-house technical writers or outsource API documentation?1/4
  14. 14Technical writing agencies vs freelance API writers for SaaS projects1/4
  15. 15Typical pricing models for SaaS documentation services in the US0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 7/15All assistants: 11/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Top-rated SaaS technical writers for developer portals”

For SaaS developer portals, the strongest current options are:

WriteChoice — Best for high-growth SaaS and API-first startups needing rapid documentation and product-adoption support.

DevDocs — Best for improving technical documentation, onboarding clarity, and overall developer-portal structure.

Ninad Pathak — Listed as a strong choice for technical and DevTools content.

Abdelrahman R. — Focuses on API references, integration guides, webhooks, code samples, developer portals, and docs-as-code workflows.

Henrik J. — Experienced with scalable docum …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Archbee
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. WriteChoice
    84.6%
  2. Archbee
    7.7%
  3. Docsie
    7.7%
  4. Hustle Badger
    0.0%
  5. Write the Docs Agency
    0.0%
  6. Docforce
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    writechoice.io (its own website)
    15
  2. 02
    hackmamba.io
    10
  3. 03
    squibler.io
    9
  4. 04
    upwork.com
    9
  5. 05
    archbee.com
    6
  6. 06
    linkedin.com
    5
  7. 07
    timelytext.com
    4
  8. 08
    docsie.io
    4
  9. 09
    mintlify.com
    4
  10. 10
    infrasity.com
    3

WriteChoice is in the study as an agency.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
7/15
Claude
2/15
OpenAI
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How WriteChoice compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
35

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
7

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
49
Ranks 2 of 346. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
18.3%
Ranks 19 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 13 of 346. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with agencies

64 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
49
Ranks 2 of 64. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
18.3%
Ranks 3 of 64. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 8 of 64. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 4: Agent-integrated. At least one of an MCP card, A2A card, skills index or API catalog is published.

To reach level 5:
  • Web Bot Auth
  • 4 of MCP Server Card, A2A Agent Card, Agent Skills, API Catalog
  • 1 of OAuth discovery, OAuth Protected Resource, auth.md
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. WriteChoice publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsPublished
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
75 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationPassed

    Requests sent with Accept: text/markdown receive a markdown version of the page.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPartly met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
68 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsPassed

    Content-Signal lines in robots.txt declaring search, AI input and AI training preferences.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
13 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsPassed

    A skills index at /.well-known/agent-skills/index.json that agents can load.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 54 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · writechoice.io · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on WriteChoice as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 49 of 100 badge for WriteChoice

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/writechoice.io"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/writechoice.io.svg" alt="Overall score 49 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo