Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
818 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

4of 60 answers

by 2 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for WireBarley

AI assistants name WireBarley in 6.7% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is not named at all. Its overall score is 31 out of 100, ranking 818th of 2,219 companies. The website passes 2 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned WireBarley by name. AI assistants named it in 4 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 90th of 375 in its sector. The typical cards and payments company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
31Overall score
  • Visibility5
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment80
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
Summary of account
Named by AI in
6.7%
4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
3.8%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
117 of 375
by overall score, where the typical cards and payments company scores 27

Get the full report on WireBarley as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

WireBarley came up on 3 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How can I send money abroad with low fees from the US?0/4
  2. 02Best way to regularly send money to friends and family in another country0/4
  3. 03How much do international money transfer services typically charge for sending $1,000 to Korea?1/4
  4. 04Are low-fee money transfer services to Korea worth using from the US?2/4
  5. 05Why did my international transfer from the US take longer than expected?0/4
  6. 06What alternatives exist for sending money abroad besides digital transfer services?0/4
  7. 07What are the fastest ways to send money to Korea from the US?1/4
  8. 08Best international money transfer services for everyday use from the United States0/4
  9. 09Bank wire transfers vs online money transfer platforms for sending funds overseas0/4
  10. 10International money transfer services vs traditional banks for everyday remittances0/4
  11. 11Is it safe to use online platforms to send money to family overseas?0/4
  12. 12ACH direct debit vs debit card for international money transfers0/4
  13. 13Do exchange rates offered by online money transfer platforms change frequently?0/4
  14. 14Common reasons for failed money transfers to Korea0/4
  15. 15How reliable are app-based international money transfer services?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 3/15Gemini: 1/15All assistants: 4/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What are the fastest ways to send money to Korea from the US?”

The fastest options are usually Wise, Remitly Express, WireBarley, or Western Union, funded with a debit card or another instant-payment method. Delivery can range from seconds to a few hours, while a traditional bank wire commonly takes 1–3 business days.

Wise: Often the best balance of speed, exchange rate, and transparency. Wise reports that 77% of transfers arrive in under 20 seconds and 95% within a day; debit-card funding for a sample transfer arrived in about 33 minutes.

Remitly Express: Designed for rapid delivery, often within minutes or hours, but …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Remitly
    37
  2. 02
    Western Union
    18
  3. 03
    WorldRemit
    8
  4. 04
    Wise (formerly TransferWise)
    4

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Remitly
    30.2%
  2. Wise (formerly TransferWise)
    26.4%
  3. Western Union
    17.0%
  4. Xoom (a PayPal service)
    15.1%
  5. WorldRemit
    7.5%
  6. WireBarley
    3.8%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    wise.com
    50
  2. 02
    xe.com
    20
  3. 03
    airwallex.com
    20
  4. 04
    remitly.com
    17
  5. 05
    finder.com
    13
  6. 06
    moneytransfers.com
    11
  7. 07
    revolut.com
    11
  8. 08
    sendmoneycompare.com
    11
  9. 09
    cnbc.com
    8
  10. 10
    westernunion.com
    7

WireBarley is in the study as a cross-border payments provider.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
3/15
Gemini
1/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How WireBarley compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
5

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
80

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with cards and payments companies

375 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
31
Ranks 117 of 375. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 90 of 375. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 216 of 375. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with cross-border payments providers

84 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
31
Ranks 22 of 84. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 19 of 84. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 51 of 84. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. WireBarley publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.wirebarley.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on WireBarley as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 11

Share this result

Overall score 31 of 100 badge for WireBarley

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/wirebarley.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/wirebarley.com.svg" alt="Overall score 31 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo