Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
89 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
1st of 32 law firms
Closing balance

Named in

3of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Troutman Pepper Locke

AI assistants name the law firm in 5% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is named in 0%. Its overall score is 44 out of 100, ranking 89th of 2,219 companies. The website passes 6 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Troutman Pepper Locke by name. AI assistants named it in 3 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 77th of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
44Overall score
  • Visibility14
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality93
  • AI readiness43
Summary of account
Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
50.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
6 of 346
by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on Troutman Pepper Locke as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Troutman Pepper Locke came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Multi-practice law firms vs boutique legal providers for complex corporate matters0/4
  2. 02Options for specialized legal support if a full-service firm is out of budget0/4
  3. 03What are the top national law firms specializing in regulatory services for financial institutions?0/4
  4. 04Alternatives to hiring a full-service law firm for small business legal needs0/4
  5. 05Do national law firms provide better value for cross-border M&A than smaller firms?0/4
  6. 06How do billing models differ for litigation vs advisory services in top US law firms?0/4
  7. 07Legal services needed for launching a new reinsurance product in the US1/4
  8. 08Is hiring a full-service law firm worth the higher fees for a large healthcare merger?0/4
  9. 09How can a national law firm help financial institutions navigate evolving regulatory frameworks?0/4
  10. 10What is the typical hourly rate for senior attorneys at large national law firms?0/4
  11. 11How to resolve delays when your law firm is managing a multi-state real estate transaction0/4
  12. 12Best full-service law firms for private equity transactions in the US0/4
  13. 13Which law firms in the US are recognized for expertise in health care and life sciences sectors?2/4
  14. 14How do national law firms differ from regional firms in energy sector legal expertise?0/4
  15. 15What to do if your legal counsel lacks experience with insurance regulatory compliance?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 1/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 1/15All assistants: 3/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Which law firms in the US are recognized for expertise in health care and life sciences sectors?”

… Troutman Pepper Locke — Offers a large multidisciplinary practice covering health systems, providers, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, biotechnology, digital health, IP, regulatory work, and litigation.

Foley & Lardner — Recognized for health-care law and life sciences work, including clinical research, clinical trials, and related corporate and regulatory matters.

Dorsey & Whitney — Strong across hospitals, pharmacies, insurers, drug and device manufacturers, biotechnology, clinical trials, and technology-enabled health care.

Akerman — Handles matters for m …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Alston & Bird
    2
  2. 02
    McGuireWoods
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Troutman Pepper Locke
    50.0%
  2. Alston & Bird
    33.3%
  3. McGuireWoods
    16.7%
  4. Holland & Knight
    0.0%
  5. BakerHostetler
    0.0%
  6. Hunton Andrews Kurth
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    chambers.com
    11
  2. 02
    lw.com
    9
  3. 03
    hinshawlaw.com
    6
  4. 04
    skadden.com
    5
  5. 05
    en.wikipedia.org
    5
  6. 06
    mcdermottlaw.com
    5
  7. 07
    umbrex.com
    4
  8. 08
    news.bloomberglaw.com
    4
  9. 09
    morganlewis.com
    4
  10. 10
    troutman.com (its own website)
    3

Troutman Pepper Locke is in the study as a law firm.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
1/15
Gemini
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Troutman Pepper Locke compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
14

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
93

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
44
Ranks 6 of 346. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 77 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 13 of 346. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with law firms

32 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
44
Ranks 1 of 32. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 8 of 32. Typical company: 0.8%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 1 of 32. Typical company: 21
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Troutman Pepper Locke publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
18 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPartly met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 31 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.troutman.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Troutman Pepper Locke as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 44 of 100 badge for Troutman Pepper Locke

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/troutman.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/troutman.com.svg" alt="Overall score 44 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo