Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
627 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

7of 60 answers

by 1 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Trendtracker

AI assistants name Trendtracker in 11.7% of answers, which is higher than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 35 out of 100, ranking 627th of 2,219 companies. Its website passes 5 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Trendtracker by name. AI assistants named it in 7 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 100th of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
35Overall score
  • Visibility20
  • Citations5
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness36
Summary of account
Named by AI in
11.7%
7 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
41.2%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
199 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on Trendtracker as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Trendtracker came up on 7 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are typical applications of automated trend radars for enterprise strategy departments?1/4
  2. 02Are there open-source or lower-cost options for automated trend monitoring and forecasting?0/4
  3. 03How can organizations stay ahead of market shifts without using dedicated trend foresight technology?1/4
  4. 04Are there pay-as-you-go options available for business trend discovery and foresight tools?1/4
  5. 05Is investing in an AI-driven trend scouting platform worthwhile for corporate innovation teams?1/4
  6. 06What is the average cost for enterprise-level AI trend intelligence solutions in the US?1/4
  7. 07What alternatives exist to AI-powered platforms for strategic intelligence and trend scouting?0/4
  8. 08Why might a trend forecasting platform miss key industry signals, and how can this be improved?0/4
  9. 09How can enterprises monitor strategic trends and market shifts using advanced intelligence tools?0/4
  10. 10AI trend foresight platforms vs. manual competitive analysis: What are the key differences?0/4
  11. 11What should I do if a strategic insight dashboard provides outdated or irrelevant foresight reports?0/4
  12. 12How does a strategic intelligence platform compare to traditional market research services for detecting emerging trends?0/4
  13. 13What are the best AI-powered platforms for tracking emerging business trends and signals?1/4
  14. 14How do risk management teams use AI-powered market insight platforms to anticipate disruptions?0/4
  15. 15How do I know if my business needs an automated trend intelligence solution for strategic planning?1/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 7/15All assistants: 7/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

Gemininamed the company

“What are the best AI-powered platforms for tracking emerging business trends and signals?”

… Trendtracker is an enterprise-grade platform that functions as an AI knowledge partner for strategy, risk, innovation, and market insights teams. Its always-on foundational AI scans hundreds of millions of trustworthy online signals in real-time, surfacing relevant trends. It builds structured trend workspaces (trends, themes, boards) continuously updated by AI and scored at every level. Trendtracker offers automated trend radars that score, rank, and plot trends by maturity and momentum, with weekly briefings on competitor moves and startup signals. Its proprietary Trend Strength In …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    CB Insights
    5
  2. 02
    Quid
    3

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Trendtracker
    41.2%
  2. CB Insights
    35.3%
  3. Quid
    17.6%
  4. Meltwater Radarly
    5.9%
  5. Signals Analytics (now part of NetBase Quid)
    0.0%
  6. Maven Road
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    itonics-innovation.com
    11
  2. 02
    trendtracker.ai (its own website)
    11
  3. 03
    qmarkets.net
    5
  4. 04
    quid.com
    5
  5. 05
    zamicus.com
    4
  6. 06
    contify.com
    4
  7. 07
    userintuition.ai
    4
  8. 08
    valonaintelligence.com
    4
  9. 09
    success.com
    4
  10. 10
    infostreamglobal.com
    3

Trendtracker is in the study as a fintech infrastructure company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
7/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Trendtracker compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
20

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
5

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
35
Ranks 199 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
11.7%
Ranks 100 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 83 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with fintech infrastructure companies

315 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
35
Ranks 86 of 315. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
11.7%
Ranks 41 of 315. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 40 of 315. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Trendtracker publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 43 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.trendtracker.ai · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 17 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*allowed
  • ClaudeBot*allowed
  • Anthropic-AI*allowed
  • Google-Extended*allowed
  • Applebot-Extended*allowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*blocked
  • FacebookBot*blocked
  • Bytespider*blocked
  • CCBot*blocked
  • Diffbot*blocked
  • Omgilibot*blocked

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBot*allowed
  • Applebot*allowed
  • Amazonbot*allowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*allowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-User*allowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Trendtracker as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 35 of 100 badge for Trendtracker

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/trendtracker.ai"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/trendtracker.ai.svg" alt="Overall score 35 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo