Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Tredence

tredence.com

Consultancies and professional servicesAdvisers and services

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
508 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
24th of 177 consultancies
Closing balance

Named in

3of 60 answers

by 2 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Tredence

AI assistants name this consultancy in 5% of answers, more often than the typical company in its sector, which is named in 0% of answers. Its overall score is 37 out of 100, ranking 508th of 2,219 companies. The website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Tredence by name. AI assistants named it in 3 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 77th of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
37Overall score
  • Visibility12
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment83
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness36
Summary of account
Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
33.3%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
59 of 346
by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on Tredence as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Tredence came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Is investing in enterprise AI consulting worth it for manufacturing companies?0/4
  2. 02How can AI consulting accelerate digital transformation in the healthcare industry?0/4
  3. 03What other options are there besides hiring a data analytics firm for digital transformation?0/4
  4. 04Common pitfalls in implementing data-driven decision-making for large businesses0/4
  5. 05Popular AI-enabled analytics solutions for optimizing retail supply chains0/4
  6. 06How does enterprise AI strategy consulting compare to traditional business intelligence approaches?0/4
  7. 07Data analytics vs data science consulting—what’s the difference for enterprise adoption?1/4
  8. 08Best data analytics service providers for large retail organizations2/4
  9. 09Emerging trends in industry-specific AI services for US enterprises0/4
  10. 10What are the top enterprise AI consulting firms for healthcare solutions in the US?0/4
  11. 11What should enterprises consider before hiring a data analytics consultant?0/4
  12. 12Average cost for enterprise AI consulting services in the US0/4
  13. 13What factors influence the pricing of large-scale data analytics consulting projects?0/4
  14. 14Why do some organizations struggle with last-mile adoption of AI in enterprise settings?0/4
  15. 15Alternatives to enterprise AI consulting for improving business insights0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 3/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Best data analytics service providers for large retail organizations”

For a large retail organization, the strongest shortlist is Tredence, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Capgemini, Accenture, Deloitte, and LatentView Analytics. The best choice depends on whether the priority is retail-specific forecasting, enterprise data-platform modernization, omnichannel/customer analytics, or managed operations.

Provider · Best fit · Strengths

Tredence · Retail forecasting and decision intelligence · Demand forecasting, pricing, promotion optimization, inventory, and translating analytics into planning workflows. It is particularly suited to f …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    LatentView Analytics
    2
  2. 02
    Fractal
    1
  3. 03
    Mu Sigma
    1
  4. 04
    Tiger Analytics
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Tredence
    33.3%
  2. Fractal
    22.2%
  3. LatentView Analytics
    22.2%
  4. Tiger Analytics
    11.1%
  5. Mu Sigma
    11.1%
  6. Slalom
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    linkedin.com
    10
  2. 02
    alicelabs.ai
    5
  3. 03
    oracle.com
    5
  4. 04
    clutch.co
    3
  5. 05
    ibm.com
    3
  6. 06
    accenture.com
    3
  7. 07
    iternal.ai
    3
  8. 08
    nmsconsulting.com
    3
  9. 09
    g-co.agency
    3
  10. 10
    grandviewresearch.com
    3

Tredence is in the study as a consultancy.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
2/15
Perplexity
1/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Tredence compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
12

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
83

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
37
Ranks 59 of 346. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 77 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 38 of 346. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with consultancies

177 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
37
Ranks 21 of 177. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 32 of 177. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 15 of 177. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Tredence publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 34 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.tredence.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 18 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*allowed
  • ClaudeBot*allowed
  • Anthropic-AI*allowed
  • Google-Extended*allowed
  • Applebot-Extended*allowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*allowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespider*allowed
  • CCBot*allowed
  • Diffbot*allowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBot*allowed
  • PerplexityBot*allowed
  • Applebot*allowed
  • Amazonbot*allowed
  • YouBot*allowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*allowed
  • Claude-User*allowed
  • Perplexity-User*allowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Tredence as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 37 of 100 badge for Tredence

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/tredence.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/tredence.com.svg" alt="Overall score 37 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo