Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
467 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

9of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for TransactBridge

AI assistants name TransactBridge in 15% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is not named at all. Its overall score is 37 out of 100, ranking 467th of 2,219 companies, and 68th of 375 in its sector. The website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned TransactBridge by name. AI assistants named it in 9 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 55th of 375 in its sector. The typical cards and payments company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
37Overall score
  • Visibility14
  • Citations4
  • Sentiment75
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
Summary of account
Named by AI in
15.0%
9 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
13.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
68 of 375
by overall score, where the typical cards and payments company scores 27

Get the full report on TransactBridge as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

TransactBridge came up on 7 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Typical fees charged by merchant of record providers for Indian transactions0/4
  2. 02Alternatives to using a merchant of record for accepting payments from Indian customers0/4
  3. 03Merchant of record vs seller of record: What’s the difference for international businesses expanding into India?0/4
  4. 04Is there a lower-cost solution for cross-border payment processing into India for small businesses?0/4
  5. 05Best options for global companies that want to manage their own payment compliance in India without a third-party merchant of record1/4
  6. 06How do I resolve failed UPI or netbanking payments when selling to customers in India?0/4
  7. 07How can US-based SaaS companies simplify compliance and billing for Indian customers?1/4
  8. 08What other payment orchestration strategies can international businesses use besides merchant of record models in India?1/4
  9. 09What’s the best way for ecommerce stores to manage tax and invoicing when selling in India?0/4
  10. 10What should global companies look for in a merchant of record provider handling Indian payment regulations?0/4
  11. 11Which payment processors offer the easiest integration for global businesses entering India?0/4
  12. 12What are the best merchant of record solutions for accepting payments from Indian customers?3/4
  13. 13Best practices to reduce chargebacks when processing payments from Indian buyers1/4
  14. 14Is it worth using a merchant of record service for handling cross-border sales in India?1/4
  15. 15How do managed checkout platforms compare to direct merchant of record services for cross-border payments in India?1/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 5/15All assistants: 9/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What are the best merchant of record solutions for accepting payments from Indian customers?”

For a US or other non-Indian company selling digital products to Indian customers, the strongest merchant-of-record (MoR) options are typically Paddle, 2Checkout/Verifone, Dodo Payments, and TransactBridge. The best choice depends mainly on whether you need native UPI, recurring billing, tax compliance, or broad global coverage.

Provider · Best for · India payment fit · Main considerations

Paddle · SaaS and digital subscriptions · Strong international card support; India-specific UPI availability should be confirmed for your account · Mature MoR handlin …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    PayU
    8
  2. 02
    Payoneer
    4

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. RazorpayX
    33.3%
  2. Stripe (India focus)
    21.7%
  3. PayU
    20.3%
  4. TransactBridge
    13.0%
  5. Payoneer
    7.2%
  6. Instamojo International
    4.3%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    razorpay.com
    33
  2. 02
    xflowpay.com
    25
  3. 03
    cashfree.com
    15
  4. 04
    dodopayments.com
    14
  5. 05
    transactbridge.com (its own website)
    13
  6. 06
    wareiq.com
    7
  7. 07
    stripe.com
    7
  8. 08
    rbi.org.in
    7
  9. 09
    systemhealth.rbi.org.in
    7
  10. 10
    x.com
    6

TransactBridge is in the study as a cross-border payments provider.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
5/15
Claude
2/15
OpenAI
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How TransactBridge compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
14

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
4

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
75

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with cards and payments companies

375 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
37
Ranks 68 of 375. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
15.0%
Ranks 55 of 375. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 216 of 375. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with cross-border payments providers

84 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
37
Ranks 14 of 84. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
15.0%
Ranks 12 of 84. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 51 of 84. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. TransactBridge publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 27 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.transactbridge.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on TransactBridge as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 37 of 100 badge for TransactBridge

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/transactbridge.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/transactbridge.com.svg" alt="Overall score 37 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo