Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Tradeweb Markets

tradeweb.com

Market data, ratings and exchangesFinancial technology and data

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
718 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
23rd of 37 market data companies
Closing balance

Named in

13of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Tradeweb Markets

AI assistants name Tradeweb Markets in 21.7% of answers, which is much more often than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 33 out of 100, ranking 718th of 2,219 companies. The company's website passes 3 of 14 technical checks that measure how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Tradeweb Markets by name. AI assistants named it in 13 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 37th of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
33Overall score
  • Visibility25
  • Citations3
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
Summary of account
Named by AI in
21.7%
13 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
35.1%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
221 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on Tradeweb Markets as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Tradeweb Markets came up on 6 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Which trading platforms are most popular with US-based corporate treasury teams?4/4
  2. 02Rates vs. credit electronic trading: what are the main benefits and risks of each?0/4
  3. 03Is it worth adopting an advanced workflow solution for institutional fixed income trading?0/4
  4. 04Are electronic trading platforms a good choice for wholesale market participants?0/4
  5. 05How do US electronic marketplaces structure pricing for low-volume vs high-volume bond trades?2/4
  6. 06What are common connectivity issues with institutional trading marketplaces and how can they be resolved?0/4
  7. 07What alternatives exist to electronic marketplaces for trading US Treasuries?1/4
  8. 08In what ways can data analytics from an electronic marketplace support better trade decision-making for equities?1/4
  9. 09What are the best electronic trading platforms for institutional bond trading?4/4
  10. 10What are some different solutions for automating trade workflows outside of electronic platforms?0/4
  11. 11What factors affect the transaction fees charged by electronic trading platforms to institutional clients?0/4
  12. 12How does an all-to-all electronic marketplace compare to a dealer-to-client trading platform for credit products?1/4
  13. 13Are there non-electronic methods for accessing liquidity in global money markets?0/4
  14. 14How can electronic trading platforms simplify compliance reporting for large asset managers?0/4
  15. 15Why might trade execution fail on an electronic trading platform for money markets?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 3/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 3/15Gemini: 5/15All assistants: 13/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What are the best electronic trading platforms for institutional bond trading?”

The strongest institutional bond-trading platforms are Tradeweb, MarketAxess, Bloomberg, Trumid, and BondCliQ. The best choice depends on asset class, geography, liquidity needs, and whether the institution wants execution only or a full order-management and post-trade workflow.

Platform · Best suited for · Key strengths

Tradeweb · Rates, government bonds, credit, derivatives, and global institutions · Broadest multi-asset coverage, strong dealer connectivity, RFQ and portfolio trading, and extensive sovereign-debt access

MarketAxess · Institutional c …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    MarketAxess
    8
  2. 02
    Liquidnet
    2

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Tradeweb Markets
    35.1%
  2. MarketAxess
    24.3%
  3. Bloomberg Trading Solutions
    18.9%
  4. Liquidnet
    10.8%
  5. ICE Bonds (Intercontinental Exchange)
    8.1%
  6. CME Group (BrokerTec for Fixed Income)
    2.7%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    bis.org
    18
  2. 02
    tradeweb.com (its own website)
    8
  3. 03
    lseg.com
    7
  4. 04
    tradersmagazine.com
    6
  5. 05
    sec.gov
    6
  6. 06
    fi-desk.com
    6
  7. 07
    greenwich.com
    5
  8. 08
    bloomberg.com
    5
  9. 09
    newyorkfed.org
    5
  10. 10
    wifitalents.com
    3

Tradeweb Markets is in the study as a market data company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
5/15
OpenAI
3/15
Perplexity
3/15
Claude
2/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Tradeweb Markets compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
25

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
3

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
33
Ranks 221 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
21.7%
Ranks 37 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 401 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with market data companies

37 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
33
Ranks 23 of 37. Typical company: 36
Named in answers
21.7%
Ranks 14 of 37. Typical company: 15.0%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 20 of 37. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Tradeweb Markets publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
10 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 29 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.tradeweb.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Tradeweb Markets as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 33 of 100 badge for Tradeweb Markets

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/tradeweb.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/tradeweb.com.svg" alt="Overall score 33 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo