AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026

Account holder

Teneo

teneo.com

Consultancies and professional services Advisers and services

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period: October 9 to 14, 2026; when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.: 564 of 2,219; its rank by overall score
Place in its category: 28th of 177 consultancies

Closing balance

Named in

6of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Teneo

AI assistants name this consultancy in 10% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is named in 0% of answers. It has an overall score of 36 out of 100, ranking 564th of 2,219 companies. Its website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Teneo by name. AI assistants named it in 6 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 43rd of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score

Visibility15
Citations3
Sentiment100
Site quality67
AI readiness7

Summary of account

Named by AI in: 10.0%; 6 of 60 answers
Share of mentions: 27.3%; of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness: 1/14; technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector: 69 of 346; by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on Teneo as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line items01

Every question, and where the company came up

Teneo came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

01Alternatives to integrated CEO advisory for managing financial restructuring?0/4
02How can an executive advisory partner add value during a business transformation?0/4
03What are the top CEO advisory services for navigating complex corporate challenges?4/4
04Leading risk advisory practices relevant to public company boards in the United States.0/4
05Typical pricing models for senior-led corporate strategy advisory services in the U.S.0/4
06Examples of how leadership teams use CEO advisory for post-merger integration support.0/4
07Best executive advisory firms for C-suite crisis management in the U.S.2/4
08When should a C-suite executive seek board effectiveness consulting?0/4
09Difference between CEO advisory and traditional management consulting services?0/4
10What factors impact the cost of executive advisory retainers for Fortune 500 companies?0/4
11How do CEO advisory consultants support organizations in managing reputation risks?0/4
12Are CEO advisory services worth the investment for large enterprises?0/4
13Other options besides executive advisory for enterprise-level crisis communications?0/4
14What should a board do if current advisory counsel isn't delivering actionable insights?0/4
15Executive search vs. executive advisory: which is better for leadership transitions?0/4

Total named1/152/151/152/156/60

named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detail02

What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

Claudenamed the company

“Best executive advisory firms for C-suite crisis management in the U.S.”

Based on current research, here are the leading executive advisory firms specializing in C-suite crisis management in the U.S.:
Top-Tier Firms
Teneo
An elite strategic advisory firm with exceptional crisis and CEO counsel capabilities, known for handling the most sensitive corporate situations at the highest levels. Teneo operates at the intersection of management consulting, financial advisory, and communications, bypassing middle management to provide direct advice to top decision-makers.
Brunswick Group
Consistently recognized as a top-tier agency, Brunswick provides C-suite-l …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Payees03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named

01
AlixPartners
3
02
FTI Consulting
3
03
Egon Zehnder
1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare

Teneo
27.3%
FTI Consulting
22.7%
AlixPartners
18.2%
The Brunswick Group
18.2%
Egon Zehnder
9.1%
Edelman Smithfield
4.5%

Referrers04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

01
worldmetrics.org
12
02
teneo.com (its own website)
6
03
heidrick.com
6
04
gitnux.org
5
05
mckinsey.com
5
06
corpgov.law.harvard.edu
5
07
linkedin.com
4
08
markcmo.com
4
09
wiki.tinrate.com
4
10
leadersadapt.com
3

Teneo is in the study as a consultancy.

By assistant05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude

2/15

Gemini

2/15

OpenAI

1/15

Perplexity

1/15

Market comparison06

How Teneo compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment

100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sector07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score

Ranks 69 of 346. Typical company: 27

Named in answers

10.0%

Ranks 43 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%

AI readiness

Ranks 323 of 346. Typical company: 29

Against its category08

Compared with consultancies

177 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score

Ranks 27 of 177. Typical company: 27

Named in answers

10.0%

Ranks 15 of 177. Typical company: 0.0%

AI readiness

Ranks 165 of 177. Typical company: 29

AI agents09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

0Not yet agent-ready
1Basic web presence
2Bot-aware
3Agent-readable
4Agent-integrated
5Agent-native

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:

Content Signals

Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Teneo publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols

x402Not present
MPPNot present
AP2Not present
ACPNot present
UCPNot present

Interfaces for AI agents

MCP Server CardNot present
A2A Agent CardNot present
Agent SkillsNot present
API CatalogNot present
llms.txtNot present
WebMCPCould not check

Show every check, for your technical team

Discoverability

77 of 100

robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
study: 86.1%
SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
study: 87.9%
Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
study: 1.5%
DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
study: 4.3%

Content accessibility

0 of 100

Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
study: 6.2%
llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
study: 31.0%

Bot access control

32 of 100

AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
study: 92.7%
Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
study: 2.3%
Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
study: 0.3%

APIs, auth and MCP

0 of 100

API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
study: 1.3%
OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
study: 6.3%
OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
study: 5.3%
auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
study: 0.2%
MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
study: 0.8%
A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
study: 0.2%
Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
study: 1.0%
WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
study: 0.0%
ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
study: 0.2%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.teneo.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readiness10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%

Take it with you

Get the full report on Teneo as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Share11

Share this result

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/teneo.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/teneo.com.svg" alt="Overall score 36 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>

End of statement

All 2,219 companies How we measured this

Teneo

What this means for Teneo

Get the full report on Teneo as a PDF

Every question, and where the company came up

What Claude actually said

Where the mentions went

Also named

Share of mentions

Websites the AI used as sources

Which AI assistants named the company

How Teneo compares with all 2,219 companies

What makes up the score

Compared with advisory and services firms

Compared with consultancies

Ready for AI agents

The checks behind the AI readiness score

Discoverability

Content Accessibility

Bot Access Control

API / Auth / MCP

Get the full report on Teneo as a PDF

Share this result

Want AI assistants to name your company?