Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
779 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
12th of 20 online brokerages
Closing balance

Named in

4of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Take Profit Trader

AI assistants name this online brokerage in 6.7% of answers, much more frequently than the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 32 out of 100, ranking 779th of 2,219 companies. The website passes 1 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Take Profit Trader by name. AI assistants named it in 4 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 53rd of 238 in its sector. The typical investing and wealth company is named in 0.8% of answers.

Overall score
32Overall score
  • Visibility10
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment67
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness7
Summary of account
Named by AI in
6.7%
4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
20.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
83 of 238
by overall score, where the typical investing and wealth company scores 28

Get the full report on Take Profit Trader as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Take Profit Trader came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Who benefits most from real-time risk management tools in funded futures trading?0/4
  2. 02Which funding programs offer same-day payouts for funded futures traders?2/4
  3. 03How do fees and commissions work with proprietary funding for US futures markets?0/4
  4. 04Why might a prop trading account get flagged during an evaluation period?0/4
  5. 05In what situations would a professional use a funded account over trading their own capital?0/4
  6. 06What are the best proprietary trading firms for futures traders in the US?2/4
  7. 07Are there options for getting funded in futures trading without passing an evaluation challenge?0/4
  8. 08What should I look for in a futures prop firm as an independent trader?0/4
  9. 09How can I avoid common mistakes that lead to disqualification in prop firm funding tests?0/4
  10. 10Futures trading accounts vs. spot trading accounts—what's better for active traders?0/4
  11. 11Is joining a funded futures trader program worth the monthly fee?0/4
  12. 12What are typical monthly costs for prop trading accounts for futures traders?0/4
  13. 13How do evaluation processes differ between futures prop firms and forex prop firms?0/4
  14. 14What are good alternatives to prop firm funding for active futures traders?0/4
  15. 15How can independent traders access professional trading tools without a proprietary account?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 2/15Gemini: 1/15All assistants: 4/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Which funding programs offer same-day payouts for funded futures traders?”

Several futures funding programs advertise same-day or daily payout access, but “same-day” usually means the firm reviews or approves the request that day—not that bank funds arrive that day.

Take Profit Trader — Markets day-one withdrawals after the required PRO-account buffer is cleared; payouts are processed daily.

Tradeify — Its Lightning program offers no evaluation and advertises payout processing within 24 hours; some accounts may process faster after approval.

My Funded Futures — The Rapid plan allows daily requests beginning 24 hours after the firs …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Topstep
    4
  2. 02
    Earn2Trade
    2
  3. 03
    Apex Trader Funding
    2
  4. 04
    OneUp Trader
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Topstep
    35.0%
  2. Apex Trader Funding
    25.0%
  3. Take Profit Trader
    20.0%
  4. Earn2Trade
    15.0%
  5. OneUp Trader
    5.0%
  6. Leeloo Trading
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    fortraders.com
    22
  2. 02
    quantvps.com
    7
  3. 03
    myfundedfutures.com
    7
  4. 04
    cryptoslate.com
    7
  5. 05
    goatfundedtrader.com
    6
  6. 06
    blueguardian.com
    6
  7. 07
    goatfundedfutures.com
    6
  8. 08
    propfirmmatch.com
    4
  9. 09
    damnpropfirms.com
    4
  10. 10
    jptradingcapital.com
    4

Take Profit Trader is in the study as an online brokerage.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
2/15
Gemini
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Claude
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Take Profit Trader compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
10

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
67

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
7

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with investing and wealth companies

238 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
32
Ranks 83 of 238. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 53 of 238. Typical company: 0.8%
AI readiness
7
Ranks 219 of 238. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with online brokerages

20 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
32
Ranks 12 of 20. Typical company: 36
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 13 of 20. Typical company: 10.0%
AI readiness
7
Ranks 19 of 20. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Take Profit Trader publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 28 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · takeprofittrader.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on Take Profit Trader as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 11

Share this result

Overall score 32 of 100 badge for Take Profit Trader

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/takeprofittrader.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/takeprofittrader.com.svg" alt="Overall score 32 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo