Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1,471 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

1of 60 answers

by 1 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Succinct Labs

AI assistants rarely name this digital asset infrastructure company, mentioning it in 1 out of 60 answers. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, ranking 1,471st of 2,219 companies. The website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Succinct Labs by name. AI assistants named it in 1 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 50th of 102 in its sector. The typical crypto and digital asset company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
26Overall score
  • Visibility4
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
Summary of account
Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
11.1%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
77 of 102
by overall score, where the typical crypto and digital asset company scores 30

Get the full report on Succinct Labs as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Succinct Labs came up on 1 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Why might a zero-knowledge proof computation fail to verify on-chain?0/4
  2. 02How can zero-knowledge proofs support secure digital asset transfer on blockchains?1/4
  3. 03What are practical uses of scalable cryptographic proofs for AI model verification?0/4
  4. 04How to debug common issues with integrating zero-knowledge proofs into existing enterprise infrastructure?0/4
  5. 05What are alternatives to zero-knowledge proofs for enabling privacy in blockchain systems?0/4
  6. 06Which cryptographic primitives can be used as substitutes for zero-knowledge proof protocols in AI security?0/4
  7. 07How do zero-knowledge proofs enhance privacy and scalability for enterprise technology teams?0/4
  8. 08What factors affect the cost structure of zero-knowledge proof infrastructure for enterprises?0/4
  9. 09What are the best cryptographic solutions for implementing zero-knowledge proofs in blockchain applications?0/4
  10. 10Is it worth integrating zero-knowledge proof-based cryptography into machine learning workflows?0/4
  11. 11Layer 1 vs Layer 2 approaches: Which is better for deploying zero-knowledge proof systems?0/4
  12. 12How are advances in applied cryptography transforming modern internet security?0/4
  13. 13What should blockchain developers consider before adopting zero-knowledge proof cryptographic solutions?0/4
  14. 14Are there open-source zero-knowledge proof libraries available for U.S. blockchain developers?0/4
  15. 15How do interactive and non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs differ in cryptographic infrastructure?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 1/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

OpenAInamed the company

“How can zero-knowledge proofs support secure digital asset transfer on blockchains?”

… Succinct, deterministic verification: Many ZK systems provide very short proofs the blockchain can verify quickly.

Limitations, trade-offs and risks

Trusted setup: Some SNARKs require an initial ceremony. If that ceremony is compromised, security can be undermined. Use transparent proof systems (STARKs, PLONK variants) or careful multi-party setup where appropriate.

Prover cost and latency: Generating proofs can be computationally expensive (especially for large circuits), which affects UX and throughput.

Verification cost on-chain: While proofs are succinct, verification consumes g …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    StarkWare
    2

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Aztec Network
    33.3%
  2. StarkWare
    22.2%
  3. Polygon Zero (Polygon zkEVM)
    22.2%
  4. Succinct Labs
    11.1%
  5. zkSync (Matter Labs)
    11.1%
  6. Scroll
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    arxiv.org
    36
  2. 02
    github.com
    15
  3. 03
    chainscorelabs.com
    12
  4. 04
    meegle.com
    9
  5. 05
    eprint.iacr.org
    8
  6. 06
    chain.link
    7
  7. 07
    medium.com
    7
  8. 08
    infosys.com
    6
  9. 09
    image-ppubs.uspto.gov
    6
  10. 10
    rapidinnovation.io
    5

Succinct Labs is in the study as a digital asset infrastructure company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
1/15
Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Succinct Labs compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
4

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with crypto and digital asset companies

102 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
26
Ranks 77 of 102. Typical company: 30
Named in answers
1.7%
Ranks 50 of 102. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 76 of 102. Typical company: 33
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with digital asset infrastructure companies

80 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
26
Ranks 59 of 80. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
1.7%
Ranks 37 of 80. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 60 of 80. Typical company: 36
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Succinct Labs publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 28 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.succinct.xyz · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Succinct Labs as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo