Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1,745 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

1of 60 answers

by 1 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for SteerBridge

AI assistants rarely name SteerBridge, mentioning it in just 1 of 60 answers. Its overall score is 25 out of 100, ranking 1,745th of 2,219 companies. The website passes 2 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned SteerBridge by name. AI assistants named it in 1 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 267th of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
25Overall score
  • Visibility3
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness14
Summary of account
Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
7.1%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
486 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on SteerBridge as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

SteerBridge came up on 1 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Common pitfalls when implementing operational modernization with external consultants0/4
  2. 02What factors affect the cost of hiring technology and operations consulting firms?0/4
  3. 03Best veteran-led consulting providers for mission-critical operational needs1/4
  4. 04How do I know if my agency needs mission-critical consulting services for operational improvement?0/4
  5. 05Typical pricing models for operational and technology consulting in the US public sector0/4
  6. 06How can organizations ensure smooth execution when working with technology and operations consultants?0/4
  7. 07How does a technology-focused consulting firm differ from a traditional management consulting agency?0/4
  8. 08In-house modernization teams vs. external mission-critical consulting: pros and cons0/4
  9. 09Examples of successful mission-critical technology consulting projects in federal environments0/4
  10. 10Where can organizations find expertise in navigating complex, high-stakes operational challenges?0/4
  11. 11How can consulting services help streamline complex claims processing for government programs?0/4
  12. 12Is it worth investing in technology and operations consulting for government modernization projects?0/4
  13. 13Alternatives to hiring external consultants for mission-critical operational improvements0/4
  14. 14What are the leading technology and operations consulting firms for federal agencies in the US?0/4
  15. 15Mission-critical operations consulting vs. general business consulting: what's the difference?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 1/15All assistants: 1/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

Gemininamed the company

“Best veteran-led consulting providers for mission-critical operational needs”

… SteerBridge partners with federal sectors to provide mission-critical solutions, using veteran insights and advanced technology for operational success.

Consultants for America's Veterans (CAV) is a leading firm supporting the American Veteran Community and American Military Community, as well as entities that serve them. They specialize in assisting veterans and their families with VA and Uniformed Services benefits.

For Business and Operations (across various industries):

Nineteen88 Strategies, LLC specializes in executive coaching and strategic solutions, rece …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Booz Allen Hamilton
    3
  2. 02
    Leidos
    2
  3. 03
    ManTech
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Booz Allen Hamilton
    28.6%
  2. SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation)
    28.6%
  3. CACI International Inc.
    14.3%
  4. Leidos
    14.3%
  5. SteerBridge
    7.1%
  6. ManTech
    7.1%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    consultingquest.com
    9
  2. 02
    linkedin.com
    7
  3. 03
    casebasix.com
    5
  4. 04
    cgi.com
    4
  5. 05
    consultingdemand.com
    4
  6. 06
    aristekconsulting.com
    3
  7. 07
    builtin.com
    3
  8. 08
    superbcompanies.com
    3
  9. 09
    stratengineai.com
    3
  10. 10
    govhub.online
    3

SteerBridge is in the study as a fintech infrastructure company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How SteerBridge compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
3

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
25
Ranks 486 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
1.7%
Ranks 267 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
14
Ranks 504 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with fintech infrastructure companies

315 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
25
Ranks 256 of 315. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
1.7%
Ranks 123 of 315. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
14
Ranks 277 of 315. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

This website turned most of our scan away, so it has no level. Only 46% of the checks could run. That reflects the website’s rules for automated visitors, and an AI agent arriving by itself meets the same rules.

Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. SteerBridge publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
0 of 100
  • robots.txtCould not check

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapCould not check

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationCould not check

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
  • AI bot rulesCould not check

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsCould not check

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 0 of 100 · 46% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.steerbridge.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on SteerBridge as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo