Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Redion

redion.com

Auto and home insuranceInsurance

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 and 10, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1,673 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
17th of 22 auto and home insurers
Closing balance

Named in

0of 60, its tower is dark

by 0 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Redion

AI assistants do not name this auto and home insurer in any of the 60 answers reviewed, while the typical company in its sector is named in 1.7% of answers. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, ranking 1,673rd of 2,219 companies. The website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Redion by name. AI assistants named it in none of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 57th of 97 in its sector. The typical insurer is named in 1.7% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness36
Summary of account
Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
66 of 97
by overall score, where the typical insurer scores 28

Get the full report on Redion as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Redion came up on 0 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Best ways to support employee wellbeing for a company with staff traveling internationally0/4
  2. 02Does business travel insurance provide enough value for companies sending employees overseas?0/4
  3. 03Employee benefits solutions vs individual travel insurance: which offers more comprehensive support?0/4
  4. 04How can global assistance services help manage health emergencies during international business trips?0/4
  5. 05Is it worth investing in a global assistance package for small businesses with remote teams?0/4
  6. 06Average price range for global employee benefits packages for US-based companies0/4
  7. 07Top travel insurance options for frequent international travelers0/4
  8. 08Common reasons for travel insurance claim rejections and how to resolve them0/4
  9. 09What are the best global assistance services for businesses with employees working abroad?0/4
  10. 10How does travel medical insurance compare to standard emergency assistance plans?0/4
  11. 11How much does comprehensive travel insurance usually cost for a 2-week trip abroad?0/4
  12. 12Other options besides standard employee benefits programs for multinational organizations0/4
  13. 13What should I do if my assistance provider denies a medical evacuation claim while abroad?0/4
  14. 14Assistance services to consider for US students studying overseas0/4
  15. 15What are some alternatives to traditional travel insurance for digital nomads?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 0/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

Claudedid not name the company

“Top travel insurance options for frequent international travelers”

Based on current 2026 options, here are the top travel insurance choices for frequent international travelers:

Annual Multi-Trip Plans (Best for Frequent Travelers)

Frequent travelers may prefer an Annual Travel Insurance plan for year-round protection. The top options include:

IMG Patriot Multi-Trip: Best for expats, business travelers, and frequent international travelers with broad worldwide network and availability for both US and non-US residents, covering 190+ countries.

WorldTrips Atlas Multi-Trip: Ideal for frequent international business travelers offering up to $1 mill …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Named instead

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Cigna Global
    3
  2. 02
    International SOS
    2
  3. 03
    AIG Travel Guard
    1
  4. 04
    Allianz Partners
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Allianz Partners
    40.0%
  2. Cigna Global
    30.0%
  3. International SOS
    20.0%
  4. AIG Travel Guard
    5.0%
  5. AXA Assistance USA
    5.0%
  6. Redion
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    squaremouth.com
    15
  2. 02
    internationalinsurance.com
    9
  3. 03
    americanvisitorinsurance.com
    8
  4. 04
    nerdwallet.com
    6
  5. 05
    peoplemanagingpeople.com
    5
  6. 06
    deel.com
    5
  7. 07
    grey.co
    5
  8. 08
    thehartford.com
    4
  9. 09
    business.booking.com
    4
  10. 10
    simplywall.st
    4

Redion is in the study as an auto and home insurer.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Redion compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with insurers

97 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
26
Ranks 66 of 97. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 57 of 97. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 7 of 97. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with auto and home insurers

22 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
26
Ranks 16 of 22. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 12 of 22. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 4 of 22. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Redion publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
18 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPartly met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 49 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.redion.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 15 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*allowed
  • ClaudeBot*allowed
  • Anthropic-AI*allowed
  • Google-Extended*allowed
  • Applebot-Extended*allowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*allowed
  • FacebookBot*allowed
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBot*allowed
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBot*allowed
  • PerplexityBot*allowed
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*allowed
  • Claude-User*allowed
  • Perplexity-User*allowed
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-User*allowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Redion as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo