Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
67 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
3rd of 64 agencies
Closing balance

Named in

20of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Qwoted

AI assistants name the agency Qwoted in 33.3% of answers, far more often than the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 44 out of 100, ranking 67th of 2,219. Qwoted's website passes 7 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Qwoted by name. AI assistants named it in 20 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 4th of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
44Overall score
  • Visibility31
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment77
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness50
Summary of account
Named by AI in
33.3%
20 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
29.4%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
7/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
6 of 346
by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on Qwoted as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Qwoted came up on 10 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are some other ways PR professionals can connect with journalists besides using expert-matching platforms?0/4
  2. 02Alternatives to expert sourcing platforms for finding industry thought leaders?0/4
  3. 03What’s the difference between open-source media requests and curated expert platforms?1/4
  4. 04What are the best media expert sourcing platforms for journalists in the US?4/4
  5. 05What can journalists use instead of online expert finding platforms for rapid source discovery?0/4
  6. 06How much do media expert sourcing platforms usually cost in the US?3/4
  7. 07Why am I not getting responses to my journalist inquiries on expert platforms?0/4
  8. 08Are there any free expert sourcing tools for journalists?3/4
  9. 09Is a paid account on a media expert sourcing platform worth it for freelance journalists?2/4
  10. 10How can PR professionals connect with journalists looking for credible sources?1/4
  11. 11Media expert sourcing platforms vs traditional PR outreach: which is more effective for finding expert quotes?1/4
  12. 12Do expert sourcing platforms actually help get more media coverage for PR professionals?2/4
  13. 13What’s the most efficient way for journalists to gather quotes from credible sources for news stories?1/4
  14. 14Best ways to improve expert match quality on media expert networks?0/4
  15. 15How can industry experts use media sourcing platforms to build their brand?2/4
Total namedOpenAI: 3/15Claude: 4/15Perplexity: 6/15Gemini: 7/15All assistants: 20/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“How can industry experts use media sourcing platforms to build their brand?”

Industry experts can use media sourcing platforms—such as Qwoted, ProfNet, Connectively, and similar journalist-request services—to turn specialized knowledge into consistent third-party visibility.

Create a searchable expert profile. Use a clear biography, professional headshot, specific expertise tags, recent credentials, and contact details so journalists can quickly assess fit.

Choose a focused positioning. Define three to five topics you can comment on confidently, such as market trends, regulation, technology, or consumer behavior. Specific expertise is more memorable …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    SourceBottle
    9
  2. 02
    ExpertFile
    4
  3. 03
    JournoRequests
    1
  4. 04
    Help a Reporter Out (HARO)
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Qwoted
    29.4%
  2. ProfNet (by PR Newswire)
    25.0%
  3. SourceBottle
    19.1%
  4. Help a Reporter Out (HARO)
    17.6%
  5. ExpertFile
    7.4%
  6. JournoRequests
    1.5%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    cision.com
    13
  2. 02
    buzzstream.com
    9
  3. 03
    linkedin.com
    7
  4. 04
    iqnetwork.co
    5
  5. 05
    vefogix.com
    4
  6. 06
    cleverx.com
    4
  7. 07
    medialyst.ai
    4
  8. 08
    expertfile.com
    4
  9. 09
    qwoted.com (its own website)
    4
  10. 10
    meltwater.com
    4

Qwoted is in the study as an agency.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
7/15
Perplexity
6/15
Claude
4/15
OpenAI
3/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Qwoted compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
31

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
77

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
50

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
44
Ranks 6 of 346. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
33.3%
Ranks 4 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
50
Ranks 3 of 346. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with agencies

64 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
44
Ranks 3 of 64. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
33.3%
Ranks 2 of 64. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
50
Ranks 2 of 64. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Qwoted publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
18 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPartly met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 42 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.qwoted.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

7 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Qwoted as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 44 of 100 badge for Qwoted

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/qwoted.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/qwoted.com.svg" alt="Overall score 44 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo