Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

14of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for PTO Exchange

AI assistants name this retirement or benefits provider in 23.3% of answers, which is far above the 0.8% for the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 57 out of 100, ranking 1st of 2,219 companies and 1st of 238 in its sector. The website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned PTO Exchange by name. AI assistants named it in 14 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 9th of 238 in its sector. The typical investing and wealth company is named in 0.8% of answers.

Overall score
57Overall score
  • Visibility41
  • Citations30
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality93
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
23.3%
14 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
87.5%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
1 of 238
by overall score, where the typical investing and wealth company scores 28

Get the full report on PTO Exchange as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

PTO Exchange came up on 7 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How can employees use converted PTO hours for student loan payments or retirement savings?1/4
  2. 02Benefits exchange platforms vs traditional paid time off cashout policies—how do they compare?2/4
  3. 03How much does it typically cost employers to offer a paid time off exchange benefit?0/4
  4. 04How do general financial wellness programs compare to PTO-based benefits solutions?0/4
  5. 05What are some other methods beyond paid time off benefits platforms to improve employee retention?0/4
  6. 06Which financial wellness strategies can employers use instead of PTO conversion programs?0/4
  7. 07What are common challenges when integrating paid time off benefits platforms with HR systems?0/4
  8. 08What are the best employee benefits exchange platforms for converting unused paid time off?4/4
  9. 09Do any paid time off benefits exchange programs offer zero-cost options for employers in the US?2/4
  10. 10Why might employees have trouble accessing their exchanged PTO benefits?1/4
  11. 11What are typical ways organizations implement flexible PTO conversion for diverse workforces?0/4
  12. 12Flexible time off policies vs paid time off exchange programs—how do they support employee financial wellness?0/4
  13. 13How can U.S. companies maximize financial wellness using PTO conversion solutions?0/4
  14. 14Do PTO benefits exchange platforms actually improve employee retention?3/4
  15. 15Is offering a paid time off exchange program worth it for mid-sized employers in the U.S.?1/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 4/15Perplexity: 3/15Gemini: 6/15All assistants: 14/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Do any paid time off benefits exchange programs offer zero-cost options for employers in the US?”

Yes. PTO Exchange advertises a U.S. paid-time-off benefits exchange with no net cost to employers. Employees can direct the value of unused, earned PTO toward options such as cash, retirement contributions, emergency savings, HSA funding, student-loan payments, charitable giving, or leave sharing.

The provider says the arrangement is funded by an IRS-required service charge paid by employees when they make a transaction, rather than by the employer. It also says there may be a nominal one-time implementation fee, so “zero-cost” generally means no ongoing employer cost, n …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. PTO Exchange
    87.5%
  2. Sorbet
    12.5%
  3. Vimly Benefit Solutions (PTO Genius)
    0.0%
  4. Level Financial Technology (Level PTO)
    0.0%
  5. WageWorks (PTO Cashout Program)
    0.0%
  6. DailyPay (PTO Unlock)
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    ptoexchange.com (its own website)
    72
  2. 02
    linkedin.com
    13
  3. 03
    worldatwork.org
    8
  4. 04
    shrm.org
    5
  5. 05
    ptogenius.com
    5
  6. 06
    marketplace.paycor.com
    4
  7. 07
    getapp.com
    3
  8. 08
    legalclarity.org
    3
  9. 09
    mercer.com
    3
  10. 10
    paychex.com
    3

PTO Exchange is in the study as a retirement or benefits provider.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
6/15
Claude
4/15
Perplexity
3/15
OpenAI
1/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How PTO Exchange compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
41

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
30

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
93

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with investing and wealth companies

238 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
57
Ranks 1 of 238. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
23.3%
Ranks 9 of 238. Typical company: 0.8%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 51 of 238. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with retirement and benefits providers

10 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
57
Ranks 1 of 10. Typical company: 31
Named in answers
23.3%
Ranks 1 of 10. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 3 of 10. Typical company: 21
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. PTO Exchange publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
72 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 35 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.ptoexchange.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on PTO Exchange as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 57 of 100 badge for PTO Exchange

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/ptoexchange.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/ptoexchange.com.svg" alt="Overall score 57 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo