Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Pitchr.ai

pitchr-ai.com

Marketing, communications and recruitment agenciesAdvisers and services

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
786 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
18th of 64 agencies
Closing balance

Named in

3of 60 answers

by 2 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Pitchr.ai

AI assistants name this agency in 5% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 32 out of 100, ranking 786th of 2,219 companies. The website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Pitchr.ai by name. AI assistants named it in 3 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 77th of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
32Overall score
  • Visibility16
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
75.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
108 of 346
by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on Pitchr.ai as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Pitchr.ai came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are effective use cases for AI-enhanced communications in the capital markets industry?0/4
  2. 02Why might an AI-powered PR campaign for a financial services firm not generate the expected media coverage?0/4
  3. 03How are AI-driven PR services for financial firms typically priced in the US?0/4
  4. 04What pricing tiers exist for strategic communications agencies using AI for fintech clients?2/4
  5. 05AI-driven reputation management vs human-led communications: which works better in the fintech sector?0/4
  6. 06Alternatives to AI-powered strategic communications for managing reputation in the financial sector?0/4
  7. 07How do payment companies use AI-powered PR to manage investor and partner perceptions?0/4
  8. 08What are some alternatives to AI-enhanced PR for fintech brand visibility?0/4
  9. 09How can AI improve communications initiatives for companies in the US payments space?0/4
  10. 10How do traditional PR agencies compare with AI-enhanced PR services for financial firms?0/4
  11. 11How can financial services firms improve their media presence with AI-powered communications strategies?0/4
  12. 12Do AI-powered communications services deliver better outcomes for banking sector reputation management?0/4
  13. 13What are the best AI-driven PR solutions for fintech companies seeking to boost visibility?1/4
  14. 14Is it worth investing in AI-enhanced public relations for a mid-size fintech business?0/4
  15. 15How can fintech companies address low engagement rates from a recent AI-driven communications strategy?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 1/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 2/15All assistants: 3/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

Claudenamed the company

“What pricing tiers exist for strategic communications agencies using AI for fintech clients?”

… Some AI-enhanced agencies like Pitchr.ai typically run $5,000 to $15,000 per month retainers, with project work and advisor engagements priced separately.

The premium pricing reflects the compliance expertise, dual media landscape (tech and finance press), and increasingly, AI search optimization capabilities that fintech communications require.

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Gregory FCA
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Pitchr.ai
    75.0%
  2. Gregory FCA
    25.0%
  3. Vested
    0.0%
  4. Forefront Communications
    0.0%
  5. Ivy McLemore & Associates
    0.0%
  6. Rasky Partners
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    authoritytech.io
    24
  2. 02
    slicedbrand.com
    10
  3. 03
    everything-pr.com
    9
  4. 04
    fullyvested.com
    5
  5. 05
    wolf.financial
    5
  6. 06
    5wpr.com
    5
  7. 07
    mexicobusiness.news
    4
  8. 08
    gradient-labs.ai
    4
  9. 09
    pitchr-ai.com (its own website)
    4
  10. 10
    cracklepr.com
    4

Pitchr.ai is in the study as an agency.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Pitchr.ai compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
16

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
32
Ranks 108 of 346. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 77 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 96 of 346. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with agencies

64 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
32
Ranks 18 of 64. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 10 of 64. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 24 of 64. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Pitchr.ai publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 32 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.pitchr-ai.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 13 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*partly
  • ClaudeBot*partly
  • Anthropic-AI*partly
  • Google-Extended*partly
  • Applebot-Extended*partly
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*partly
  • FacebookBot*partly
  • Bytespider*partly
  • CCBot*partly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibot*partly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbot*partly
  • YouBot*partly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBot*partly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Pitchr.ai as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 32 of 100 badge for Pitchr.ai

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/pitchr-ai.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/pitchr-ai.com.svg" alt="Overall score 32 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo