Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

PayGlocal Technologies

payglocal.in

Payment processors, acquirers and point of saleCards and payments

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
614 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
42nd of 203 payment processors
Closing balance

Named in

10of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for PayGlocal Technologies

AI assistants name this payment processor in 16.7% of answers, which is higher than the typical company in its sector. It has an overall score of 35 out of 100, ranking 614th of 2,219 companies. Its website passes 8 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned PayGlocal Technologies by name. AI assistants named it in 10 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 49th of 375 in its sector. The typical cards and payments company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
35Overall score
  • Visibility16
  • Citations5
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness57
Summary of account
Named by AI in
16.7%
10 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
14.9%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
8/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
88 of 375
by overall score, where the typical cards and payments company scores 27

Get the full report on PayGlocal Technologies as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

PayGlocal Technologies came up on 8 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Are RBI-authorised cross-border payment solutions secure for collecting payments from overseas clients?0/4
  2. 02What are the top cross-border payment solutions for Indian exporters working with US clients?1/4
  3. 03Common reasons for international card payments failing for Indian exporters0/4
  4. 04Is a full-stack cross-border payment platform worth it for Indian exporters collecting payments from the US?0/4
  5. 05What are some non-bank methods for Indian enterprises to receive foreign payments?0/4
  6. 06How does cross-border payment infrastructure compare to traditional bank wire transfers for Indian enterprises?1/4
  7. 07How can Indian enterprises automate FIRA and FIRC documentation for incoming international payments?1/4
  8. 08Why do some cross-border payments from the US to India get delayed in processing?0/4
  9. 09Solutions to streamline tax compliance when receiving global payments in India0/4
  10. 10Are there affordable options for small Indian exporters to collect international payments?1/4
  11. 11What fees should Indian businesses expect when using cross-border payment infrastructure for US clients?0/4
  12. 12Ways for Indian service providers to offer Apple Pay and Google Pay to international clients2/4
  13. 13Alternatives to international payment gateways for Indian companies collecting from US customers2/4
  14. 14Best ways for Indian businesses to accept international payments online1/4
  15. 15International payment gateways vs. multi-currency payment aggregators for Indian businesses1/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 2/15Gemini: 6/15All assistants: 10/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Ways for Indian service providers to offer Apple Pay and Google Pay to international clients”

Indian service providers can offer Apple Pay and Google Pay to overseas clients by using an international payment gateway that supports wallet payments—rather than integrating directly with Apple or Google.

Practical options

Use an Indian international payment gateway: Providers such as Razorpay, Cashfree and PayGlocal advertise Apple Pay support for eligible cross-border transactions. Approval generally requires business KYC, IEC/export documentation and an enabled international-payments account.

Use hosted checkout or payment links: This is the fastest route …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Razorpay
    18
  2. 02
    PayU
    7
  3. 03
    Airwallex
    3
  4. 04
    Cashfree Payments
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Razorpay
    40.3%
  2. Cashfree Payments
    26.9%
  3. PayGlocal Technologies
    14.9%
  4. PayU
    10.4%
  5. Airwallex
    6.0%
  6. Worldline India
    1.5%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    xflowpay.com
    42
  2. 02
    razorpay.com
    33
  3. 03
    skydo.com
    29
  4. 04
    payglocal.in (its own website)
    15
  5. 05
    rbi.org.in
    12
  6. 06
    wise.com
    10
  7. 07
    cashfree.com
    9
  8. 08
    xtransfer.com
    9
  9. 09
    payoneer.com
    8
  10. 10
    easebuzz.in
    7

PayGlocal Technologies is in the study as a payment processor.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
6/15
Claude
2/15
Perplexity
2/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How PayGlocal Technologies compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
16

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
5

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
57

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with cards and payments companies

375 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
35
Ranks 88 of 375. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
16.7%
Ranks 49 of 375. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
57
Ranks 4 of 375. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with payment processors

203 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
35
Ranks 42 of 203. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
16.7%
Ranks 17 of 203. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
57
Ranks 2 of 203. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. PayGlocal Technologies publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogPublished
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check

The website runs on WooCommerce.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
100 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersPassed

    HTTP Link headers on the homepage that point agents at machine readable resources.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
75 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationPassed

    Requests sent with Accept: text/markdown receive a markdown version of the page.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPartly met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
17 of 100
  • API CatalogPassed

    A linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog listing APIs, specs and docs.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 59 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · payglocal.in · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

8 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • PassedAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 12 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*allowed
  • ClaudeBot*allowed
  • Anthropic-AI*allowed
  • Google-Extended*allowed
  • Applebot-Extended*allowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBot*allowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBot*allowed
  • PerplexityBot*allowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*allowed
  • Claude-User*allowed
  • Perplexity-User*allowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on PayGlocal Technologies as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 35 of 100 badge for PayGlocal Technologies

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/payglocal.in"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/payglocal.in.svg" alt="Overall score 35 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo