Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
2,167 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

0of 60, its tower is dark

by 0 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Orbital

AI assistants do not name this cross-border payments provider in any of their 60 answers. Orbital has an overall score of 21 out of 100, ranking 2,167th of 2,219 companies in the study. How ready its website is for AI tools could not be measured, as the study's automated check was turned away.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Orbital by name. AI assistants named it in none of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 179th of 375 in its sector. The typical cards and payments company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
21Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality67
  • AI readiness0
Summary of account
Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
n/a
the website turned our check away
Rank in its sector
354 of 375
by overall score, where the typical cards and payments company scores 27

Get the full report on Orbital as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Orbital came up on 0 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Manual methods for tracking creditor claims versus digital case management solutions0/4
  2. 02Best insolvency case management tools for administrators handling multiple bankruptcy proceedings0/4
  3. 03What should a creditor do if they can't access their claim online in a bankruptcy case?0/4
  4. 04Typical workflow for submitting and tracking bankruptcy claims through an online portal0/4
  5. 05Common issues with submitting insolvency claims through online portals and how to resolve them0/4
  6. 06What should you look for when choosing a digital platform for managing creditor claims during bankruptcy?0/4
  7. 07Most secure options for creditors to submit sensitive bankruptcy documents online0/4
  8. 08What are the most reliable online portals for creditors to submit insolvency claims in the US?0/4
  9. 09How do web-based creditor portals compare to traditional paper-based insolvency case management?0/4
  10. 10Is subscribing to an insolvency case management portal worth it for small creditor firms?0/4
  11. 11Average cost to use a creditor portal for managing insolvency cases in the US0/4
  12. 12Differences between standalone insolvency management software and integrated creditor portals0/4
  13. 13Are there free or low-cost insolvency administration tools available for small practitioners?0/4
  14. 14Alternatives to using an online platform for managing bankruptcy cases as a creditor0/4
  15. 15How do insolvency administrators use digital portals to streamline communication with creditors?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 0/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

Claudedid not name the company

“Best insolvency case management tools for administrators handling multiple bankruptcy proceedings”

I'll search for information about the best insolvency case management tools for administrators.Based on current reviews and industry recommendations, here are the best insolvency case management tools for administrators handling multiple bankruptcy proceedings:

Top General Legal Practice Management Platforms

Clio Manage - Provides case management, calendaring, document management, intake, time tracking, and billing workflows used by law firms handling insolvency and bankruptcy matters.

PracticePanther - Delivers legal case management with client intake, task and calendar automati …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Named instead

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Stretto
    5

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Stretto
    46.7%
  2. Prime Clerk (part of Kroll Restructuring Administration)
    26.7%
  3. Bankruptcy Management Solutions (BMS)
    20.0%
  4. Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions
    6.7%
  5. Orbital
    0.0%
  6. KCC (Kurtzman Carson Consultants)
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    stp.one
    13
  2. 02
    worldmetrics.org
    9
  3. 03
    turnkey-ips.com
    6
  4. 04
    softwareadvice.com
    5
  5. 05
    wifitalents.com
    5
  6. 06
    aryza.com
    5
  7. 07
    gitnux.org
    5
  8. 08
    canb.uscourts.gov
    4
  9. 09
    insb.uscourts.gov
    4
  10. 10
    epiqglobal.com
    4

Orbital is in the study as a cross-border payments provider.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Orbital compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
67

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
0

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with cards and payments companies

375 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
21
Ranks 354 of 375. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 179 of 375. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
0
Ranks 363 of 375. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with cross-border payments providers

84 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
21
Ranks 83 of 84. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 33 of 84. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
0
Ranks 84 of 84. Typical company: 29
AI readinessSection 09

The checks behind the AI readiness score

AI readiness could not be measured. The website turned away our automated check, so none of the 14 checks could run. That reflects the website’s rules for automated visitors, not what the website contains.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Orbital as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo