Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
396 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

8of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for OneNotary

AI assistants name this fintech infrastructure company in 13.3% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 38 out of 100, ranking 396th of 2,219 companies, and 127th of 574 companies in its sector. Its website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned OneNotary by name. AI assistants named it in 8 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 89th of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
38Overall score
  • Visibility13
  • Citations5
  • Sentiment81
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
Summary of account
Named by AI in
13.3%
8 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
13.6%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
127 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on OneNotary as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

OneNotary came up on 3 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Are digital notarization services worth it for small businesses needing regular document validation?0/4
  2. 02Which virtual notary platforms offer 24/7 availability for urgent legal documents?3/4
  3. 03How can remote notarization help with estate planning paperwork from home?0/4
  4. 04Is the cost of online notary services justified for single document needs?1/4
  5. 05What are some alternatives to digital notarization for remote document validation?0/4
  6. 06How do remote notarization and in-person notarization differ in terms of security?0/4
  7. 07Online notary vs traditional notary: which is more convenient for busy professionals?0/4
  8. 08How can I troubleshoot camera or audio problems during a virtual notarization appointment?0/4
  9. 09Can an online notary service be used to complete an I-9 employment verification form?0/4
  10. 10How does remote notarization work for power of attorney documents?0/4
  11. 11What are the best online notary services for real estate transactions in the US?4/4
  12. 12What is the typical price range for virtual notary services for individuals in the US?0/4
  13. 13What should I do if my online notarization session fails due to identity verification issues?0/4
  14. 14Is mobile notary service a good alternative for those unable to use video calls?0/4
  15. 15Are there extra fees for notarizing multiple documents at once online?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 3/15Gemini: 2/15All assistants: 8/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

OpenAInamed the company

“What are the best online notary services for real estate transactions in the US?”

Short answer — the most widely used, trusted remote online notarization (RON) / eClosing providers for U.S. real‑estate transactions are Proof (formerly Notarize), NotaryCam (a Stewart company), DocuSign Notary, Snapdocs (RON/Notary Connect), OneNotary, and Pavaso/Simplifile-type eClosing vendors. Which is “best” depends on whether you’re an individual signer, a title/escrow company, a lender, or a high-volume integrator. (proof.com)

Quick comparison (what each is used for)

Proof (Notarize)

Common choice for consumer signings and remote closings; …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    NotaryCam
    9
  2. 02
    BlueNotary
    8
  3. 03
    Notarize
    5
  4. 04
    DocuSign Notary
    2

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Notarize
    42.4%
  2. BlueNotary
    15.3%
  3. OneNotary
    13.6%
  4. NotaryCam
    13.6%
  5. DocuSign Notary
    11.9%
  6. OnlineNotary.net
    3.4%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    bluenotary.us
    18
  2. 02
    notarycam.com
    13
  3. 03
    onenotary.com (its own website)
    12
  4. 04
    notaron.com
    10
  5. 05
    notarylive.com
    7
  6. 06
    legalclarity.org
    7
  7. 07
    proof.com
    6
  8. 08
    docusign.com
    6
  9. 09
    notaryhub.com
    5
  10. 10
    notarize.com
    5

OneNotary is in the study as a fintech infrastructure company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
3/15
Claude
2/15
Gemini
2/15
OpenAI
1/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How OneNotary compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
13

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
5

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
81

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
38
Ranks 127 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
13.3%
Ranks 89 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 401 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with fintech infrastructure companies

315 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
38
Ranks 54 of 315. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
13.3%
Ranks 34 of 315. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 215 of 315. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

We could not tell. The website turned away our requests for the files an agent would read. An agent arriving by itself is turned away the same way.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPCould not check
  • UCPCould not check
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardCould not check
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check
  • Agent SkillsCould not check
  • API CatalogCould not check
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 37 of 100 · 65% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · onenotary.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on OneNotary as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 38 of 100 badge for OneNotary

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/onenotary.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/onenotary.com.svg" alt="Overall score 38 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo