Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
265 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
4th of 22 crypto exchanges
Closing balance

Named in

4of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Omnia Exchange

AI assistants name Omnia Exchange in 6.7% of answers, which is above the 1.7% for the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 40 out of 100, ranking 265th of 2,219 companies in the study. The website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Omnia Exchange by name. AI assistants named it in 4 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 37th of 102 in its sector. The typical crypto and digital asset company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
40Overall score
  • Visibility17
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness21
Summary of account
Named by AI in
6.7%
4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
57.1%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
11 of 102
by overall score, where the typical crypto and digital asset company scores 30

Get the full report on Omnia Exchange as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Omnia Exchange came up on 3 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Are OTC desks a good alternative to integrated cross-asset liquidity platforms for large trades?0/4
  2. 02Is it worth using a cross-asset liquidity solution with 24/7 access for institutional trading?0/4
  3. 03Cross-asset liquidity versus spot exchanges: which is better for high-volume businesses?0/4
  4. 04Which platforms support real-time, no downtime asset exchanges for businesses in the United States?1/4
  5. 05What are the best cross-asset liquidity platforms for institutions looking to trade both fiat and digital assets?2/4
  6. 06What are typical use cases for 24/7 institutional-grade liquidity in digital assets and fiat currencies?0/4
  7. 07How are fees and spreads typically structured on cross-asset liquidity platforms for institutions in the US?0/4
  8. 08What alternatives exist to dedicated institutional liquidity platforms for seamless digital asset exchange?0/4
  9. 09Are there minimum trade size requirements or monthly fees for using institutional cross-asset trading APIs?0/4
  10. 10What should I look for in an institutional-grade liquidity platform for multi-asset trading?0/4
  11. 11How do you resolve downtime issues on multi-asset trading platforms?0/4
  12. 12How does institutional cross-asset liquidity differ from single-asset liquidity solutions?1/4
  13. 13What are common causes of failed trades on cross-asset liquidity APIs and how can they be fixed?0/4
  14. 14How can a business benefit from integrating cross-asset value transfer into its operations?0/4
  15. 15Which platforms offer seamless exchange between fiat, cryptocurrencies, and stablecoins via a single API for businesses?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 1/15All assistants: 4/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What are the best cross-asset liquidity platforms for institutions looking to trade both fiat and digital assets?”

For institutions needing one workflow across fiat, FX, stablecoins, cryptocurrencies, and tokenized assets, the strongest current shortlist is:

Platform · Best fit · Why consider it

Omnia Exchange · Broadest cross-asset trading mandate · Provides a single API for FX, cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and tokenized assets, with both traditional and blockchain connectivity.

Ripple Prime · Macro funds and cross-margining · Reported as a multi-asset prime-brokerage option for combining crypto with CME derivatives, FX, metals, and repo positions.

oneZer …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Fireblocks
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Omnia Exchange
    57.1%
  2. Talos
    28.6%
  3. Fireblocks
    14.3%
  4. Copper.co
    0.0%
  5. BitGo
    0.0%
  6. Gemini (Gemini Prime)
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    b2broker.com
    17
  2. 02
    f6s.com
    6
  3. 03
    coincodex.com
    5
  4. 04
    linkedin.com
    5
  5. 05
    chain.link
    5
  6. 06
    chainstack.com
    4
  7. 07
    walletinvestor.com
    4
  8. 08
    omniaexchange.com (its own website)
    4
  9. 09
    nuvei.com
    4
  10. 10
    finchtrade.com
    4

Omnia Exchange is in the study as a crypto exchange.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
2/15
Gemini
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Omnia Exchange compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
17

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with crypto and digital asset companies

102 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
40
Ranks 11 of 102. Typical company: 30
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 37 of 102. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 76 of 102. Typical company: 33
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with crypto exchanges

22 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
40
Ranks 3 of 22. Typical company: 35
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 10 of 22. Typical company: 5.0%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 17 of 22. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Omnia Exchange publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · omniaexchange.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Omnia Exchange as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 40 of 100 badge for Omnia Exchange

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/omniaexchange.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/omniaexchange.com.svg" alt="Overall score 40 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo