Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Oliver Wyman

oliverwyman.com

Consultancies and professional servicesAdvisers and services

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
326 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
15th of 177 consultancies
Closing balance

Named in

5of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Oliver Wyman

AI assistants name Oliver Wyman in 8.3% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is not named at all. Its overall score is 39 out of 100, ranking 326th of 2,219 companies. The website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Oliver Wyman by name. AI assistants named it in 5 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 53rd of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
39Overall score
  • Visibility8
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
8.3%
5 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
7.1%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
31 of 346
by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on Oliver Wyman as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Oliver Wyman came up on 3 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Do senior business leaders really benefit from external strategic advice?0/4
  2. 02How does strategy consulting differ from operations consulting for Fortune 500 companies?1/4
  3. 03Alternatives to traditional management consulting for strategic decision-making support0/4
  4. 04Are day rates or project-based fees more common for large-scale consulting projects?0/4
  5. 05Is hiring a management consulting firm worth it for organizational restructuring?0/4
  6. 06What are some non-consulting approaches to enterprise-wide transformation?0/4
  7. 07Best consulting expertise for large enterprises undergoing digital transformation0/4
  8. 08How can management consulting help with AI risk management in financial services?0/4
  9. 09Best management consultants specializing in anti-financial crime solutions1/4
  10. 10Challenges enterprises face when implementing consulting recommendations0/4
  11. 11How to address low ROI after a major consulting engagement?0/4
  12. 12Management consulting vs advisory services for government modernization projects0/4
  13. 13What are the top management consulting firms for complex business strategy in the US?3/4
  14. 14What is the typical cost structure for top-tier management consulting in the United States?0/4
  15. 15Examples of consulting-led transformations in public sector organizations0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 1/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 2/15All assistants: 5/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What are the top management consulting firms for complex business strategy in the US?”

… Oliver Wyman — Excellent for financial services, risk, regulation, transportation, and analytically intensive strategy problems.

Strategy& — Strong for corporate strategy connected to operating-model design and implementation, with access to PwC’s broader capabilities.

EY-Parthenon — Particularly well suited to growth strategy, mergers and acquisitions, commercial due diligence, and portfolio strategy.

Kearney — Strong in operations-led strategy, procurement, supply chain, manufacturing, and performance improvement.

L.E.K. Consulting — A leading choice for marke …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Bain & Company
    3
  2. 02
    McKinsey & Company
    3
  3. 03
    Deloitte Consulting
    2
  4. 04
    Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. McKinsey & Company
    24.3%
  2. Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
    22.9%
  3. Deloitte Consulting
    20.0%
  4. Bain & Company
    18.6%
  5. Oliver Wyman
    7.1%
  6. Strategy& (part of PwC)
    7.1%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    consulting.us
    5
  2. 02
    casebasix.com
    5
  3. 03
    pwc.com
    4
  4. 04
    ey.com
    4
  5. 05
    deloitte.com
    4
  6. 06
    consultingdemand.com
    4
  7. 07
    worldmetrics.org
    4
  8. 08
    linkedin.com
    4
  9. 09
    bcg.com
    4
  10. 10
    slideworks.io
    3

Oliver Wyman is in the study as a consultancy.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Oliver Wyman compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
8

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
39
Ranks 31 of 346. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
8.3%
Ranks 53 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 96 of 346. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with consultancies

177 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
39
Ranks 12 of 177. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
8.3%
Ranks 19 of 177. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 48 of 177. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

We could not tell. The website turned away our requests for the files an agent would read. An agent arriving by itself is turned away the same way.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPCould not check
  • UCPCould not check
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardCould not check
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check
  • Agent SkillsCould not check
  • API CatalogCould not check
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 55 of 100 · 66% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.oliverwyman.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Oliver Wyman as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 39 of 100 badge for Oliver Wyman

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/oliverwyman.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/oliverwyman.com.svg" alt="Overall score 39 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo