Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 and 10, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1,467 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

1of 60 answers

by 1 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Max My Interest

AI assistants rarely name this personal finance app, mentioning it in just 1 of 60 answers; they also mention Betterment Cash Reserve in the same answer. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, ranking 1,467th of 2,219 companies, while the typical company in its sector scores 28. Its website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Max My Interest by name. AI assistants named it in 1 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 156th of 394 in its sector. The typical banking company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
26Overall score
  • Visibility3
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness14
Summary of account
Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
6.3%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
243 of 394
by overall score, where the typical banking company scores 28

Get the full report on Max My Interest as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Max My Interest came up on 1 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Alternatives to digital cash management platforms for maximizing FDIC-insured cash returns0/4
  2. 02Why isn’t my cash yield increasing after using a cash management service?0/4
  3. 03Best practices for managing multiple bank accounts through a single cash management dashboard0/4
  4. 04Top cash management solutions for financial advisors serving affluent clients1/4
  5. 05What should affluent individuals look for when choosing an online cash management solution?0/4
  6. 06What options exist for earning more on idle cash beyond technology-enabled cash management apps?0/4
  7. 07How can financial advisors help clients optimize cash yields using technology-driven cash management?0/4
  8. 08How do digital cash management platforms compare to high-yield savings accounts for earning interest?0/4
  9. 09Where can individuals in the US access innovative solutions for earning more on safe cash deposits?0/4
  10. 10Are there any hidden costs to be aware of with digital cash solutions promising higher interest rates?0/4
  11. 11Managed cash accounts vs traditional bank accounts: which offers better safety and returns?0/4
  12. 12Common issues when linking external bank accounts to digital cash management platforms0/4
  13. 13Is using a digital cash management platform worth it for people with large cash balances?0/4
  14. 14What are typical fees and minimums for digital cash management platforms in the US?0/4
  15. 15What are the best digital cash management platforms for maximizing yield on FDIC-insured deposits?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 1/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Top cash management solutions for financial advisors serving affluent clients”

For advisors serving affluent clients, the strongest cash-management toolkit usually combines insured deposit solutions, automated cash sweeps, Treasury and money-market access, and lending integration rather than relying on one account.

Top solutions to evaluate

Solution · Best for · Key strengths · Watch-outs

MaxMyInterest · High-balance personal, trust, and family-office cash · Automated bank-deposit allocation, rate monitoring, and broad bank access; it also integrates with advisor technology such as Redtail. · Review fees, participating-bank limits, …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Betterment Cash Reserve
    3

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Betterment Cash Reserve
    56.3%
  2. Insured Cash Sweep (ICS) by IntraFi
    37.5%
  3. Max My Interest
    6.3%
  4. StoneCastle's FICA For Advisors
    0.0%
  5. Flourish Cash
    0.0%
  6. Aspiration Spend & Save
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    bankrate.com
    14
  2. 02
    finance.yahoo.com
    12
  3. 03
    cnbc.com
    10
  4. 04
    nerdwallet.com
    10
  5. 05
    fidelity.com
    8
  6. 06
    finder.com
    7
  7. 07
    investopedia.com
    6
  8. 08
    kitces.com
    5
  9. 09
    brex.com
    5
  10. 10
    wealthvieu.com
    5

Max My Interest is in the study as a personal finance app.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
1/15
Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Max My Interest compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
3

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with banking companies

394 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
26
Ranks 243 of 394. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
1.7%
Ranks 156 of 394. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
14
Ranks 335 of 394. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with personal finance apps

30 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
26
Ranks 20 of 30. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
1.7%
Ranks 18 of 30. Typical company: 4.2%
AI readiness
14
Ranks 25 of 30. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Max My Interest publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
12 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 10 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.maxmyinterest.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on Max My Interest as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo