Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
417 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

4of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Kasada

AI assistants name this fraud and identity company in 6.7% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 38 out of 100, ranking 417th of 2,219 companies and 127th of 574 in its sector. Its website passes 9 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Kasada by name. AI assistants named it in 4 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 155th of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
38Overall score
  • Visibility7
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment83
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness64
Summary of account
Named by AI in
6.7%
4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
7.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
9/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
127 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on Kasada as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Kasada came up on 3 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Best approaches to preventing fake account creation on a large online retail platform?0/4
  2. 02Are enterprise-level bot mitigation systems effective for reducing online abuse risk?1/4
  3. 03Bot management versus traditional web application firewalls—what's the difference for fraud prevention?0/4
  4. 04Options for fraud and abuse prevention if API security platforms are too expensive?0/4
  5. 05Is investing in a dedicated automated threat detection platform worth it for financial institutions?0/4
  6. 06What are the best bot and fraud prevention platforms for protecting APIs?1/4
  7. 07What pricing models are available for web and API security solutions in the US?0/4
  8. 08Leading solutions for automated threat defense for large ecommerce websites?0/4
  9. 09Why isn't my current bot management system stopping sophisticated automated attacks?0/4
  10. 10How do digital businesses block scraping and credential stuffing without hurting user experience?0/4
  11. 11Common reasons bot protection fails to prevent account takeovers?0/4
  12. 12How much do bot and fraud prevention platforms typically cost for large enterprises?2/4
  13. 13How does account takeover protection compare to credential stuffing defense in enterprise security?0/4
  14. 14Alternatives to behavioral analysis for detecting automated threats?0/4
  15. 15What are the top approaches besides challenge-response methods for defeating online bots?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 1/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 2/15All assistants: 4/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

Gemininamed the company

“Are enterprise-level bot mitigation systems effective for reducing online abuse risk?”

Despite substantial investments, enterprise-level bot mitigation systems struggle to effectively reduce online abuse risk, with many companies experiencing significant revenue losses due to bot attacks kasada.io.

Key findings highlight the challenges:

Rapid Efficacy Loss Two-thirds (63%) of companies experienced at least one bot attack in the past year, even with bot defenses in place. Only 20% of organizations reported their new bot mitigation solution was still effective after 12 mont …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Imperva
    9
  2. 02
    Cloudflare Bot Management
    3
  3. 03
    Akamai Bot Manager
    2

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Cloudflare Bot Management
    33.3%
  2. Akamai Bot Manager
    24.6%
  3. Imperva
    21.1%
  4. PerimeterX (now HUMAN Security)
    8.8%
  5. Kasada
    7.0%
  6. F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense (formerly Shape Security)
    5.3%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    radware.com
    15
  2. 02
    cequence.ai
    9
  3. 03
    datadome.co
    9
  4. 04
    imperva.com
    8
  5. 05
    akamai.com
    8
  6. 06
    humansecurity.com
    7
  7. 07
    aws.amazon.com
    7
  8. 08
    nhimg.org
    6
  9. 09
    f5.com
    6
  10. 10
    cside.com
    5

Kasada is in the study as a fraud and identity company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
Claude
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Kasada compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
7

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
83

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
64

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
38
Ranks 127 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 155 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
64
Ranks 3 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with fraud and identity companies

171 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
38
Ranks 45 of 171. Typical company: 30
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 43 of 171. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
64
Ranks 2 of 171. Typical company: 36
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 4: Agent-integrated. At least one of an MCP card, A2A card, skills index or API catalog is published.

To reach level 5:
  • Web Bot Auth
  • 4 of MCP Server Card, A2A Agent Card, Agent Skills, API Catalog
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Kasada publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardPublished
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsPublished
  • API CatalogPublished
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
100 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersPassed

    HTTP Link headers on the homepage that point agents at machine readable resources.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
100 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationPassed

    Requests sent with Accept: text/markdown receive a markdown version of the page.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
68 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsPassed

    Content-Signal lines in robots.txt declaring search, AI input and AI training preferences.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
80 of 100
  • API CatalogPassed

    A linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog listing APIs, specs and docs.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdPassed

    An auth.md describing how agents register and authenticate.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardPassed

    A server card describing the MCP server, its transport and capabilities.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsPassed

    A skills index at /.well-known/agent-skills/index.json that agents can load.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 87 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.kasada.io · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

9 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • PassedAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Kasada as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 38 of 100 badge for Kasada

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/kasada.io"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/kasada.io.svg" alt="Overall score 38 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo