Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1,146 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

0of 60, its tower is dark

by 0 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for HashKey On-Chain

AI assistants do not name this digital asset infrastructure company in any of the 60 answers, while they often name firms like Kraken, Coinbase, and Gemini. Its overall score is 28 out of 100, ranking 1,146th of 2,219 companies studied. The website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned HashKey On-Chain by name. AI assistants named it in none of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 67th of 102 in its sector. The typical crypto and digital asset company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
28Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality100
  • AI readiness14
Summary of account
Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
59 of 102
by overall score, where the typical crypto and digital asset company scores 30

Get the full report on HashKey On-Chain as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

HashKey On-Chain came up on 0 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What should I do if my identity verification isn't accepted when registering on a licensed platform?0/4
  2. 02Is it worth using a licensed crypto exchange for everyday trading in the US?0/4
  3. 03What alternatives exist to traditional crypto exchanges for buying bitcoin with USD?0/4
  4. 04How can I find a secure crypto platform to buy bitcoin and ethereum with USD?0/4
  5. 05How can retail traders securely store digital assets purchased on a licensed crypto platform?0/4
  6. 06How does a fully regulated cryptocurrency exchange compare to peer-to-peer trading apps?0/4
  7. 07What are the best regulated cryptocurrency exchanges for trading with fiat in the United States?0/4
  8. 08Licensed virtual asset exchanges vs unregulated crypto platforms—what are the main differences?0/4
  9. 09What types of trading fees should I expect on regulated cryptocurrency exchanges?0/4
  10. 10Are deposit and withdrawal charges common on fiat-to-crypto trading platforms for US users?0/4
  11. 11Which virtual asset trading platforms offer identity verification and compliance features for US users?0/4
  12. 12What’s the easiest way for US residents to convert USD to crypto on a regulated exchange?0/4
  13. 13Why might my bank transfer to a regulated crypto exchange be delayed?0/4
  14. 14Where else can retail investors trade top cryptocurrencies securely besides licensed exchanges?0/4
  15. 15Are compliant digital asset platforms safer for beginners than decentralized alternatives?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 0/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

Claudedid not name the company

“Is it worth using a licensed crypto exchange for everyday trading in the US?”

I'll search for current information about licensed crypto exchanges and their benefits for everyday trading in the US.Yes, using a licensed crypto exchange for everyday trading in the US is generally worth it, though there are trade-offs to consider.

Key Benefits:

Licensed exchanges offer stronger consumer protections and reliable USD rails. A regulated crypto exchange shifts from a "trust-based" model to a "verification-based" model where legal compliance is the ultimate security feature. Additionally, regulated entities provide clear, upfront pricing for services, and licensed crypto c …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Named instead

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Kraken
    17
  2. 02
    Coinbase
    17
  3. 03
    Gemini
    15
  4. 04
    Binance.US
    10
  5. 05
    Bitstamp
    8

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Coinbase
    27.8%
  2. Kraken
    27.8%
  3. Binance.US
    16.7%
  4. Gemini
    15.6%
  5. Bitstamp
    12.2%
  6. HashKey On-Chain
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    cryptoslate.com
    12
  2. 02
    coinbureau.com
    9
  3. 03
    paybis.com
    8
  4. 04
    finder.com
    8
  5. 05
    bitget.com
    8
  6. 06
    osl.com
    5
  7. 07
    money.com
    5
  8. 08
    crypto.com
    5
  9. 09
    cryptovantage.com
    4
  10. 10
    binance.us
    4

HashKey On-Chain is in the study as a digital asset infrastructure company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How HashKey On-Chain compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
100

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with crypto and digital asset companies

102 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
28
Ranks 59 of 102. Typical company: 30
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 67 of 102. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
14
Ranks 95 of 102. Typical company: 33
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with digital asset infrastructure companies

80 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
28
Ranks 44 of 80. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 51 of 80. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
14
Ranks 74 of 80. Typical company: 36
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. HashKey On-Chain publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.hashkey.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on HashKey On-Chain as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo