Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
446 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

1of 60 answers

by 1 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Ground

AI assistants rarely name this digital asset infrastructure company, mentioning it in 1 of 60 answers. In that answer, Meow is also named. Its overall score is 38 out of 100, ranking 446th of 2,219 companies and 21st of 102 in its sector. The website passes 4 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Ground by name. AI assistants named it in 1 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 50th of 102 in its sector. The typical crypto and digital asset company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
38Overall score
  • Visibility7
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
50.0%
of the mentions of it and its 4 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
21 of 102
by overall score, where the typical crypto and digital asset company scores 30

Get the full report on Ground as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Ground came up on 1 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Best non-custodial approaches to generating yield on stablecoins for businesses wanting to avoid centralized platforms0/4
  2. 02How can businesses handle discrepancies between reported and actual yield from tokenized stablecoin funds?0/4
  3. 03What are effective strategies for fintechs to automate stablecoin asset allocation across multiple pools?0/4
  4. 04Are stablecoin cash management solutions with embedded yield worth the investment for developers handling client funds?0/4
  5. 05Is using tokenized funds for cash management better than keeping stablecoins in a standard crypto wallet?0/4
  6. 06What should a fintech company consider before switching to a unified stablecoin cash management dashboard?0/4
  7. 07What are the best stablecoin cash management platforms for crypto businesses seeking yield and liquidity?0/4
  8. 08How do pricing tiers typically work for enterprise-level stablecoin cash management services in the US?0/4
  9. 09What alternatives exist to unified stablecoin asset dashboards for managing crypto treasury operations?0/4
  10. 10How do API-based solutions help fintech companies manage stablecoin assets efficiently?0/4
  11. 11How can crypto businesses optimize working capital using stablecoin cash management tools?0/4
  12. 12Why might stablecoin balances not appear as fully liquid on cash management platforms?0/4
  13. 13Which stablecoin cash management platforms offer live yield transparency and compliance features for US-based companies?1/4
  14. 14Are there extra costs involved in integrating a stablecoin asset management API with your existing systems?0/4
  15. 15Stablecoin cash management vs traditional cash management platforms: what are the key differences for businesses?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 1/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Which stablecoin cash management platforms offer live yield transparency and compliance features for US-based companies?”

For US-based companies, the strongest matches are:

Platform · Live yield transparency · Compliance and controls · Best fit

Ground · Displays current yield rates and supports APY, liquidity, and utilization monitoring with configurable risk rules. · Granular, searchable, exportable reporting through its dashboard and API. · Fintechs and companies needing programmable stablecoin risk controls

Crossmint · Converts idle balances into yield-generating stablecoins and advertises current target returns of roughly 3–4%. · Handles licensing, AML, sanctions, …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Meow
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Ground
    50.0%
  2. Meow
    50.0%
  3. OpenTrade
    0.0%
  4. Starlight
    0.0%
  5. Hedgey
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    eco.com
    24
  2. 02
    stripe.com
    19
  3. 03
    fireblocks.com
    16
  4. 04
    fintechspecs.com
    9
  5. 05
    bitgo.com
    8
  6. 06
    upshift.finance
    8
  7. 07
    crossmint.com
    7
  8. 08
    circle.com
    6
  9. 09
    f6s.com
    6
  10. 10
    investax.io
    5

Ground is in the study as a digital asset infrastructure company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
1/15
Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Ground compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
7

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with crypto and digital asset companies

102 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
38
Ranks 21 of 102. Typical company: 30
Named in answers
1.7%
Ranks 50 of 102. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 52 of 102. Typical company: 33
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with digital asset infrastructure companies

80 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
38
Ranks 14 of 80. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
1.7%
Ranks 37 of 80. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 42 of 80. Typical company: 36
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Ground publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 36 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.groundtech.co · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Ground as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo