Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Goldman Sachs

goldmansachs.comGS

Investment banks and capital marketsInvesting and wealth

Money20/20 attendeeS&P 500

Also in the US AI Visibility Study

Statement period
September 23 to 29, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1,026 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
16th of 27 investment banks
Closing balance

Named in

3of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Goldman Sachs

AI assistants name Goldman Sachs in 5% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in its sector, named in 0.8% of answers. Its overall score is 28 out of 100, ranking 1,026th of 2,219 companies studied. The Goldman Sachs website passes 4 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Goldman Sachs by name. AI assistants named it in 3 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 58th of 238 in its sector. The typical investing and wealth company is named in 0.8% of answers.

Overall score
28Overall score
  • Visibility8
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
17.6%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
104 of 238
by overall score, where the typical investing and wealth company scores 28

Get the full report on Goldman Sachs as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Goldman Sachs came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Best options besides private banking for managing significant personal wealth0/4
  2. 02Is it worth using a full-service investment banking firm for corporate M&A advice?0/4
  3. 03How do investment banking advisory fees usually work for mergers and acquisitions?0/4
  4. 04Use-cases for private wealth management for business owners in the US0/4
  5. 05How does private banking compare to traditional retail banking for institutional investors?0/4
  6. 06When should a business consider working with a global investment banking partner?0/4
  7. 07Best ways high-net-worth individuals can access private wealth management in the US1/4
  8. 08Typical fee structures for asset management firms in the United States0/4
  9. 09Alternatives to using a traditional asset management firm for portfolio growth0/4
  10. 10What should you do if your asset management account has unexpected fees?0/4
  11. 11What are alternative ways for corporations to access enterprise financial platform solutions?0/4
  12. 12Are enterprise platform solutions for financial services a good value for mid-sized companies?0/4
  13. 13Differences between investment banking and asset management for corporate clients0/4
  14. 14How can institutional investors resolve issues with delayed securities transactions?0/4
  15. 15What are the key services offered by a top investment banking and asset management firm?2/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 1/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 1/15All assistants: 3/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Best ways high-net-worth individuals can access private wealth management in the US”

… Go through your current bank or brokerage and ask for its private wealth or family office team; major institutions like JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Goldman Sachs all offer specialized wealth services for high- and ultra-high-net-worth clients.

Work with a dedicated private wealth firm that focuses on affluent families and complex planning needs; firms such as Bernstein, Northern Trust, and CIBC Private Wealth position themselves around personalized service for high-net-worth clients.

Use a referral from your accountant, estate attorney, or busin …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Morgan Stanley
    3
  2. 02
    UBS
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. J.P. Morgan
    35.3%
  2. Morgan Stanley
    23.5%
  3. Goldman Sachs
    17.6%
  4. Bank of America (Bank of America Merrill Lynch)
    17.6%
  5. UBS
    5.9%
  6. Citigroup
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    sec.gov
    17
  2. 02
    smartasset.com
    15
  3. 03
    morganstanley.com
    10
  4. 04
    jpmorgan.com
    9
  5. 05
    investopedia.com
    9
  6. 06
    corporatefinanceinstitute.com
    8
  7. 07
    hubbis.com
    8
  8. 08
    tradersmagazine.com
    7
  9. 09
    advisor.morganstanley.com
    6
  10. 10
    stonex.com
    6

Goldman Sachs is in the study as an investment bank.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
1/15
Gemini
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Goldman Sachs compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
8

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with investing and wealth companies

238 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
28
Ranks 104 of 238. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 58 of 238. Typical company: 0.8%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 51 of 238. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with investment banks

27 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
28
Ranks 15 of 27. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 14 of 27. Typical company: 5.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 8 of 27. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Goldman Sachs publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
73 of 100
  • robots.txtPartly met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 31 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · goldmansachs.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 2 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*partly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*partly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Goldman Sachs as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 28 of 100 badge for Goldman Sachs

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/goldmansachs.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/goldmansachs.com.svg" alt="Overall score 28 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo