Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Gemini

gemini.com

Crypto exchanges and tradingCrypto and digital assets

Statement period
October 9, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
741 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
13th of 22 crypto exchanges
Closing balance

Named in

3of 60 answers

by 2 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Gemini

AI assistants name this crypto exchange in 5% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 33 out of 100, ranking 741st of 2,219 companies studied. The website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Gemini by name. AI assistants named it in 3 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 40th of 102 in its sector. The typical crypto and digital asset company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
33Overall score
  • Visibility5
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment69
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
4.3%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
39 of 102
by overall score, where the typical crypto and digital asset company scores 30

Get the full report on Gemini as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Gemini came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Is using a platform that combines crypto trading, prediction markets, and rewards worth it for casual investors?0/4
  2. 02Staking rewards vs rewards from prediction markets — which offers better returns for US crypto investors?0/4
  3. 03What are the best crypto trading platforms for US investors who want prediction markets and staking rewards?2/4
  4. 04How do prediction markets work for sports, politics, and tech outcomes in US crypto platforms?0/4
  5. 05Crypto trading versus prediction market platforms — which is more profitable for active traders?0/4
  6. 06What are some alternatives to all-in-one platforms that combine trading, predictions, and crypto rewards?0/4
  7. 07Does adding crypto prediction markets to your trading strategy make sense for long-term gains?0/4
  8. 08Where can I find US crypto services that focus specifically on prediction markets and not regular trading?0/4
  9. 09Why can’t I access all features on a US-based crypto trading and prediction platform?0/4
  10. 10How do transaction fees for prediction markets compare to fees for regular crypto trades in the US?1/4
  11. 11What are practical ways to use staking and earning features alongside standard crypto trading?0/4
  12. 12How can I get started with prediction markets as a beginner in crypto trading?0/4
  13. 13Are there decentralized options for accessing both staking rewards and prediction markets in the US?0/4
  14. 14What should I do if staking rewards haven’t shown up in my crypto platform account?0/4
  15. 15Are there zero-fee crypto trading options that also let you participate in prediction markets?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 3/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

OpenAInamed the company

“What are the best crypto trading platforms for US investors who want prediction markets and staking rewards?”

Short answer — there’s no single “perfect” US platform that dominates both worlds, but you have two practical approaches:

Use a regulated prediction‑market venue for event contracts (Kalshi, Polymarket US, PredictIt, Fanatics/FanDuel/FanDuel‑style offerings), and use a major US exchange for staking rewards (Coinbase, Kraken, Gemini, Crypto.com). (agamble.com)

Which platforms to consider (what they give you and why)

1) Kalshi — best‑in‑class regulated prediction markets

What: CFTC‑regulated Designated Contract Market for yes/no event contracts …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Kalshi
    24
  2. 02
    Coinbase
    18
  3. 03
    Kraken
    13
  4. 04
    PredictIt
    3

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Kalshi
    36.2%
  2. Coinbase
    26.1%
  3. Kraken
    20.3%
  4. Robinhood Crypto
    8.7%
  5. Gemini
    4.3%
  6. PredictIt
    4.3%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    thelines.com
    20
  2. 02
    cryptoslate.com
    19
  3. 03
    crypto.com
    16
  4. 04
    kraken.com
    14
  5. 05
    trustwallet.com
    12
  6. 06
    actionnetwork.com
    11
  7. 07
    si.com
    11
  8. 08
    dimers.com
    9
  9. 09
    bitcoinfoundation.org
    8
  10. 10
    cftc.gov
    8

Gemini is in the study as a crypto exchange.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
2/15
OpenAI
1/15
Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Gemini compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
5

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
69

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with crypto and digital asset companies

102 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
33
Ranks 39 of 102. Typical company: 30
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 40 of 102. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 52 of 102. Typical company: 33
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with crypto exchanges

22 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
33
Ranks 13 of 22. Typical company: 35
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 11 of 22. Typical company: 5.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 11 of 22. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Gemini publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtCould not check
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtCould not check

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 28 of 100 · 86% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.gemini.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Gemini as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 33 of 100 badge for Gemini

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/gemini.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/gemini.com.svg" alt="Overall score 33 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo