AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026

Account holder

Fulton Financial

fult.comFULT

Regional and community banks Banking

Also in the US AI Visibility Study

Statement period: September 23 to 26, 2026; when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.: 869 of 2,219; its rank by overall score
Place in its category: 33rd of 148 regional and community banks

Closing balance

Named in

3of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Fulton Financial

AI assistants name this regional or community bank in 5% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is never named. Its overall score is 30 out of 100, ranking 869th of 2,219 companies. The website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Fulton Financial by name. AI assistants named it in 3 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 112th of 394 in its sector. The typical banking company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score

Visibility11
Citations0
Sentiment50
Site quality87
AI readiness21

Summary of account

Named by AI in: 5.0%; 3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions: 27.3%; of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness: 1/14; technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector: 136 of 394; by overall score, where the typical banking company scores 28

Get the full report on Fulton Financial as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line items01

Every question, and where the company came up

Fulton Financial came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

01Best options for managing payroll as a small business with a local banking partner?0/4
02Steps to resolve login issues with online banking at a Mid-Atlantic regional bank?0/4
03What should I do if my debit card stops working at a regional bank?0/4
04What fees are common with personal checking accounts at regional banks in the Northeast?0/4
05What are the best regional banks in the Mid-Atlantic for small business checking accounts?2/4
06Alternatives to regional brick-and-mortar banks for wealth management in the Mid-Atlantic?0/4
07Best non-traditional ways to access credit if you don’t bank with a large regional or community institution?0/4
08Most recommended local institutions for wealth management services in Pennsylvania or New Jersey?0/4
09How do credit unions compare to regional full-service banks for personal loans?0/4
10How important is FDIC insurance when choosing a local bank for personal savings?0/4
11Regional bank vs national bank for business banking needs—what are the key differences?0/4
12Online banking options to consider instead of local banks for business transactions?0/4
13How do regional banks support first-time homebuyers in Delaware or Maryland?1/4
14Is opening a business checking account at a regional bank worth it for small businesses?0/4
15Typical minimum balance requirements for business savings accounts at community banks?0/4

Total named1/151/151/150/153/60

named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detail02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“How do regional banks support first-time homebuyers in Delaware or Maryland?”

… Affordable loan structures: Banks such as WSFS, Fulton, and Meridian advertise first-time buyer mortgages, low down payments, and in some cases up to 97% financing or other flexible mortgage options.
Support for lower-income or first-generation buyers: Artisans’ Bank’s community initiatives include programs for modest-income buyers and first-time or first-generation homebuyers, plus FHA-backed options and settlement assistance.
Credit help and borrower education: Artisans’ Bank offers a Credit Builder Loan for people with poor or no cred …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Payees03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Share of mentions

CompanyShare

M&T Bank
54.5%
Fulton Financial
27.3%
WSFS Bank
18.2%
First National Bank (FNB)
0.0%
OceanFirst Bank
0.0%
Univest Bank and Trust Co.
0.0%

Referrers04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

01
regions.com
59
02
bankrate.com
16
03
nerdwallet.com
14
04
forbes.com
13
05
smartasset.com
13
06
justdial.com
11
07
usbank.com
10
08
sofi.com
9
09
wise.com
8
10
fdic.gov
8

Fulton Financial is in the study as a regional or community bank.

By assistant05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity

1/15

Claude

1/15

OpenAI

1/15

Gemini

0/15

Market comparison06

How Fulton Financial compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sector07

Compared with banking companies

394 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score

Ranks 136 of 394. Typical company: 28

Named in answers

5.0%

Ranks 112 of 394. Typical company: 0.0%

AI readiness

Ranks 199 of 394. Typical company: 29

Against its category08

Compared with regional and community banks

148 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score

Ranks 31 of 148. Typical company: 27

Named in answers

5.0%

Ranks 29 of 148. Typical company: 0.0%

AI readiness

Ranks 68 of 148. Typical company: 21

AI agents09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

0Not yet agent-ready
1Basic web presence
2Bot-aware
3Agent-readable
4Agent-integrated
5Agent-native

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:

2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers

Can an AI agent check out here?

We could not tell. The website turned away our requests for the files an agent would read. An agent arriving by itself is turned away the same way.

Agent payment protocols

x402Not present
MPPCould not check
AP2Not present
ACPCould not check
UCPNot present

Interfaces for AI agents

MCP Server CardCould not check
A2A Agent CardCould not check
Agent SkillsCould not check
API CatalogNot present
llms.txtNot present
WebMCPCould not check

Show every check, for your technical team

Discoverability

41 of 100

robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
study: 86.1%
SitemapNot met
Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.
study: 87.9%
Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
study: 1.5%
DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
study: 4.3%

Content accessibility

0 of 100

Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
study: 6.2%
llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
study: 31.0%

Bot access control

32 of 100

AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
study: 92.7%
Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
study: 2.3%
Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
study: 0.3%

APIs, auth and MCP

0 of 100

API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
study: 1.3%
OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
study: 6.3%
OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
study: 5.3%
auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
study: 0.2%
MCP Server CardCould not check
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
study: 0.8%
A2A Agent CardCould not check
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
study: 0.2%
Agent SkillsCould not check
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
study: 1.0%
WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
study: 0.0%
ARD manifestCould not check
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
study: 0.2%

Score 20 of 100 · 79% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.fultonbank.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readiness10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%

Take it with you

Get the full report on Fulton Financial as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Share11

Share this result

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/fult.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/fult.com.svg" alt="Overall score 30 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>

End of statement

All 2,219 companies How we measured this

Fulton Financial

What this means for Fulton Financial

Get the full report on Fulton Financial as a PDF

Every question, and where the company came up

What Perplexity actually said

Where the mentions went

Share of mentions

Websites the AI used as sources

Which AI assistants named the company

How Fulton Financial compares with all 2,219 companies

What makes up the score

Compared with banking companies

Compared with regional and community banks

Ready for AI agents

The checks behind the AI readiness score

Discoverability

Content Accessibility

Bot Access Control

API / Auth / MCP

Get the full report on Fulton Financial as a PDF

Share this result

Want AI assistants to name your company?