Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

FTV Capital

ftvcapital.com

Private equity and alternative investmentsInvesting and wealth

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
593 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
12th of 74 private equity firms
Closing balance

Named in

2of 60 answers

by 1 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for FTV Capital

The AI assistants rarely name FTV Capital, appearing in 2 out of 60 answers. In the same answers, assistants also name Summit Partners and TA Associates. FTV Capital has an overall score of 36 out of 100, ranking 593rd of 2,219 companies. Its website passes 7 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned FTV Capital by name. AI assistants named it in 2 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 82nd of 238 in its sector. The typical investing and wealth company is named in 0.8% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
36Overall score
  • Visibility5
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment75
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness50
Summary of account
Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
11.1%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
7/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
51 of 238
by overall score, where the typical investing and wealth company scores 28

Get the full report on FTV Capital as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

FTV Capital came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What should I know before raising growth capital for my fintech business?0/4
  2. 02How does growth equity compare to venture capital for mid-stage tech companies looking to expand?0/4
  3. 03What is the typical investment size and cost structure for growth equity deals in the US?0/4
  4. 04How can a growth equity partner help scale a cybersecurity platform?0/4
  5. 05What are the best growth equity investment firms for scaling enterprise technology companies?1/4
  6. 06Top factors to consider when choosing a growth capital partner for a financial technology business0/4
  7. 07Common challenges entrepreneurs face during the growth equity investment process0/4
  8. 08How do management fees and carried interest work in growth equity investments?0/4
  9. 09How to resolve misalignment between management teams and growth equity investors0/4
  10. 10Ways growth equity firms support digital transformation in enterprise SaaS companies0/4
  11. 11Best growth capital resources for US-based financial services businesses seeking expansion1/4
  12. 12Growth equity funds vs. private equity for late-stage software companies — key differences0/4
  13. 13Is partnering with a growth equity investment firm worth it for a payments startup seeking rapid expansion?0/4
  14. 14What are non-dilutive funding options for mature fintech companies besides growth equity?0/4
  15. 15Alternatives to traditional growth equity financing for scaling a technology company0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 2/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 2/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Best growth capital resources for US-based financial services businesses seeking expansion”

… FTV Capital and other financial-services growth-equity funds · Profitable or late-stage fintech, payments, insurance, wealth-management, and software-enabled services companies · Minority or majority equity, strategic introductions, M&A support, and industry expertise. Sector-focused investors can offer relationships across banks, insurers, and enterprise buyers.

General Atlantic and larger growth-equity firms · Companies with substantial scale, strong product-market fit, and national or international expansion plans · Large equity checks, operating expertise, institutional …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Summit Partners
    4
  2. 02
    Insight Partners
    3
  3. 03
    TA Associates
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Insight Partners
    38.9%
  2. Summit Partners
    33.3%
  3. TA Associates
    16.7%
  4. FTV Capital
    11.1%
  5. Great Hill Partners
    0.0%
  6. Battery Ventures
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    qubit.capital
    16
  2. 02
    ctacquisitions.com
    15
  3. 03
    privateequitylist.com
    8
  4. 04
    rho.co
    8
  5. 05
    angelinvestorsnetwork.com
    8
  6. 06
    growthcapadvisory.com
    7
  7. 07
    venturecapitalcareers.com
    7
  8. 08
    linkedin.com
    4
  9. 09
    re-cap.com
    4
  10. 10
    dealroom.net
    3

FTV Capital is in the study as a private equity firm.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
2/15
Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How FTV Capital compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
5

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
75

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
50

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with investing and wealth companies

238 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
36
Ranks 51 of 238. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
3.3%
Ranks 82 of 238. Typical company: 0.8%
AI readiness
50
Ranks 1 of 238. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with private equity firms

74 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
36
Ranks 11 of 74. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
3.3%
Ranks 17 of 74. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
50
Ranks 1 of 74. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. FTV Capital publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check

The website runs on WooCommerce.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
8 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPartly met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 47 of 100 · 94% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · ftvcapital.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

7 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 6 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBot*allowed
  • PerplexityBot*allowed
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*allowed
  • Claude-User*allowed
  • Perplexity-User*allowed
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on FTV Capital as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo