Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Flagright

flagright.com

Fraud, identity and complianceFinancial technology and data

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
683 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
72nd of 171 fraud and identity companies
Closing balance

Named in

6of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Flagright

AI assistants name this fraud and identity company in 10% of answers, more often than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 34 out of 100, ranking 683rd of 2,219 companies. The website passes 6 of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Flagright by name. AI assistants named it in 6 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 118th of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
34Overall score
  • Visibility13
  • Citations8
  • Sentiment60
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness43
Summary of account
Named by AI in
10.0%
6 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
19.4%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
212 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on Flagright as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Flagright came up on 4 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What pricing models are common for AI-based AML compliance solutions in the US?0/4
  2. 02How can I resolve issues integrating an AI AML platform with my existing banking systems?0/4
  3. 03What are the top AI-powered platforms for anti-money laundering compliance?1/4
  4. 04Leading platforms with built-in case management for anti-money laundering compliance3/4
  5. 05How does transaction monitoring differ from dynamic risk scoring in compliance platforms?0/4
  6. 06What should I consider before choosing an AML compliance solution for my business?0/4
  7. 07What other options exist besides automated rule engines for detecting suspicious activity?0/4
  8. 08Is investing in an AI financial crime compliance platform worth it for small financial institutions?0/4
  9. 09Alternatives to AI-driven platforms for meeting financial crime compliance requirements1/4
  10. 10Why isn't my automated case management system detecting suspicious transactions?0/4
  11. 11Are subscription-based platforms more cost-effective for ongoing transaction monitoring needs?0/4
  12. 12AI agents vs rule engines for regulatory filing: which is more effective?0/4
  13. 13Examples of regulatory filing tasks that can be automated in financial crime compliance0/4
  14. 14Best financial crime compliance solutions for fintech companies1/4
  15. 15How do fintech startups typically use dynamic risk scoring to improve compliance?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 2/15Claude: 1/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 2/15All assistants: 6/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

Claudenamed the company

“Alternatives to AI-driven platforms for meeting financial crime compliance requirements”

I'll search for current alternatives to AI-driven platforms for financial crime compliance.Based on my research, here's a comprehensive overview of alternatives to AI-driven platforms for meeting financial crime compliance requirements:

Platform-Based Alternatives

Specialized Software Solutions (Non-AI Focus)

Flagright offers a unified platform handling transaction monitoring, case management, watchlist screening, dynamic risk scoring, and regulatory filing, with compliance teams able to build and modify detection rules using a no-code rule builder and automate SAR filing.

Other not …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    ComplyAdvantage
    11
  2. 02
    Unit21
    5
  3. 03
    Feedzai
    4
  4. 04
    Alloy
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. ComplyAdvantage
    41.9%
  2. Unit21
    22.6%
  3. Flagright
    19.4%
  4. Feedzai
    9.7%
  5. Alloy
    6.5%
  6. Socure
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    flagright.com (its own website)
    19
  2. 02
    ondato.com
    9
  3. 03
    sphinxhq.com
    8
  4. 04
    complyadvantage.com
    7
  5. 05
    datavisor.com
    6
  6. 06
    helpware.com
    5
  7. 07
    symphonyai.com
    5
  8. 08
    binderr.com
    3
  9. 09
    amlwatcher.com
    3
  10. 10
    getmonetizely.com
    3

Flagright is in the study as a fraud and identity company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
OpenAI
2/15
Claude
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Flagright compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
13

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
8

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
60

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
34
Ranks 212 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
10.0%
Ranks 118 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 29 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with fraud and identity companies

171 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
34
Ranks 71 of 171. Typical company: 30
Named in answers
10.0%
Ranks 30 of 171. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 11 of 171. Typical company: 36
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Flagright publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
100 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersCould not check

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
100 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationCould not check

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 51 of 100 · 81% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.flagright.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 3 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBot*allowed
  • Applebot*allowed
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Flagright as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 34 of 100 badge for Flagright

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/flagright.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/flagright.com.svg" alt="Overall score 34 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo