Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
3 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
1st of 64 agencies
Closing balance

Named in

21of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for The Fintech Marketing Hub

AI assistants name this agency in 35% of answers, compared with 0% for the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 55 out of 100, ranking 3rd of 2,219 companies and 1st in its sector. The website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned The Fintech Marketing Hub by name. AI assistants named it in 21 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 2nd of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
55Overall score
  • Visibility50
  • Citations12
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness36
Summary of account
Named by AI in
35.0%
21 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
87.5%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
1 of 346
by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on The Fintech Marketing Hub as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

The Fintech Marketing Hub came up on 9 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are the best online communities for fintech marketing professionals in the US?4/4
  2. 02How can US fintech marketers use online communities to stay updated on industry trends?2/4
  3. 03Are there free community platforms for fintech marketing professionals in the US?4/4
  4. 04How do global fintech marketing forums differ from local US-based groups?0/4
  5. 05What are good options for US fintech marketers who want industry events without joining a professional community platform?0/4
  6. 06How do you find trustworthy, spam-free fintech marketing peer groups online?3/4
  7. 07What should I do if I'm not getting value from my current fintech marketing community platform?0/4
  8. 08Are fintech marketing networking platforms worth joining for career growth?1/4
  9. 09Do community-driven platforms provide more value for fintech marketers than paid memberships?1/4
  10. 10How can new fintech marketing leaders build connections within the US industry online?2/4
  11. 11What are the most common ways fintech marketers use professional forums to find mentors?0/4
  12. 12What alternatives exist to structured fintech marketing online communities for networking?0/4
  13. 13Is there a difference between general marketing communities and those focused specifically on fintech marketing?0/4
  14. 14How can I find peer groups for sharing fintech marketing strategies?3/4
  15. 15What price range should I expect for premium access to a fintech marketing professional community?1/4
Total namedOpenAI: 2/15Claude: 6/15Perplexity: 7/15Gemini: 6/15All assistants: 21/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Are there free community platforms for fintech marketing professionals in the US?”

Yes. The strongest free options for US-based fintech marketing professionals are:

Fintech Marketing Hub / FMH Inner Network — Free “Brand Insider” access for in-house fintech marketers, including peer groups, networking, events, and member resources. It is specifically designed for practitioners at fintech, payments, crypto, and embedded-finance companies; vendors and agencies generally are not eligible for the free insider tier.

FinTech Marketing Community — Offers free individual or team memberships for professionals in finance and technology marketing, strategy, and business …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Financial Brand Forum
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. The Fintech Marketing Hub
    87.5%
  2. Financial Brand Forum
    12.5%
  3. Financial Communications Society (FCS)
    0.0%
  4. American Bankers Association (ABA) – Bank Marketing Network
    0.0%
  5. CMO Council – Financial Services Marketing Community
    0.0%
  6. Digital Finance Professionals Network (DFPN)
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    fintechmarketingcommunity.com
    57
  2. 02
    fintechmarketinghub.com (its own website)
    27
  3. 03
    linkedin.com
    15
  4. 04
    toprankmarketing.com
    6
  5. 05
    thehiveindex.com
    5
  6. 06
    slofile.com
    4
  7. 07
    thecmo.com
    4
  8. 08
    metia.com
    4
  9. 09
    moldstud.com
    2
  10. 10
    gtm8020.com
    2

The Fintech Marketing Hub is in the study as an agency.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
7/15
Claude
6/15
Gemini
6/15
OpenAI
2/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How The Fintech Marketing Hub compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
50

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
12

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
55
Ranks 1 of 346. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
35.0%
Ranks 2 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 38 of 346. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with agencies

64 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
55
Ranks 1 of 64. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
35.0%
Ranks 1 of 64. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 11 of 64. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. The Fintech Marketing Hub publishes a UCP profile with checkout, but the profile lists no way to pay. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPCould not check
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPCould not check
  • UCPPublished
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardCould not check
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check
  • Agent SkillsCould not check
  • API CatalogCould not check
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check

The website runs on Wix.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdCould not check

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 54 of 100 · 63% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.fintechmarketinghub.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on The Fintech Marketing Hub as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 55 of 100 badge for The Fintech Marketing Hub

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/fintechmarketinghub.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/fintechmarketinghub.com.svg" alt="Overall score 55 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo