Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
635 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
33rd of 177 consultancies
Closing balance

Named in

4of 60 answers

by 2 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Everest Group

AI assistants name this consultancy in 6.7% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is not named at all. Its overall score is 35 out of 100, ranking 635th of 2,219 companies. The website passes 6 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Everest Group by name. AI assistants named it in 4 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 62nd of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
35Overall score
  • Visibility7
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment75
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness43
Summary of account
Named by AI in
6.7%
4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
7.3%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
80 of 346
by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on Everest Group as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Everest Group came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are alternatives to subscribing to a business and technology research consultancy?0/4
  2. 02What should I do if a research subscription isn’t meeting our strategic needs?0/4
  3. 03Is investing in a business and technology research membership worth it for a mid-sized company?0/4
  4. 04How do business research consultancies differ from technology advisory firms?0/4
  5. 05In what scenarios should a healthcare company use professional research services for technology adoption?0/4
  6. 06How much does a typical annual membership for a business research consultancy cost in the US?0/4
  7. 07Which firms specialize in business and technology research for large enterprises?2/4
  8. 08Business research consultancies vs management consulting for digital transformation projects—what's the difference?0/4
  9. 09What should executives consider before subscribing to a research consultancy?0/4
  10. 10Are there any free or lower-cost ways for enterprises to access reliable technology market analysis?0/4
  11. 11What are the best global research consultancies for enterprise technology leaders?2/4
  12. 12How can mid-sized companies get strategic insights without a full research consultancy membership?0/4
  13. 13How can global research firms help with sourcing and vendor management strategies?0/4
  14. 14What pricing models do research firms offer for enterprise access to published reports?0/4
  15. 15Why are my research insights not actionable for our enterprise IT decisions?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 2/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 2/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 4/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What are the best global research consultancies for enterprise technology leaders?”

The strongest global research consultancies for enterprise technology leaders are Gartner, Forrester, IDC, ISG, Everest Group, and Info-Tech Research Group. The best choice depends on whether the priority is vendor selection, technology strategy, sourcing, market intelligence, or practical execution.

Consultancy · Best for · Why enterprise leaders use it

Gartner · Broad CIO research and vendor evaluation · Extensive coverage across IT strategy, cybersecurity, cloud, data, applications, and emerging technology; especially useful for executive decision frameworks and …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Gartner
    13
  2. 02
    Forrester Research
    3
  3. 03
    HFS Research
    2

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Forrester Research
    34.5%
  2. Gartner
    29.1%
  3. IDC (International Data Corporation)
    16.4%
  4. Everest Group
    7.3%
  5. ISG (Information Services Group)
    7.3%
  6. HFS Research
    5.5%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    worldmetrics.org
    8
  2. 02
    wifitalents.com
    7
  3. 03
    vendr.com
    6
  4. 04
    dupple.com
    5
  5. 05
    zipdo.co
    4
  6. 06
    vantainsights.com
    4
  7. 07
    everestgrp.com (its own website)
    4
  8. 08
    explodingtopics.com
    4
  9. 09
    linkedin.com
    3
  10. 10
    precedenceresearch.com
    3

Everest Group is in the study as a consultancy.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
2/15
Perplexity
2/15
Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Everest Group compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
7

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
75

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
35
Ranks 80 of 346. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 62 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 13 of 346. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with consultancies

177 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
35
Ranks 31 of 177. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 26 of 177. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 4 of 177. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Everest Group publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
100 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersCould not check

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
10 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 30 of 100 · 92% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · everestgrp.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 5 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*blocked
  • ClaudeBot*allowed
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extended*blocked
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBot*blocked
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*blocked
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Everest Group as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 35 of 100 badge for Everest Group

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/everestgrp.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/everestgrp.com.svg" alt="Overall score 35 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo