Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
2,152 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
186th of 203 payment processors
Closing balance

Named in

0of 60, its tower is dark

by 0 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for E‑Squared Systems

The AI assistants do not name this payment processor in any of the 60 answers. Its overall score is 21 out of 100, ranking 2,152nd of 2,219. The study could not measure how ready its website is for AI tools because the website turned away the automated check.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned E‑Squared Systems by name. AI assistants named it in none of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 179th of 375 in its sector. The typical cards and payments company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
21Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality67
  • AI readiness0
Summary of account
Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
n/a
the website turned our check away
Rank in its sector
354 of 375
by overall score, where the typical cards and payments company scores 27

Get the full report on E‑Squared Systems as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

E‑Squared Systems came up on 0 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Best use-cases for custom machine learning solutions in retail businesses0/4
  2. 02Low-code or no-code solutions as alternatives to traditional mobile app development0/4
  3. 03What should I look for when choosing a systems integration partner?0/4
  4. 04Custom web development vs off-the-shelf website builders: which is better for a growing business?0/4
  5. 05Is investing in a fully custom business app worth it for a mid-sized company?0/4
  6. 06Common challenges in web application integration and how to solve them0/4
  7. 07How does microservice architecture compare to traditional integration approaches?0/4
  8. 08Alternatives to hiring a custom development agency for a new web project0/4
  9. 09How much does end-to-end integration for multiple enterprise systems usually cost?0/4
  10. 10Top-rated mobile app development services for startups in the US0/4
  11. 11Examples of responsive web apps for healthcare or e-commerce businesses0/4
  12. 12What are the best custom software development agencies for small businesses?0/4
  13. 13Why might a mobile app fail to sync properly with existing business systems?0/4
  14. 14Who offers custom CRM development for businesses needing unique workflows?0/4
  15. 15Typical pricing for custom software development services in the United States0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 0/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

The company is not named in this answer

Perplexitydid not name the company

“Top-rated mobile app development services for startups in the US”

For a US startup, these mobile app development firms are strong candidates based on current industry listings, startup focus, ratings, and full-cycle capabilities:

Company · Best suited for · Notable details

Utility · Funded startups needing strategy through launch · New York firm focused on end-to-end product development, including iOS, Android, and React Native.

ChopDawg.com · Startups seeking a dedicated app-development specialist · Listed among the leading US startup app developers; reported rates are approximately $50–$99/hour.

Appinventiv …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Named instead

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Simpalm
    1
  2. 02
    Intellectsoft
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Intellectsoft
    50.0%
  2. Simpalm
    25.0%
  3. BairesDev
    25.0%
  4. E‑Squared Systems
    0.0%
  5. Altar.io
    0.0%
  6. ArcTouch
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    lowcode.agency
    4
  2. 02
    cygnet.one
    4
  3. 03
    linkedin.com
    4
  4. 04
    clutch.co
    3
  5. 05
    reddit.com
    3
  6. 06
    spd.tech
    3
  7. 07
    netguru.com
    3
  8. 08
    ijsat.org
    2
  9. 09
    unicoconnect.com
    2
  10. 10
    cubix.co
    2

E‑Squared Systems is in the study as a payment processor.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How E‑Squared Systems compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
67

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
0

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with cards and payments companies

375 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
21
Ranks 354 of 375. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 179 of 375. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
0
Ranks 363 of 375. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with payment processors

203 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
21
Ranks 185 of 203. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 91 of 203. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
0
Ranks 192 of 203. Typical company: 29
AI readinessSection 09

The checks behind the AI readiness score

AI readiness could not be measured. The website turned away our automated check, so none of the 14 checks could run. That reflects the website’s rules for automated visitors, not what the website contains.

Take it with you

Get the full report on E‑Squared Systems as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo