Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Elliptic

elliptic.co

Fraud, identity and complianceFinancial technology and data

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
97 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
13th of 171 fraud and identity companies
Closing balance

Named in

19of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Elliptic

AI assistants name this fraud and identity company in 31.7% of answers, which is much more often than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 43 out of 100, ranking 97th of 2,219 overall and 34th of 574 in its sector. Its website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Elliptic by name. AI assistants named it in 19 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 20th of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
43Overall score
  • Visibility28
  • Citations4
  • Sentiment83
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
31.7%
19 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
24.4%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
34 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on Elliptic as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Elliptic came up on 7 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How much does blockchain analytics software typically cost for mid-sized financial institutions?3/4
  2. 02What are common ways crypto exchanges use blockchain analytics for regulatory reporting?0/4
  3. 03What are the best blockchain analytics platforms for financial crime risk management?4/4
  4. 04How do government agencies use blockchain intelligence to investigate illicit digital asset flows?1/4
  5. 05What features should financial institutions look for in blockchain analytics solutions?0/4
  6. 06Is it worth investing in crypto compliance software for a small crypto exchange?0/4
  7. 07Why does blockchain transaction monitoring sometimes miss suspicious activity?0/4
  8. 08Blockchain analytics vs crypto forensics: what's the difference for regulatory compliance?0/4
  9. 09Alternatives to blockchain analytics tools for managing crypto financial crime risk2/4
  10. 10Top crypto compliance tools for banks working with digital assets4/4
  11. 11How does on-chain risk intelligence compare to traditional transaction monitoring methods?0/4
  12. 12What options exist besides on-chain analytics for crypto asset compliance?0/4
  13. 13Are there affordable options for crypto compliance solutions for startups?1/4
  14. 14Best blockchain intelligence solutions that support both crypto and traditional financial systems4/4
  15. 15How can banks resolve false positives in crypto compliance monitoring?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 4/15Claude: 6/15Perplexity: 5/15Gemini: 4/15All assistants: 19/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Top crypto compliance tools for banks working with digital assets”

For banks, the strongest crypto-compliance shortlist is Chainalysis, TRM Labs, Elliptic, Notabene, ComplyAdvantage, and Sumsub or Jumio. The first three provide blockchain intelligence; the others cover Travel Rule messaging, sanctions/AML screening, and customer onboarding.

Tool · Best fit for banks · Core capabilities

Chainalysis · Broad enterprise AML and investigations · Know-your-transaction monitoring, configurable risk rules, real-time alerts, investigations, reporting, and exposure tracing.

TRM Labs · Complex investigations and fund-flow tracing …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    TRM Labs
    15
  2. 02
    Chainalysis
    13
  3. 03
    Scorechain
    7
  4. 04
    Coinfirm
    5

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Chainalysis
    25.6%
  2. TRM Labs
    25.6%
  3. Elliptic
    24.4%
  4. Scorechain
    11.5%
  5. Coinfirm
    7.7%
  6. CipherTrace (a Mastercard company)
    5.1%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    trmlabs.com
    25
  2. 02
    blocksec.com
    15
  3. 03
    sphinxhq.com
    15
  4. 04
    chainalysis.com
    13
  5. 05
    blockchain-council.org
    11
  6. 06
    elliptic.co (its own website)
    10
  7. 07
    nhimg.org
    8
  8. 08
    f6s.com
    7
  9. 09
    spark.money
    7
  10. 10
    fluxforce.ai
    7

Elliptic is in the study as a fraud and identity company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
6/15
Perplexity
5/15
Gemini
4/15
OpenAI
4/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Elliptic compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
28

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
4

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
83

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
43
Ranks 34 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
31.7%
Ranks 20 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 224 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with fraud and identity companies

171 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
43
Ranks 12 of 171. Typical company: 30
Named in answers
31.7%
Ranks 2 of 171. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 88 of 171. Typical company: 36
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Elliptic publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPCould not check
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdCould not check

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 37 of 100 · 95% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.elliptic.co · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Elliptic as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 43 of 100 badge for Elliptic

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/elliptic.co"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/elliptic.co.svg" alt="Overall score 43 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo