Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Curql Collective

curql.com

Venture capital and growth investorsInvesting and wealth

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
177 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
2nd of 59 venture capital firms
Closing balance

Named in

11of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Curql Collective

AI assistants name this venture capital firm in 18.3% of answers, which is much more often than the typical company in its sector at 0.8%. It has an overall score of 41 out of 100, ranking 177th of 2,219 companies and 13th in its sector. Its website passes 4 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Curql Collective by name. AI assistants named it in 11 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 15th of 238 in its sector. The typical investing and wealth company is named in 0.8% of answers.

Overall score
41Overall score
  • Visibility34
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment63
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
18.3%
11 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
78.6%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
13 of 238
by overall score, where the typical investing and wealth company scores 28

Get the full report on Curql Collective as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Curql Collective came up on 7 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are some alternatives to joining a dedicated fintech collaboration network for credit unions?1/4
  2. 02What’s the difference between a fintech accelerator and a fintech collaboration network for credit unions?0/4
  3. 03What should credit unions consider before joining a fintech ecosystem for collaborative investment?0/4
  4. 04Are there ongoing fees for credit unions in fintech collaboration platforms, or is it one-time participation pricing?0/4
  5. 05Which fintech collaboration models are most effective for credit union growth in the US?0/4
  6. 06Other ways credit unions can access innovative fintech solutions without formal investment platforms0/4
  7. 07Examples of credit unions leveraging fintech collaborations for member experience improvement1/4
  8. 08How can credit unions find new fintech partners to expand digital offerings?1/4
  9. 09Is using a fintech investment platform worth it for small credit unions?0/4
  10. 10Credit union fintech partnerships not delivering expected results—what could be going wrong?0/4
  11. 11What are the best fintech collaboration platforms for credit unions looking to drive innovation?1/4
  12. 12What challenges do credit unions face when integrating fintech solutions from collaborative platforms?0/4
  13. 13How do credit unions use fintech investment networks to stay competitive?2/4
  14. 14Fintech investment platforms vs traditional venture capital for credit unions—what are the key differences?2/4
  15. 15How much does it cost for a credit union to participate in a fintech investment consortium?3/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 5/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 5/15All assistants: 11/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“How much does it cost for a credit union to participate in a fintech investment consortium?”

There is no single published price for joining a fintech investment consortium; it depends on whether the credit union is paying for membership, making an investment commitment, or both.

Consortium/network membership: Curql Collective has been described as charging roughly $15,000–$20,000 annually for subscription access, although the exact current fee should be confirmed directly with the organization.

Investment capital: This is separate from the membership fee. A credit union may invest an individually negotiated amount in a fund or selected fintechs; one reported Cu …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Curql Collective
    78.6%
  2. CMFG Ventures
    14.3%
  3. TruStage Ventures (formerly CMFG Ventures Connect)
    7.1%
  4. Alloy Labs Alliance
    0.0%
  5. Reseda Group
    0.0%
  6. Fintech Forge
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    pymnts.com
    23
  2. 02
    cumanagement.com
    21
  3. 03
    creditunions.com
    16
  4. 04
    cu-2.com
    12
  5. 05
    cuinsight.com
    11
  6. 06
    americascreditunions.org
    10
  7. 07
    thefinancialbrand.com
    8
  8. 08
    experian.com
    6
  9. 09
    americanbanker.com
    6
  10. 10
    circuitcu.com
    6

Curql Collective is in the study as a venture capital firm.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
5/15
Gemini
5/15
Perplexity
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Curql Collective compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
34

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
63

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with investing and wealth companies

238 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
41
Ranks 13 of 238. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
18.3%
Ranks 15 of 238. Typical company: 0.8%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 51 of 238. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with venture capital firms

59 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
41
Ranks 2 of 59. Typical company: 26
Named in answers
18.3%
Ranks 1 of 59. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 10 of 59. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Curql Collective publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
0 of 100
  • robots.txtCould not check

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationCould not check

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
  • AI bot rulesCould not check

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsCould not check

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 0 of 100 · 56% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · curql.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Curql Collective as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 41 of 100 badge for Curql Collective

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/curql.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/curql.com.svg" alt="Overall score 41 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo