Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

CryptoLicense

cryptolicense.io

Consultancies and professional servicesAdvisers and services

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
573 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
29th of 177 consultancies
Closing balance

Named in

4of 60 answers

by 2 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for CryptoLicense

AI assistants name this consultancy in 6.7% of answers, which is higher than the typical company in its sector, which is named in 0%. Its overall score is 36 out of 100, ranking 573rd of 2,219. The company's website passes 7 of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned CryptoLicense by name. AI assistants named it in 4 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 62nd of 346 in its sector. The typical advisory or services firm is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
36Overall score
  • Visibility22
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness50
Summary of account
Named by AI in
6.7%
4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
100.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
7/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
69 of 346
by overall score, where the typical advisory or services firm scores 27

Get the full report on CryptoLicense as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

CryptoLicense came up on 4 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How does applying for a VASP registration differ from a traditional money transmitter license?0/4
  2. 02How can in-house legal teams handle crypto regulatory compliance without external consultants?0/4
  3. 03Why might a VASP license application get rejected and how can fintech firms address common issues?0/4
  4. 04Best practices for virtual asset service providers seeking regulatory compliance in the US and Europe0/4
  5. 05Options for fintech startups that cannot afford premium compliance and licensing advisory services0/4
  6. 06What are the key steps to obtain a cryptocurrency license for a fintech startup looking to operate internationally?0/4
  7. 07What compliance services are most important for startups issuing crypto debit cards?0/4
  8. 08What should crypto businesses do if their compliance documentation is found insufficient by regulators?0/4
  9. 09How can fintechs leverage a global crypto license to expand operations into new markets?0/4
  10. 10Alternatives to using a full-service crypto compliance consultancy for international license applications1/4
  11. 11How can specialized licensing consultants help speed up the process of international crypto licensing?1/4
  12. 12Is hiring a crypto compliance consultancy worth the investment for a new web3 business?0/4
  13. 13Differences between Swiss crypto licensing requirements and those in the EU for fintech companies0/4
  14. 14How do pricing models differ for one-time crypto license applications versus ongoing VASP compliance support?1/4
  15. 15What is the typical cost range for end-to-end crypto licensing consulting services in the US?1/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 1/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 3/15All assistants: 4/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

Gemininamed the company

“How do pricing models differ for one-time crypto license applications versus ongoing VASP compliance support?”

… One-Time Crypto License Application Costs

These are the expenses incurred to obtain authorization and typically include:

Company Incorporation: Notary fees, company registration, and establishing a registered office in the chosen jurisdiction crypto-license.io.

Regulatory Application/State Fee: A one-time fee paid to the regulator or ministry when filing the application. This can be a fixed amount, like a EUR 10,000 state fee in Estonia or CZK 20,000 (approx. EUR 800) in the Czech Republi …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. CryptoLicense
    100.0%
  2. CSB Group
    0.0%
  3. Suomen Rahankäyttö Oy (CryptoLicensing.eu)
    0.0%
  4. Global Blockchain Consulting
    0.0%
  5. iComply
    0.0%
  6. LegalNodes
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    fatf-gafi.org
    12
  2. 02
    consulting24.co
    9
  3. 03
    cryptoverselawyers.io
    7
  4. 04
    fincen.gov
    7
  5. 05
    chainup.com
    5
  6. 06
    innreg.com
    5
  7. 07
    sec.gov
    5
  8. 08
    fca.org.uk
    5
  9. 09
    cryptolicenses.net
    4
  10. 10
    legalbison.com
    4

CryptoLicense is in the study as a consultancy.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
Claude
1/15
Perplexity
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How CryptoLicense compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
22

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
50

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with advisory and services firms

346 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
36
Ranks 69 of 346. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 62 of 346. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
50
Ranks 3 of 346. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with consultancies

177 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
36
Ranks 27 of 177. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
6.7%
Ranks 26 of 177. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
50
Ranks 2 of 177. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. CryptoLicense publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check

The website runs on WooCommerce.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
18 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPartly met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 44 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · cryptolicense.io · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

7 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on CryptoLicense as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 36 of 100 badge for CryptoLicense

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/cryptolicense.io"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/cryptolicense.io.svg" alt="Overall score 36 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo