Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
CP

Coins.ph

coins.ph

Digital wallets and person to person paymentsCards and payments

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 11, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
163 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
6th of 29 digital wallets
Closing balance

Named in

22of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Coins.ph

AI assistants name this digital wallet in 36.7% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is named in 0% of answers. Its overall score is 41 out of 100, ranking 163rd of 2,219 companies. The website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Coins.ph by name. AI assistants named it in 22 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 18th of 375 in its sector. The typical cards and payments company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
41Overall score
  • Visibility29
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment81
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness21
Summary of account
Named by AI in
36.7%
22 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
17.7%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
31 of 375
by overall score, where the typical cards and payments company scores 27

Get the full report on Coins.ph as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Coins.ph came up on 9 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How can Filipino users buy load online while abroad?1/4
  2. 02Best platforms in the US for paying Philippine bills online1/4
  3. 03Are crypto trading features important when choosing a Filipino e-wallet?4/4
  4. 04How do exchange rates work when converting US dollars to Philippine pesos in e-wallet apps?0/4
  5. 05What are the typical fees for sending money to the Philippines using digital wallets?0/4
  6. 06How can I resolve failed money transfers from my US e-wallet to a Philippine account?0/4
  7. 07Is using a multi-currency e-wallet for remittances to the Philippines worth it?3/4
  8. 08Ways to pay Philippine utilities online from the US using a digital wallet4/4
  9. 09Non-crypto options for paying bills in the Philippines from the United States1/4
  10. 10What are the top digital wallets for Filipinos to send money back home?3/4
  11. 11Which digital wallets support both cash transactions and cryptocurrency trading for Filipinos?4/4
  12. 12Why is my online bill payment to the Philippines not processing through my digital wallet?0/4
  13. 13Digital wallet vs wire transfer: which is better for sending money to the Philippines?1/4
  14. 14How do crypto-enabled e-wallets differ from traditional digital wallets?0/4
  15. 15Alternatives to using an e-wallet for sending money to the Philippines0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 5/15Claude: 5/15Perplexity: 5/15Gemini: 7/15All assistants: 22/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Which digital wallets support both cash transactions and cryptocurrency trading for Filipinos?”

The clearest options for Filipinos are:

Coins.ph — The strongest all-in-one choice: supports everyday peso transactions such as QR Ph payments, bills, transfers, and cash-outs, while also allowing users to buy, sell, convert, and hold Bitcoin, USDT, and 170+ other crypto assets.

Maya — Supports regular e-wallet services and crypto trading in the Maya app, making it another option for users who want payments and digital assets in one platform.

GCash with GCrypto — GCash supports cashless payments, transfers, and other wallet services; its GCrypto feature enables buyi …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    GCash
    40
  2. 02
    Remitly
    23
  3. 03
    Western Union
    15

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. GCash
    34.7%
  2. Remitly
    20.2%
  3. Coins.ph
    17.7%
  4. PayMaya (now Maya)
    13.7%
  5. Western Union
    12.9%
  6. Binance P2P (Philippines)
    0.8%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    wise.com
    51
  2. 02
    remitly.com
    17
  3. 03
    facebook.com
    16
  4. 04
    moneymax.ph
    14
  5. 05
    respicio.ph
    11
  6. 06
    fintechnews.ph
    10
  7. 07
    pinoyloads.com
    10
  8. 08
    worldremit.com
    9
  9. 09
    coins.ph (its own website)
    9
  10. 10
    acemoneytransfer.com
    8

Coins.ph is in the study as a digital wallet.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
7/15
Claude
5/15
OpenAI
5/15
Perplexity
5/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Coins.ph compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
29

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
81

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with cards and payments companies

375 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
41
Ranks 31 of 375. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
36.7%
Ranks 18 of 375. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 216 of 375. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with digital wallets

29 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
41
Ranks 6 of 29. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
36.7%
Ranks 6 of 29. Typical company: 3.3%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 16 of 29. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers

Some checks could not run. With them, up to level 3 would be possible.

Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Coins.ph publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
52 of 100
  • robots.txtCould not check

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationCould not check

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
  • AI bot rulesCould not check

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsCould not check

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 13 of 100 · 54% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.coins.ph · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Coins.ph as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 41 of 100 badge for Coins.ph

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/coins.ph"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/coins.ph.svg" alt="Overall score 41 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo