Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Chargebee

chargebee.com

Banking and fintech infrastructureFinancial technology and data

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 13, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
167 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
22nd of 315 fintech infrastructure companies
Closing balance

Named in

20of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Chargebee

AI assistants name this fintech infrastructure company in 33.3% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector where that figure is 1.7%. Its overall score is 41 out of 100, which ranks 167th of 2,219 in the study and 54th of 574 in its sector. The website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Chargebee by name. AI assistants named it in 20 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 17th of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
41Overall score
  • Visibility29
  • Citations3
  • Sentiment78
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness36
Summary of account
Named by AI in
33.3%
20 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
22.5%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
54 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on Chargebee as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Chargebee came up on 8 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are some alternatives to traditional recurring billing systems for flexible pricing models?1/4
  2. 02What’s the best way for AI services to track and monetize usage-based billing in real-time?2/4
  3. 03Is investing in an automated billing system worth it for early-stage SaaS businesses?0/4
  4. 04How do usage-based revenue tools compare to fixed-price subscription solutions?0/4
  5. 05What should SaaS founders look for in a revenue management platform?0/4
  6. 06Subscription billing vs usage-based billing: Which is better for AI platforms?0/4
  7. 07What options exist if you need a platform to handle prepaid credit models for AI services?3/4
  8. 08What are the best subscription billing platforms for managing complex recurring payments in SaaS?4/4
  9. 09Are there affordable automated revenue solutions for startups with less than 1,000 users?2/4
  10. 10How much do subscription billing platforms typically cost for mid-sized SaaS companies in the US?4/4
  11. 11How can AI companies automate their revenue operations for multiple pricing models?0/4
  12. 12How can hybrid billing models support SaaS products with both subscriptions and one-time add-ons?0/4
  13. 13Which revenue operation solutions support both compliance and automated tax with subscription billing?3/4
  14. 14Why are failed payments common in recurring billing systems and how can they be reduced?0/4
  15. 15How to resolve invoice errors in automated subscription billing platforms?1/4
Total namedOpenAI: 7/15Claude: 4/15Perplexity: 3/15Gemini: 6/15All assistants: 20/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What are the best subscription billing platforms for managing complex recurring payments in SaaS?”

For complex SaaS recurring payments, the strongest shortlist is Zuora, Stripe Billing, Orb, Metronome, Maxio, and Chargebee. The right choice depends mainly on pricing complexity, enterprise finance requirements, usage volume, and how much billing infrastructure your team wants to build.

Platform · Best for · Strengths · Watch-outs

Zuora · Large, global SaaS businesses · Mature quote-to-cash, multi-entity support, complex contracts, advanced revenue recognition, and enterprise workflows. · Typically heavier to implement and operate; usage-based pricing ma …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Stripe Billing
    15
  2. 02
    Zuora
    11
  3. 03
    Recurly
    11

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Stripe Billing
    31.5%
  2. Chargebee
    22.5%
  3. Zuora
    16.9%
  4. Recurly
    13.5%
  5. SaaSOptics (now Maxio)
    11.2%
  6. Chargify
    4.5%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    stripe.com
    16
  2. 02
    withorb.com
    15
  3. 03
    zuora.com
    11
  4. 04
    chargebee.com (its own website)
    8
  5. 05
    dodopayments.com
    8
  6. 06
    blog.alguna.com
    7
  7. 07
    schematichq.com
    7
  8. 08
    flexprice.io
    6
  9. 09
    zenskar.com
    6
  10. 10
    maxio.com
    5

Chargebee is in the study as a fintech infrastructure company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
7/15
Gemini
6/15
Claude
4/15
Perplexity
3/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Chargebee compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
29

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
3

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
78

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
41
Ranks 54 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
33.3%
Ranks 17 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 83 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with fintech infrastructure companies

315 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
41
Ranks 21 of 315. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
33.3%
Ranks 4 of 315. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 40 of 315. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Chargebee publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 43 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.chargebee.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 15 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*allowed
  • ClaudeBot*allowed
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extended*allowed
  • Applebot-Extended*allowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*allowed
  • FacebookBot*allowed
  • Bytespider*allowed
  • CCBot*allowed
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBot*allowed
  • PerplexityBot*allowed
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbot*allowed
  • YouBot*allowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*allowed
  • Claude-User*allowed
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Chargebee as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 41 of 100 badge for Chargebee

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/chargebee.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/chargebee.com.svg" alt="Overall score 41 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo