Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1,766 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
21st of 22 crypto exchanges
Closing balance

Named in

0of 60, its tower is dark

by 0 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Chainblock SRL

AI assistants do not name this crypto exchange in any of their 60 answers, while companies like Kraken and Coinbase are mentioned. Its overall score is 25 out of 100, ranking 1,766th of 2,219 companies in the study. The website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Chainblock SRL by name. AI assistants named it in none of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 67th of 102 in its sector. The typical crypto and digital asset company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
25Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality67
  • AI readiness36
Summary of account
Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
of the mentions of it and its 4 peers
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
90 of 102
by overall score, where the typical crypto and digital asset company scores 30

Get the full report on Chainblock SRL as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Chainblock SRL came up on 0 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What options exist for exchanging digital assets offline in the United States?0/4
  2. 02Is it a good time to start investing in digital currencies in the US?0/4
  3. 03How do transaction costs vary between different types of crypto exchanges in the US?0/4
  4. 04Are in-person crypto transactions safe in the United States?0/4
  5. 05What are alternatives to online crypto trading platforms for accessing digital currencies?0/4
  6. 06What are the best ways to buy and sell cryptocurrencies in the US right now?0/4
  7. 07What should I do if my crypto transaction is pending for too long on a US platform?0/4
  8. 08What fees should I expect when cashing out cryptocurrency to USD in the United States?0/4
  9. 09What are some practical uses for blockchain technology beyond buying and selling coins?0/4
  10. 10Why might a purchase of cryptocurrency fail at checkout on US-based services?0/4
  11. 11How do peer-to-peer crypto exchanges work in the United States?0/4
  12. 12Which is better for beginners, using a crypto ATM or a web-based exchange?0/4
  13. 13Where else can you buy or sell crypto if leading US platforms are unavailable?0/4
  14. 14How can US residents use cryptocurrencies for retail purchases or bill payments?0/4
  15. 15How do centralized and decentralized crypto platforms differ for US users?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 0/15All assistants: 0/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

Claudedid not name the company

“How do transaction costs vary between different types of crypto exchanges in the US?”

Transaction costs on crypto exchanges in the US vary significantly based on exchange type and structure. Here's how they compare:

Centralized Exchanges (CEX)

Centralized exchanges charge maker/taker fees of 0%–0.60%, along with deposit/withdrawal fees and often fiat on/off ramp fees.

Major US-regulated platforms have different fee tiers:

Binance.US charges 0% maker and 0.02% taker on most spot pairs, among the lowest fees of any regulated U.S. exchange, with no minimum volume required

Coinbase's maker fees start at 0.4% and taker fees at 0.6% for transactions up to $10,000, with …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Named instead

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Kraken
    12
  2. 02
    Coinbase
    8
  3. 03
    Gemini
    6
  4. 04
    Binance.US
    6

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Binance.US
    35.3%
  2. Kraken
    29.4%
  3. Coinbase
    27.5%
  4. Gemini
    7.8%
  5. Chainblock SRL
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    sec.gov
    9
  2. 02
    finance.yahoo.com
    8
  3. 03
    cryptoslate.com
    8
  4. 04
    paybis.com
    6
  5. 05
    fincen.gov
    6
  6. 06
    coinledger.io
    5
  7. 07
    bitget.com
    5
  8. 08
    okx.com
    5
  9. 09
    binance.us
    5
  10. 10
    bitcoin.com
    4

Chainblock SRL is in the study as a crypto exchange.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Chainblock SRL compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
67

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with crypto and digital asset companies

102 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
25
Ranks 90 of 102. Typical company: 30
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 67 of 102. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 21 of 102. Typical company: 33
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with crypto exchanges

22 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
25
Ranks 21 of 22. Typical company: 35
Named in answers
0.0%
Ranks 17 of 22. Typical company: 5.0%
AI readiness
36
Ranks 6 of 22. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Chainblock SRL publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
31 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 7 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · chainblock.it · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on Chainblock SRL as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo