Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Cboe Global Markets

cboe.comCBOE

Market data, ratings and exchangesFinancial technology and data

S&P 500

Also in the US AI Visibility Study

Statement period
September 23, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1,447 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
31st of 37 market data companies
Closing balance

Named in

3of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Cboe Global Markets

AI assistants name this market data company in 5% of answers, more often than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, which ranks it 1,447th of 2,219 companies. The company's website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks, measuring how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Cboe Global Markets by name. AI assistants named it in 3 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 192nd of 574 in its sector. The typical financial technology and data company is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score
26Overall score
  • Visibility6
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness14
Summary of account
Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
7.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
418 of 574
by overall score, where the typical financial technology and data company scores 29

Get the full report on Cboe Global Markets as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Cboe Global Markets came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Decentralized venues for trading US-listed equities and ETFs: what are the options?0/4
  2. 02How are real-time and historical US market data services priced for professional traders?0/4
  3. 03Best marketplaces for accessing volatility indices and equity index products in the US?1/4
  4. 04What are other ways to gain exposure to equity volatility without using standard index options?0/4
  5. 05How do institutional investors use volatility indices to hedge portfolio risk?0/4
  6. 06What can cause delays in clearing and settlement of futures contracts on electronic exchanges?0/4
  7. 07Alternatives to centralized exchanges for trading cryptocurrency derivatives in the US0/4
  8. 08Ways to access prediction markets for S&P 500 forecasts in the US2/4
  9. 09Are advanced trading features on major US exchanges worth the higher fees for active traders?0/4
  10. 10Is it cost-effective to purchase real-time market data feeds from national market infrastructure providers?0/4
  11. 11What are the most reliable US options and futures trading platforms for institutional investors?0/4
  12. 12Options vs futures trading: which is better suited for active retail investors?0/4
  13. 13How do US electronic exchanges compare to traditional open outcry markets for equities trading?0/4
  14. 14Why might my index options order not execute on a US trading venue?0/4
  15. 15Typical fee structures for accessing options and futures trading platforms in the US0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 1/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 1/15All assistants: 3/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

OpenAInamed the company

“Best marketplaces for accessing volatility indices and equity index products in the US?”

Short answer — for U.S. trading the main marketplaces are:

Cboe (Cboe Global Markets / Cboe Futures Exchange)

Primary home of volatility indices (VIX index) and SPX index options.

Trades VIX futures & options (via Cboe Futures Exchange, CFE) and index options such as SPX, RUT, and many VIX‑related products.

Widely used for volatility product price discovery and listed index options.

CME Group (CME)

Major venue for equity index futures (E‑mini S&P 500 / ES, Micro E‑mini / MES, Nasdaq‑100 / NQ, Russell futures historically via ICE/CME).

Also offers options on futures (i …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    NASDAQ
    6

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group (CME Group)
    34.9%
  2. NASDAQ
    30.2%
  3. NYSE (New York Stock Exchange / Intercontinental Exchange)
    27.9%
  4. Cboe Global Markets
    7.0%
  5. MIAX (Miami International Securities Exchange)
    0.0%
  6. BOX Exchange
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    robinhood.com
    14
  2. 02
    cboe.com (its own website)
    14
  3. 03
    finance.yahoo.com
    14
  4. 04
    investopedia.com
    12
  5. 05
    interactivebrokers.com
    12
  6. 06
    cmegroup.com
    11
  7. 07
    sec.gov
    9
  8. 08
    stockbrokers.com
    9
  9. 09
    cftc.gov
    9
  10. 10
    en.wikipedia.org
    9

Cboe Global Markets is in the study as a market data company.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Cboe Global Markets compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
6

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with financial technology and data companies

574 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
26
Ranks 418 of 574. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 192 of 574. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
14
Ranks 504 of 574. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with market data companies

37 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
26
Ranks 31 of 37. Typical company: 36
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 25 of 37. Typical company: 15.0%
AI readiness
14
Ranks 30 of 37. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Can an AI agent check out here?

We could not tell. The website turned away our requests for the files an agent would read. An agent arriving by itself is turned away the same way.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPCould not check
  • UCPCould not check
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardCould not check
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check
  • Agent SkillsCould not check
  • API CatalogCould not check
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 24 of 100 · 65% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.cboe.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Cboe Global Markets as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 26 of 100 badge for Cboe Global Markets

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/cboe.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/cboe.com.svg" alt="Overall score 26 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo