Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Cashera

cashera.com

Small business banking and lendingBanking

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 and 10, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
780 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
16th of 38 small business banking providers
Closing balance

Named in

3of 60 answers

by 1 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Cashera

AI assistants name Cashera in 5% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is not named in any answers. Cashera's overall score is 32 out of 100, ranking 780th of 2,219 companies. Its website passes 6 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Cashera by name. AI assistants named it in 3 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 112th of 394 in its sector. The typical banking company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
32Overall score
  • Visibility9
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness43
Summary of account
Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
18.8%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
113 of 394
by overall score, where the typical banking company scores 28

Get the full report on Cashera as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Cashera came up on 3 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Earnings-based approval vs credit-based approval for self-employed funding0/4
  2. 02Typical fees for instant cash advance services for gig workers in the US0/4
  3. 03Is a merchant cash advance worth it for micro-business owners?0/4
  4. 04How much does a merchant cash advance usually cost self-employed individuals?0/4
  5. 05Best ways micro-businesses use short-term funding for cash flow gaps0/4
  6. 06Fastest funding platforms for self-employed professionals needing emergency cash0/4
  7. 07What to do if your cash advance application is declined as a self-employed professional?0/4
  8. 08Best instant cash advance options for gig workers in the US1/4
  9. 09How can delivery drivers use instant cash advances for vehicle repairs?0/4
  10. 10Merchant cash advances vs business loans for freelancers0/4
  11. 11Are instant funding platforms safe for gig economy workers?0/4
  12. 12What are common funding solutions for rideshare drivers between paychecks?0/4
  13. 13Alternatives to instant cash advance platforms for gig workers needing same-day funds1/4
  14. 14Instant cash advance platforms vs traditional payday advances for gig workers1/4
  15. 15How quickly can gig workers access funds through cash advance services?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 3/15All assistants: 3/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

Gemininamed the company

“Best instant cash advance options for gig workers in the US”

… Cashera Capital: Best for newer gig workers or those with lower revenue requirements, Cashera offers funding across all 50 states. They provide decisions in minutes and funding within 24 hours, with advances up to $5,000. Cashera also aggregates earnings across multiple platforms like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Instacart.

Ualett: Designed specifically for independent workers, Ualett GigAdvance offers cash advances based on recent earnings. It's a good fit for full-time Uber and Lyft drivers who want rideshare-based approval. Ualett connects securely to various gig and freelanc …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Giggle Finance
    3

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Giggle Finance
    62.5%
  2. Cashera
    18.8%
  3. Moves Financial
    18.8%
  4. Fountain Capital
    0.0%
  5. SteadyFI
    0.0%
  6. Grid Money
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    gigglefinance.com
    24
  2. 02
    joingerald.com
    12
  3. 03
    shifttrackerapp.com
    11
  4. 04
    finder.com
    11
  5. 05
    nerdwallet.com
    9
  6. 06
    moneylion.com
    9
  7. 07
    earnin.com
    7
  8. 08
    crestmontcapital.com
    7
  9. 09
    bnine.com
    5
  10. 10
    trybeem.com
    5

Cashera is in the study as a small business banking provider.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Cashera compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
9

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with banking companies

394 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
32
Ranks 113 of 394. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 112 of 394. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 8 of 394. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with small business banking providers

38 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
32
Ranks 16 of 38. Typical company: 29
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 12 of 38. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 3 of 38. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Cashera publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtPublished
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
100 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationPassed

    Requests sent with Accept: text/markdown receive a markdown version of the page.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 54 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · cashera.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 17 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*allowed
  • ClaudeBot*allowed
  • Anthropic-AI*allowed
  • Google-Extended*allowed
  • Applebot-Extended*allowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*allowed
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespider*allowed
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBot*allowed
  • PerplexityBot*allowed
  • Applebot*allowed
  • Amazonbot*allowed
  • YouBot*allowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*allowed
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-User*allowed
  • DuckAssistBot*allowed
  • MistralAI-User*allowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Cashera as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 32 of 100 badge for Cashera

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/cashera.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/cashera.com.svg" alt="Overall score 32 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo