Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
September 23, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
918 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
25th of 74 private equity firms
Closing balance

Named in

3of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Carlyle Group

AI assistants name Carlyle Group in 5% of answers, more often than the typical company in its sector, which is named in 0.8% of answers. Its overall score is 29 out of 100, ranking 918th of 2,219 companies. Its website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Carlyle Group by name. AI assistants named it in 3 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 58th of 238 in its sector. The typical investing and wealth company is named in 0.8% of answers.

Overall score
29Overall score
  • Visibility7
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality93
  • AI readiness7
Summary of account
Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
13.6%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
97 of 238
by overall score, where the typical investing and wealth company scores 28

Get the full report on Carlyle Group as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Carlyle Group came up on 1 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are alternatives to traditional private equity investing for portfolio growth?0/4
  2. 02Private credit funds vs. traditional bank loans—what are the key differences?0/4
  3. 03Why might access to a private investment fund be restricted?0/4
  4. 04How do institutional investors typically use buyout funds in their portfolios?0/4
  5. 05Top-rated private equity firms options for institutional investors3/4
  6. 06What are the best ways to invest in alternative asset management in the United States?0/4
  7. 07Best practices for using private market investments to diversify a portfolio0/4
  8. 08What types of investment strategies are most common in private equity?0/4
  9. 09What should I know before committing capital to a private investment fund?0/4
  10. 10What steps can I take if I am blocked from viewing information about private equity opportunities online?0/4
  11. 11How does private equity differ from venture capital?0/4
  12. 12Differences between infrastructure investments and real estate funds0/4
  13. 13Are secondary market private equity stakes a good investment?0/4
  14. 14Is investing in private equity funds considered worthwhile for accredited investors?0/4
  15. 15What are typical management fees and carried interest rates in private equity funds?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 1/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 1/15Gemini: 1/15All assistants: 3/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

OpenAInamed the company

“Top-rated private equity firms options for institutional investors”

… The Carlyle Group — large diversified private markets platform with significant global buyout and sector specialists. (preqin.com)

Apollo Global Management — credit-led alternatives platform with a large and growing private equity capability. (axis-intelligence.com)

TPG / Bain Capital / Thoma Bravo / CVC / EQT — each is a major specialist or generalist with strong track records in their core sectors (TPG/B …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    KKR
    4
  2. 02
    TPG
    4
  3. 03
    Blackstone
    4
  4. 04
    Apollo Global Management
    4
  5. 05
    Bain Capital
    3

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. KKR
    18.2%
  2. Blackstone
    18.2%
  3. Apollo Global Management
    18.2%
  4. TPG
    18.2%
  5. Carlyle Group
    13.6%
  6. Bain Capital
    13.6%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    am.jpmorgan.com
    16
  2. 02
    blackrock.com
    15
  3. 03
    investopedia.com
    14
  4. 04
    sec.gov
    13
  5. 05
    investor.gov
    11
  6. 06
    moonfare.com
    11
  7. 07
    morganstanley.com
    9
  8. 08
    hamiltonlane.com
    8
  9. 09
    privatebank.jpmorgan.com
    8
  10. 10
    kkr.com
    7

Carlyle Group is in the study as a private equity firm.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Claude
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Carlyle Group compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
7

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
93

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
7

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with investing and wealth companies

238 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
29
Ranks 97 of 238. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 58 of 238. Typical company: 0.8%
AI readiness
7
Ranks 219 of 238. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with private equity firms

74 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
29
Ranks 25 of 74. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
5.0%
Ranks 9 of 74. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
7
Ranks 71 of 74. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Can an AI agent check out here?

We could not tell. The website turned away our requests for the files an agent would read. An agent arriving by itself is turned away the same way.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPCould not check
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 16 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.carlyle.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on Carlyle Group as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 11

Share this result

Overall score 29 of 100 badge for Carlyle Group

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/carlyle.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/carlyle.com.svg" alt="Overall score 29 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo