Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

Bitso Business

business.bitso.com

Cross-border payments and remittancesCards and payments

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 and 10, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
39 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
2nd of 84 cross-border payments providers
Closing balance

Named in

10of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Bitso Business

AI assistants name the cross-border payments provider Bitso Business in 16.7% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is named in none. Bitso Business has an overall score of 46 out of 100, ranking 39th of 2,219 companies. Its website passes 6 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Bitso Business by name. AI assistants named it in 10 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 49th of 375 in its sector. The typical cards and payments company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
46Overall score
  • Visibility22
  • Citations4
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness43
Summary of account
Named by AI in
16.7%
10 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
37.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
5 of 375
by overall score, where the typical cards and payments company scores 27

Get the full report on Bitso Business as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Bitso Business came up on 3 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How do fintech solutions help U.S. businesses streamline cross-border payments to Latin America?0/4
  2. 02How do transaction fees compare between stablecoin-powered platforms and traditional bank wires for large-value enterprise payments?0/4
  3. 03Is it worth switching to a stablecoin-based payment network for corporate treasury management?0/4
  4. 04Are there setup or monthly fees commonly charged by enterprise payment platforms operating in Latin America?0/4
  5. 05Stablecoin-powered payments platforms vs. traditional cross-border wire transfers for enterprises: which is more efficient?0/4
  6. 06Which platforms offer the deepest liquidity for real-time business FX in Latin America?4/4
  7. 07How can stablecoin-powered platforms help with bulk supplier payouts in Latin America?2/4
  8. 08What are some alternative solutions to stablecoin-powered platforms for cross-border business payments?0/4
  9. 09What should enterprises consider before adopting crypto-powered solutions for local payments in Latin America?0/4
  10. 10What are the best stablecoin-powered enterprise payment platforms for cross-border transactions in Latin America?4/4
  11. 11What can cause reconciliation issues when managing stablecoin settlements for enterprise payments?0/4
  12. 12What options do enterprises have besides digital payment rails for sending money to Latin America?0/4
  13. 13Why might cross-border payments to Latin America get delayed on a digital payments platform?0/4
  14. 14What are the main advantages for U.S. enterprises using digital solutions for treasury management across Latin America?0/4
  15. 15How do multi-currency digital payment platforms compare to single-currency solutions for Latin American transactions?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 3/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 2/15Gemini: 3/15All assistants: 10/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What are the best stablecoin-powered enterprise payment platforms for cross-border transactions in Latin America?”

The strongest shortlist for enterprise cross-border payments in Latin America is Mandioca, Bitso Business, BVNK, Bridge, Mural Pay, and VelaFi. The best choice depends on whether the priority is local LATAM rails, global coverage, developer APIs, or B2B corridor specialization.

Platform · Best fit · Why consider it · Main caveat

Mandioca · B2B trade between LATAM and the U.S., Europe, China, or Hong Kong · Purpose-built corridor coverage, bank integrations, and compliance infrastructure are highlighted for LATAM trade flows. · Verify exact country availa …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    dLocal
    5

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Bitso Business
    37.0%
  2. dLocal
    22.2%
  3. Ripple (Ripple Payments)
    18.5%
  4. Stellar (Stellar Anchor Network/Enterprise Payments)
    11.1%
  5. Circle (Circle Accounts)
    7.4%
  6. AirTM for Business
    3.7%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    business.bitso.com (its own website)
    19
  2. 02
    stripe.com
    16
  3. 03
    eco.com
    12
  4. 04
    polygon.technology
    11
  5. 05
    jpmorgan.com
    11
  6. 06
    bvnk.com
    9
  7. 07
    inswitch.com
    8
  8. 08
    tempo.xyz
    8
  9. 09
    stablecoininsider.org
    8
  10. 10
    airwallex.com
    7

Bitso Business is in the study as a cross-border payments provider.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
OpenAI
3/15
Perplexity
2/15
Claude
2/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Bitso Business compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
22

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
4

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with cards and payments companies

375 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
46
Ranks 5 of 375. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
16.7%
Ranks 49 of 375. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 15 of 375. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with cross-border payments providers

84 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
46
Ranks 2 of 84. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
16.7%
Ranks 10 of 84. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
43
Ranks 1 of 84. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Bitso Business publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsPublished
  • API CatalogPublished
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationPassed

    Requests sent with Accept: text/markdown receive a markdown version of the page.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
30 of 100
  • API CatalogPassed

    A linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog listing APIs, specs and docs.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsPassed

    A skills index at /.well-known/agent-skills/index.json that agents can load.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 46 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · bitso.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • PassedMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 13 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBot*partly
  • ClaudeBot*partly
  • Anthropic-AI*partly
  • Google-Extended*partly
  • Applebot-Extended*partly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespider*partly
  • CCBot*partly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBot*partly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBot*partly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbot*partly
  • YouBotpartly

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-User*partly
  • Claude-User*partly
  • Perplexity-User*partly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on Bitso Business as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 46 of 100 badge for Bitso Business

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/business.bitso.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/business.bitso.com.svg" alt="Overall score 46 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo