Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
October 9 and 10, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
555 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

7of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Blockchain Capital

AI assistants name Blockchain Capital in 11.7% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector, which is named in 0.8% of answers. Its overall score is 36 out of 100, ranking 555th of 2,219 companies measured. The website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Blockchain Capital by name. AI assistants named it in 7 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 27th of 238 in its sector. The typical investing and wealth company is named in 0.8% of answers.

Overall score
36Overall score
  • Visibility14
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment88
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
11.7%
7 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
20.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
51 of 238
by overall score, where the typical investing and wealth company scores 28

Get the full report on Blockchain Capital as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Blockchain Capital came up on 4 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Crowdfunding vs. venture capital for early-stage crypto projects0/4
  2. 02Common mistakes crypto entrepreneurs make when pitching to venture capitalists0/4
  3. 03What are the top venture capital firms specializing in blockchain technology?3/4
  4. 04Why might a blockchain startup struggle to attract venture capital investment?0/4
  5. 05How do management fees and carry structures in blockchain VC firms compare to generalist funds?0/4
  6. 06Best venture capital partners for crypto startups in the United States2/4
  7. 07Ways venture funds support decentralized finance and blockchain infrastructure projects0/4
  8. 08How can blockchain startups benefit from working with sector-specific venture capital?1/4
  9. 09Is it worth seeking funding from a dedicated crypto and blockchain venture firm?0/4
  10. 10How does early-stage crypto venture funding differ from growth-stage blockchain investments?0/4
  11. 11What’s the difference between traditional tech venture capital and firms focused on blockchain projects?1/4
  12. 12What are typical deal terms and equity expectations for US-based crypto venture capital investments?0/4
  13. 13What should startups consider before approaching a blockchain-focused VC fund?0/4
  14. 14Alternatives to venture capital for funding a crypto or blockchain startup0/4
  15. 15What are some non-dilutive funding options for blockchain technology entrepreneurs?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 2/15Gemini: 3/15All assistants: 7/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Best venture capital partners for crypto startups in the United States”

The strongest U.S.-based crypto venture capital partners are a16z crypto, Paradigm, Polychain Capital, Pantera Capital, Dragonfly, CoinFund, Blockchain Capital, and Coinbase Ventures. The best choice depends on your stage, technical focus, and need for operational support—not just fund size.

Firm · Best fit · Why consider it

a16z crypto · Seed through growth; infrastructure, applications, fintech · Large, multi-stage platform with extensive recruiting, regulatory, marketing, and business-development support; crypto is a dedicated investment practice.

Pa …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Paradigm
    7
  2. 02
    Pantera Capital
    6
  3. 03
    Electric Capital
    3
  4. 04
    Variant
    1

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Paradigm
    31.4%
  2. Pantera Capital
    22.9%
  3. Blockchain Capital
    20.0%
  4. Digital Currency Group (DCG)
    11.4%
  5. Electric Capital
    11.4%
  6. Variant
    2.9%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    qubit.capital
    27
  2. 02
    growthequityinterviewguide.com
    15
  3. 03
    rho.co
    15
  4. 04
    fastercapital.com
    9
  5. 05
    startupik.com
    7
  6. 06
    cambridgeassociates.com
    5
  7. 07
    cryptofundresearch.com
    4
  8. 08
    startupsavant.com
    4
  9. 09
    dev.to
    4
  10. 10
    theblock.co
    4

Blockchain Capital is in the study as a venture capital firm.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
Claude
2/15
Perplexity
2/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Blockchain Capital compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
14

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
88

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with investing and wealth companies

238 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
36
Ranks 51 of 238. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
11.7%
Ranks 27 of 238. Typical company: 0.8%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 51 of 238. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with venture capital firms

59 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
36
Ranks 10 of 59. Typical company: 26
Named in answers
11.7%
Ranks 6 of 59. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 10 of 59. Typical company: 29
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Blockchain Capital publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
36 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 15 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · blockchaincapital.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on Blockchain Capital as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 11

Share this result

Overall score 36 of 100 badge for Blockchain Capital

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/blockchaincapital.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/blockchaincapital.com.svg" alt="Overall score 36 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo