Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

SWIFT47/60TRANSUNION46/60EXPERIAN42/60COINSTAR41/60NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION41/60ZELLE41/60BLOOMBERG L.P.38/60TRADINGVIEW38/60BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO37/60PAYPAL37/60VENMO37/60CHEXSYSTEMS33/60EQUIFAX33/60MORNINGSTAR32/60S&P GLOBAL31/60ALPACA MARKETS30/60COINBASE30/60PINWHEEL29/60STRIPE29/60XERO29/60ACORNS28/60AFFIRM28/60PAYFAST (PAYGATE)28/60PAYONEER28/60INTERACTIVE BROKERS26/60CHARLES SCHWAB19/60THE HARTFORD9/60MOODY'S21/60CME GROUP19/60ACCENTURE11/60CHUBB10/60MORGAN STANLEY6/60AMERICAN EXPRESS14/60SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL12/60FACTSET20/60NASDAQ19/60ALLSTATE11/60WELLS FARGO18/60PAYCHEX10/60ARES MANAGEMENT3/60
Rezolve Ai
MethodDemo
Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder

The Bank of Tampa

bankoftampa.com

Regional and community banksBanking

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period
October 9 to 14, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
110 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Place in its category
6th of 148 regional and community banks
Closing balance

Named in

9of 60 answers

by 4 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for The Bank of Tampa

AI assistants name this regional or community bank in 15% of answers, while the typical company in its sector is named in 0% of answers. Its overall score is 43 out of 100, ranking 110th of 2,219 studied. The company's website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned The Bank of Tampa by name. AI assistants named it in 9 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 51st of 394 in its sector. The typical banking company is named in 0.0% of answers.

Overall score
43Overall score
  • Visibility25
  • Citations6
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
15.0%
9 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
52.9%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
14 of 394
by overall score, where the typical banking company scores 28

Get the full report on The Bank of Tampa as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

The Bank of Tampa came up on 3 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01Which local banks offer personalized services for professionals in Florida?1/4
  2. 02Is opening a savings account at a local bank beneficial compared to using a larger institution?0/4
  3. 03Best banking options for medical professionals in the Tampa Bay area?4/4
  4. 04What are the best community banks in the Tampa Bay area for small business banking?4/4
  5. 05Are community banks worth it for business owners looking for relationship-focused service?0/4
  6. 06Alternatives to traditional community banks for managing small business finances?0/4
  7. 07Options for professionals seeking private banking without using a large national bank?0/4
  8. 08What are typical fees for checking accounts at community banks in Florida?0/4
  9. 09Are business account maintenance fees lower at local banks versus larger banks?0/4
  10. 10How can I resolve issues with online banking security at a community bank?0/4
  11. 11What to do if I have trouble accessing my small business account at a local bank?0/4
  12. 12What are some digital banking options for individuals who want local-level service?0/4
  13. 13How do community banks support local nonprofits with specialized accounts?0/4
  14. 14How does a community bank compare to a credit union for personal checking accounts?0/4
  15. 15Differences between regional banks and community banks for small business lending?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 2/15Claude: 2/15Perplexity: 2/15Gemini: 3/15All assistants: 9/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“Best banking options for medical professionals in the Tampa Bay area?”

For Tampa Bay medical professionals, the strongest shortlist is The Bank of Tampa, USF Federal Credit Union, and a national healthcare-focused bank such as Chase—with the best choice depending on whether you prioritize local relationship service, personal banking benefits, or scalable practice technology.

Best options

Institution · Best for · Notable strengths

The Bank of Tampa · Physicians owning or acquiring a practice · Dedicated physician and medical-practice banking, commercial checking, money-market accounts, CDs, practice lending, and local decis …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named
  1. 01
    Seacoast Bank
    4

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. The Bank of Tampa
    52.9%
  2. Seacoast Bank
    35.3%
  3. Valley Bank (Florida)
    5.9%
  4. Bank of Central Florida
    5.9%
  5. Pilot Bank
    0.0%
  6. The West Coast Bank
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    bankoftampa.com (its own website)
    13
  2. 02
    seacoastbank.com
    8
  3. 03
    fitsmallbusiness.com
    8
  4. 04
    nerdwallet.com
    7
  5. 05
    bankrate.com
    5
  6. 06
    xero.com
    4
  7. 07
    associatedbank.com
    4
  8. 08
    communityfirstfl.org
    4
  9. 09
    bayfirstfinancial.com
    3
  10. 10
    amerantbank.com
    3

The Bank of Tampa is in the study as a regional or community bank.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
Claude
2/15
OpenAI
2/15
Perplexity
2/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How The Bank of Tampa compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
25

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
6

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with banking companies

394 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
43
Ranks 14 of 394. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
15.0%
Ranks 51 of 394. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 82 of 394. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with regional and community banks

148 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
43
Ranks 4 of 148. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
15.0%
Ranks 9 of 148. Typical company: 0.0%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 25 of 148. Typical company: 21
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. The Bank of Tampa publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · bankoftampa.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
AI crawlersSection 11

What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 86% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI

  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed

AI search

  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed

Answering questions

  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Take it with you

Get the full report on The Bank of Tampa as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

ShareSection 12

Share this result

Overall score 43 of 100 badge for The Bank of Tampa

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/bankoftampa.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/bankoftampa.com.svg" alt="Overall score 43 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
End of statement
All 2,219 companiesHow we measured this
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo