Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
September 23 to 25, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
591 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

2of 60 answers

by 1 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for AXIS Capital

AI assistants rarely name this commercial insurer or broker, mentioning it in 2 out of 60 answers. Its overall score is 36 out of 100, ranking 591st of 2,219 in the study, which is higher than the typical company in its sector. Its website passes 1 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned AXIS Capital by name. AI assistants named it in 2 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 28th of 97 in its sector. The typical insurer is named in 1.7% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
36Overall score
  • Visibility13
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment75
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
Summary of account
Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
100.0%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
25 of 97
by overall score, where the typical insurer scores 28

Get the full report on AXIS Capital as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

AXIS Capital came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01What are the most common types of specialty insurance for technology companies in the US?0/4
  2. 02Common exclusions in environmental liability insurance policies to watch out for?0/4
  3. 03Best specialty reinsurance options for environmental risks in the United States?1/4
  4. 04Difference between primary casualty and excess casualty coverage for businesses?0/4
  5. 05What are some options besides E&S property insurance for commercial property protection?0/4
  6. 06What should you do if your specialty reinsurance claim gets delayed?0/4
  7. 07Is specialty cyber and technology errors & omissions insurance worth it for mid-sized firms?0/4
  8. 08Typical cost factors for accident and health group benefits for organizations?0/4
  9. 09Which industries most frequently use specialty accident and health insurance in the US?1/4
  10. 10Alternatives to purchasing standalone environmental insurance for small businesses?0/4
  11. 11What type of inland marine insurance is best for businesses transporting high-value equipment?0/4
  12. 12Are specialty insurance policies necessary for life sciences startups in the US?0/4
  13. 13When should a construction company consider excess casualty insurance?0/4
  14. 14How does casualty insurance differ from E&S property insurance for commercial clients?0/4
  15. 15How are premiums for cyber and technology E&O insurance determined in the US?0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 0/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 2/15All assistants: 2/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

Gemininamed the company

“Which industries most frequently use specialty accident and health insurance in the US?”

… Emerging markets and unique risk scenarios: Insurers like AXIS Capital offer specialty accident and health solutions for emerging markets and extraordinary circumstances, including e-sports accident insurance.

Essentially, any organization or business where individuals participate in activities that carry a higher or more specific risk of injury, and where traditional insurance might fall short, is a strong candidate for specialty accident and health insurance. This type of coverage provides financial protection for eligible individuals during covered situations, both at work and du …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. AXIS Capital
    100.0%
  2. Arch Insurance North America
    0.0%
  3. Markel
    0.0%
  4. Aspen Insurance
    0.0%
  5. Sompo International
    0.0%
  6. Everest Insurance
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    insureon.com
    25
  2. 02
    thehartford.com
    17
  3. 03
    berkley.com
    16
  4. 04
    chubb.com
    15
  5. 05
    aig.com
    15
  6. 06
    axaxl.com
    10
  7. 07
    insurancebusinessmag.com
    10
  8. 08
    travelers.com
    9
  9. 09
    progressivecommercial.com
    9
  10. 10
    content.naic.org
    8

AXIS Capital is in the study as a commercial insurer or broker.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
2/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How AXIS Capital compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
13

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
75

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with insurers

97 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
36
Ranks 25 of 97. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
3.3%
Ranks 28 of 97. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 51 of 97. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with commercial insurers and brokers

29 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
36
Ranks 6 of 29. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
3.3%
Ranks 6 of 29. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
21
Ranks 12 of 29. Typical company: 21
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. AXIS Capital publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
0 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 0 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.axiscapital.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on AXIS Capital as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo