AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026

Account holder

August Health

augusthealth.com

Health insurers Insurance

Money20/20 attendee

Statement period: October 9 and 10, 2026; when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.: 332 of 2,219; its rank by overall score
Place in its category: 2nd of 11 health insurers

Closing balance

Named in

4of 60 answers

by 3 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for August Health

AI assistants name this health insurer in 6.7% of answers, which is higher than the typical company in its sector at 1.7%. Its overall score is 39 out of 100, ranking 332nd of 2,219 companies, and 12th of 97 in its sector. The website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned August Health by name. AI assistants named it in 4 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 18th of 97 in its sector. The typical insurer is named in 1.7% of answers.

Overall score

Visibility8
Citations3
Sentiment100
Site quality80
AI readiness29

Summary of account

Named by AI in: 6.7%; 4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions: 12.9%; of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness: 4/14; technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector: 12 of 97; by overall score, where the typical insurer scores 28

Get the full report on August Health as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line items01

Every question, and where the company came up

August Health came up on 2 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

01Is investing in an AI-powered EHR system worth it for a midsize senior living community?0/4
02Electronic medication administration records vs. paper-based records in senior living: pros and cons?0/4
03What should I consider before switching to a cloud-based EHR for assisted living operations?0/4
04Are there affordable electronic record platforms tailored for small assisted living operations?1/4
05How can senior living operators resolve issues with digital move-in workflows not syncing correctly?0/4
06What are some alternatives to AI-based electronic health record platforms for elder care communities?0/4
07What features should I look for in a senior living EHR platform to support digital billing and payments?0/4
08Which tools other than digital EHRs can help manage care plans and billing in senior residences?0/4
09In what ways can digital eMAR systems help caregivers in memory care units?0/4
10Which digital solutions are most effective for streamlining operations in assisted living facilities?0/4
11How can an EHR platform improve resident care quality in assisted living environments?0/4
12What can cause data entry errors in electronic health record platforms used in senior care?0/4
13What are the best AI-enabled EHR platforms for senior living communities?3/4
14How do AI-enabled EHR platforms differ from traditional EHR systems for senior care?0/4
15What is the typical price range for AI-enabled EHR subscriptions for senior living facilities?0/4

Total named0/151/151/152/154/60

named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detail02

What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

Perplexitynamed the company

“What are the best AI-enabled EHR platforms for senior living communities?”

The strongest AI-enabled EHR shortlist for U.S. senior living communities is PointClickCare, August Health, and myUnity. Eldermark, ExaCare, and StoriiCare are worth evaluating for specific community sizes, workflows, or budgets.
Platform · Best fit · AI and workflow strengths
PointClickCare Senior Living · Multi-site operators needing a mature, broad ecosystem · Purpose-built senior-living EHR with resident wellness and staff-workflow tools; its 2026 recognition identified it as a leading EHR solution.
August Health · Assisted living and memory-care …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Payees03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Also named

CompanyTimes named

01
PointClickCare
6
02
MatrixCare
4

Share of mentions

CompanyShare

PointClickCare
29.0%
Yardi EHR (Yardi Senior Living Suite)
29.0%
MatrixCare
19.4%
August Health
12.9%
ALIS (by Medtelligent)
6.5%
Caremerge
3.2%

Referrers04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

01
eldermark.com
17
02
ecp123.com
11
03
sourceforge.net
10
04
augusthealth.com (its own website)
8
05
getapp.com
7
06
synkwise.com
6
07
g2.com
6
08
icaremanager.com
6
09
capterra.com
6
10
oracle.com
5

August Health is in the study as a health insurer.

By assistant05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini

2/15

Claude

1/15

Perplexity

1/15

OpenAI

0/15

Market comparison06

How August Health compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment

100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sector07

Compared with insurers

97 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score

Ranks 12 of 97. Typical company: 28

Named in answers

6.7%

Ranks 18 of 97. Typical company: 1.7%

AI readiness

Ranks 22 of 97. Typical company: 29

Against its category08

Compared with health insurers

11 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score

Ranks 2 of 11. Typical company: 37

Named in answers

6.7%

Ranks 5 of 11. Typical company: 5.0%

AI readiness

Ranks 1 of 11. Typical company: 29

AI agents09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

0Not yet agent-ready
1Basic web presence
2Bot-aware
3Agent-readable
4Agent-integrated
5Agent-native

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:

2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers

Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. August Health publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols

x402Not present
MPPNot present
AP2Not present
ACPNot present
UCPNot present

Interfaces for AI agents

MCP Server CardNot present
A2A Agent CardNot present
Agent SkillsNot present
API CatalogNot present
llms.txtNot present
WebMCPCould not check

Show every check, for your technical team

Discoverability

36 of 100

robots.txtNot met
Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.
study: 86.1%
SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
study: 87.9%
Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
study: 1.5%
DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
study: 4.3%

Content accessibility

0 of 100

Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
study: 6.2%
llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
study: 31.0%

Bot access control

32 of 100

AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
study: 92.7%
Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
study: 2.3%
Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
study: 0.3%

APIs, auth and MCP

0 of 100

API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
study: 1.3%
OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
study: 6.3%
OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
study: 5.3%
auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
study: 0.2%
MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
study: 0.8%
A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
study: 0.2%
Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
study: 1.0%
WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
study: 0.0%
ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
study: 0.2%

Score 15 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 9, 2026 · www.augusthealth.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readiness10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
PassedXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%

Take it with you

Get the full report on August Health as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Share11

Share this result

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/finance/augusthealth.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/finance/badges/augusthealth.com.svg" alt="Overall score 39 of 100, Finance AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>

End of statement

All 2,219 companies How we measured this

August Health

What this means for August Health

Get the full report on August Health as a PDF

Every question, and where the company came up

What Perplexity actually said

Where the mentions went

Also named

Share of mentions

Websites the AI used as sources

Which AI assistants named the company

How August Health compares with all 2,219 companies

What makes up the score

Compared with insurers

Compared with health insurers

Ready for AI agents

The checks behind the AI readiness score

Discoverability

Content Accessibility

Bot Access Control

API / Auth / MCP

Get the full report on August Health as a PDF

Share this result

Want AI assistants to name your company?