Of 60 answers

The most named companies in the study, and S&P 500 financials, with how many of their 60 AI answers named them.

Back to the study
AI visibility statementFinance AI Visibility Study 2026Issued October 14, 2026
Account holder
Statement period
September 23 to 28, 2026
when the AI assistants were asked
Account no.
1,033 of 2,219
its rank by overall score
Closing balance

Named in

2of 60 answers

by 2 of 4 assistants

Statement note

What this means for Arch Capital Group

AI assistants rarely name this commercial insurer or broker: just 2 times in 60 answers, which is slightly more often than the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 28 out of 100, ranking 1,033rd of 2,219 companies. Its website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about its market, so no question mentioned Arch Capital Group by name. AI assistants named it in 2 of the 60 answers. Counting only how often it is named, it ranks 28th of 97 in its sector. The typical insurer is named in 1.7% of answers.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its peers.

Overall score
28Overall score
  • Visibility9
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness29
Summary of account
Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
28.6%
of the mentions of it and its 5 peers
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
45 of 97
by overall score, where the typical insurer scores 28

Get the full report on Arch Capital Group as a PDF

Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Line itemsSection 01

Every question, and where the company came up

Arch Capital Group came up on 1 of 15 questions. Open any window to read that answer.

  1. 01How do specialty insurers support risk management for multinational logistics companies?0/4
  2. 02Is it worth investing in tailored specialty insurance for a technology startup?0/4
  3. 03What should I consider when choosing a specialty reinsurance partner as a small insurer?0/4
  4. 04Why might a claim under a specialty insurance policy be delayed or denied?0/4
  5. 05How do specialty insurance and standard commercial insurance policies differ?0/4
  6. 06Common challenges businesses face when placing complex reinsurance coverage0/4
  7. 07What are the top options for specialty insurance providers in the US market?2/4
  8. 08Which reinsurance solutions are best suited for midsize businesses seeking tailored coverage?0/4
  9. 09Differences between treaty and facultative reinsurance for property and casualty risks0/4
  10. 10What are some alternatives to specialty insurance for organizations with unique risk profiles?0/4
  11. 11Typical pricing tiers for specialty insurance versus traditional business insurance plans0/4
  12. 12Best use-cases for mortgage insurance solutions in the US real estate sector0/4
  13. 13Mortgage insurance vs reinsurance for financial institutions—what's the main distinction?0/4
  14. 14Does switching to specialty insurance result in cost savings for established manufacturing firms?0/4
  15. 15Best specialty risk insurance types for companies with global operations0/4
Total namedOpenAI: 0/15Claude: 1/15Perplexity: 0/15Gemini: 1/15All assistants: 2/60
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. Across the study, on 50% of the questions where a company is named, only one AI assistant names it.

Transaction detailSection 02

What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

Claudenamed the company

“What are the top options for specialty insurance providers in the US market?”

… Arch Capital Group is a public company which writes insurance, reinsurance and mortgage insurance on a worldwide basis, with a focus on specialty lines, and is headquartered in Bermuda while operating globally in 60 offices in North America, Europe, Asia and Australia.

Specialty-Focused Providers:

Markel US specialty insurance provides niche markets with unusual coverage needs, providing the most innovative solutions for the most complex problems. Markel was named a 2026 Insurance Business America (IBA) 5-Star Claims winner.

Kemper's Specialty Property & Casualty Insurance segment pro …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

PayeesSection 03

Where the mentions went

The companies these answers named, and how the mentions were split between this company and its peers.

Share of mentions

CompanyShare
  1. Markel Corporation
    42.9%
  2. Arch Capital Group
    28.6%
  3. Everest Group, Ltd.
    28.6%
  4. Axis Capital Holdings Limited
    0.0%
  5. RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
    0.0%
  6. PartnerRe Ltd.
    0.0%
ReferrersSection 04

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

  1. 01
    insurancebusinessmag.com
    18
  2. 02
    commercial.allianz.com
    15
  3. 03
    munichre.com
    10
  4. 04
    insureon.com
    10
  5. 05
    axaxl.com
    10
  6. 06
    chubb.com
    9
  7. 07
    casact.org
    7
  8. 08
    finance.yahoo.com
    7
  9. 09
    business.com
    7
  10. 10
    ajg.com
    7

Arch Capital Group is in the study as a commercial insurer or broker.

By assistantSection 05

Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
1/15
Gemini
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Market comparisonSection 06

How Arch Capital Group compares with all 2,219 companies

Every tower is a company in the study, taller for a higher overall score and lit where AI assistants named it. Its own group stays lit. Hover a tower to see it, and click to open it.

What makes up the score

Each part is scored out of 100.

Visibility
9

How often AI assistants name the company, and how that compares with its peers

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Against its sectorSection 07

Compared with insurers

97 companies in this sector. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
28
Ranks 45 of 97. Typical company: 28
Named in answers
3.3%
Ranks 28 of 97. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 22 of 97. Typical company: 29
Against its categorySection 08

Compared with commercial insurers and brokers

29 companies in this category. The gold tick on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score
28
Ranks 11 of 29. Typical company: 27
Named in answers
3.3%
Ranks 6 of 29. Typical company: 1.7%
AI readiness
29
Ranks 4 of 29. Typical company: 21
AI agentsSection 09

Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and pay through, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent check out here?

Not by itself. Arch Capital Group publishes none of the agent payment protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the website like a person.

Agent payment protocols
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • ACPNot present
  • UCPNot present
Interfaces for AI agents
  • MCP Server CardNot present
  • A2A Agent CardNot present
  • Agent SkillsNot present
  • API CatalogNot present
  • llms.txtNot present
  • WebMCPCould not check
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 86.1%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 87.9%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 1.5%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 4.3%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 6.2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 31.0%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 92.7%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 2.3%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.3%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 1.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 6.3%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 5.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.2%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.8%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.2%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 1.0%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 0.0%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.2%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.archgroup.com · 2,200 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

AI readinessSection 10

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks

Discoverability

  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.1%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 79.4%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 42.5%

Content Accessibility

  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 7.4%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 28.1%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 97.3%

Bot Access Control

  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 11.5%

API / Auth / MCP

  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 1.1%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 5.2%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 4.6%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.2%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 0.3%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.1%
Take it with you

Get the full report on Arch Capital Group as a PDF

Every number on this page in a PDF you can keep and share with your team. Enter your work email to download it.

We’ll use your email to follow up about this report. Privacy policy

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo